Author Topic: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012  (Read 11722 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline brosa0

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
  • The answer is meat
Re: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2012, 05:18:53 AM »
I thought Pathfinder was fairly reasonable in last night's episode for the game that it is.  The contestant seemed a bit too keen to just step forward whenever possible after getting the first one wrong, and seemed like she didn't consider the other numbers as closely.

Offline elskunkoman

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1295
Re: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2012, 10:01:20 AM »
I didn't think it was so wise of the pathfinder contestant to step on the 6 from the middle square.
pepe! It took us all summer to clean out all the skunk stink from seasons 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40!!!

Offline temptation1979ga

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 5777
    • The Price is Right episode trading
Re: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2012, 11:39:40 AM »
I didn't think it was so wise of the pathfinder contestant to step on the 6 from the middle square.

Well, since it was an incorrect choice, obviously.  :roll:

Offline elskunkoman

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1295
Re: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012
« Reply #33 on: February 16, 2012, 05:08:49 PM »
Well, since it was an incorrect choice, obviously.  :roll:

A LFaT wouldn't have chosen the 6 from the 2. She'd know better if she was a LFaT.
pepe! It took us all summer to clean out all the skunk stink from seasons 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40!!!

Offline stardf29

  • Taking a Bonus Spin
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: TPiR Recap - 2/15/2012
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2012, 09:49:26 PM »
It's kind of weird even from a non-LFaT perspective, since last I checked, people typically underprice Accords, so I thought she'd naturally gravitate towards the lowest number. I'm glad she at least went for the 3 immediately afterwards; I was worried she'd try 5, then 4...