I did some research about statistics for Time is Money.
https://priceisright.fandom.com/wiki/Pricing_Game_Stats/Season_52_Statistics was what I used as my source.
I compiled some statistics for this pricing game from season 43, when it began, through last season.
To the best of my knowledge, these totals are based solely on the daytime version and not any prime time specials. I could be mistaken about that.
In any event, if I am correct, here's a breakdown.
The game was played a total of 127 times during its first 9 seasons in the rotation.
Every one of those seasons the game was played at least 12 times, up to as many as 16 times during a given season.
Out of 127 playings, a grand total of 7 won the $20,000 prize.
That works out to a winning percentage of 5 and 1/2 percent.
So the game has 7 wins and 120 losses during these first 9 seasons.
And of those 120 losses, 79 percent, almost two-thirds of the losses, resulted in $0, in other words, total wipeouts.
A tremendous lack of play-along ability both for the studio audience members and the viewing audience at home, coupled with such an abysmal failure rate further supports my very low opinion of this pricing game.
So while Stack the Deck and That's Too Much! are strongly detested, and understandably so, I don't know if the win rates for those two pricing games is as low. I did not research that far into it.
I imagine if Roger were asked about Time is Money, and maybe he has been, I suspect he would say he might dislike it, if for no other reason than he did not seem to like having pricing games that had partial wins, such as Step Up.
I'd much rather see Pay the Rent retooled somehow and replace Time is Money. Time is Money even makes Plinko more appealing to me.