Golden-Road.net

Studio 33 - Price is Right Discussion => The TALK Is Right => Topic started by: Torgo on June 12, 2017, 12:19:52 PM

Title: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Torgo on June 12, 2017, 12:19:52 PM
Welcome to Golden-Road! If you just joined and have the insatiable urge to ask some questions pertaining to The Price Is Right, we understand. However, some of your questions may have a simple answer that will not generate any real discussion. Furthermore, other members have asked your question(s) several times over and may not feel like responding to such a thread again!

In order to facilitate such questions and welcome new members, welcome to the Simple Questions & Answers Thread! Any question posted here will receive no judgment, and hopefully you will receive an answer in the near future.

Keep in mind these few cardinal rules:
- No dumb questions exist. Trust me, no one will fault you for not knowing as much about the show as some of our experts around these parts. No one wishes to intimidate anyone. (I think.)
- While no one will consider a question dumb, keep in mind that some answers may lie within the FAQ. Feel free to consult that first and see if your answers lie within.
- Please refrain from bumping for the sake of getting your question answered. I stickied this thread to prevent this from dropping down the archives.
- This thread has many functions, but it will not serve as a new member introduction. Please keep those to the Out in Left Field section.
- All other forum rules still apply.

Ask away!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on June 12, 2017, 06:42:23 PM
I know I'm not new, but something I have wondered for years and never thought it warranted its own thread:

When did they go from using one piece of music during each showcase to utilizing several different cues in any one given showcase?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Mr. Weatherman on June 12, 2017, 07:45:25 PM
When did they go from using one piece of music during each showcase to utilizing several different cues in any one given showcase?

For as long as I can remember in all my years of watching the show, there have been showcases to feature more than one cue -- in the Barker days, this was particularly the case during certain skits or (sometimes, though not every time) when a car was revealed, although I don't know when they started doing this.  It's only been since the complete overhaul of the cues a few years into the Carey run that it has become standard practice to feature multiple cues within most, if not all showcases.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: rodroddyfan on June 12, 2017, 11:09:26 PM
I don't know if this was ever answered, but why did they get rid of the head on shot during the putts in Hole in One?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on June 12, 2017, 11:53:58 PM
Quote from: rodroddyfan
I don't know if this was ever answered, but why did they get rid of the head on shot during the putts in Hole in One?

I know it was the topic of many discussions (and a lot of Mike-bashing), but I have a theory.  The head-on shot can be very anti-climactic.  From that camera angle, one could tell almost instantly whether the ball was going to be close or not.  It's really a bit of a letdown when you can see immediately that the ball is going to miss badly - and you could see it immediately when it happened.

The side angle that is currently used may not look as good, but at least it allows the viewer to feel some suspense, as it is less obvious if the ball is going into or even close to the cup.  A badly hit ball, by way of the optical illusion of the camera angles, could still at least LOOK close, even if it is off by a mile.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GSNSmashFan3 on June 13, 2017, 11:42:23 AM
Is there any particular reason why partial wins don't occur in Make Your Move? The way in which the game is designed allows for the possibility of a contestant guessing just one price correctly, but unlike most other pricing games, the contestant isn't awarded the prize they priced correctly whenever this happens.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Torgo on June 13, 2017, 06:28:55 PM
Is there any particular reason why partial wins don't occur in Make Your Move?

Okay, let's look at it this way.

Representative Board:
A B C D E F G H I

Only six possible combinations exist as solutions in this game.
ABCD EFG HI
ABCD EF GHI
ABC DEFG HI
ABC DE FGHI
AB CDE FGHI
AB CDEF GHI

Each prize only has four possible prices available on the board, and the game already features a one-in-six chance of winning completely blind. I feel like awarding an accidental/unintended partial win in Make Your Move goes against the spirit of the game ("solving the puzzle"), not to mention that this would occur all the time.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on June 13, 2017, 07:11:42 PM
Also, if a contestant correctly priced the four-digit prize but not the other two prizes, it would be an awkward win:

"You won the trip to London! But you didn't win the hair dryer or the recliner."
"...So?"
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: OneBidTris on June 14, 2017, 04:03:15 AM
This will probably only interest the serious fans, but someone out there probably knows the answer to this question.

Have the golf ball backdrops changed in Hole in One? They looked a little faded on an older playing and I'm wondering if they updated them for the game today.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: brosa0 on June 15, 2017, 12:22:27 AM
Also, if a contestant correctly priced the four-digit prize but not the other two prizes, it would be an awkward win:

"You won the trip to London! But you didn't win the hair dryer or the recliner."
"...So?"

Partial wins were allowed in the 90's Aussie version [from 19:37]:

Not a valid youtube URL
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on June 22, 2017, 06:17:24 PM
Are we ever going to get a solid reason for why Buy or Sell and Credit Card were retired beyond "we just didn't like them?"
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wink87 on June 22, 2017, 07:27:27 PM
Also, if a contestant correctly priced the four-digit prize but not the other two prizes, it would be an awkward win:

"You won the trip to London! But you didn't win the hair dryer or the recliner."
"...So?"

Speaking of which, there was a playing back in 1992 where the board was set up in such a way, that the contestant priced 2 of the 3 prizes correctly and still lost. Bob thought it was "interesting".
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on June 22, 2017, 07:43:03 PM
^ how is that possible? I'd figured that getting two would necessitate the third being right also.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperSweeper on June 22, 2017, 07:46:43 PM
^ how is that possible? I'd figured that getting two would necessitate the third being right also.

From what I recall, the board was setup something like this: 503050789. The right answer was along the lines of 50/3050/789, and the contestant guessed 5030/50/789.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on June 22, 2017, 08:07:03 PM
Are we ever going to get a solid reason for why Buy or Sell and Credit Card were retired beyond "we just didn't like them?"

Roger talked about Buy or Sell's retirement not too long ago on his Facebook page. (https://www.facebook.com/Rogerdob/posts/10154091349672055?comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22O%22%7D)

"I found the game not particularly fun...it was long...and the concept of buying or selling a little off (how does one 'sell' a prize if one hasn't bought it...but one doesn't really own it because he's given the option to buy it)"

I don't recall ever getting an official answer about Credit Card, but the most likely reason is that it's a very long game and the show's fighting for every second. Because long games are much harder to schedule in the lineup, they'd need to get a lot of bang for its buck to justify their keeping around on the show.

The nature of the game meant that the five prizes usually needed to be relatively cheap compared to prizes offered in other multiprizers like, say, Most Expensive. The average Credit Card prize package in Season 36 was $4,640; the average Most Expensive package was $6,047. 14 out 25 (http://tpirstats.com/Season36/PGStats.html) prizes offered in Credit Card that season were under $1,000; only out of 75 prizes offered in Most Expensive were under $1,000. The desire for the new staff to offer "bigger and better prizes" could have played a factor.

The "insert the card to find the credit limit" bit was the most fun thing about the game, but Drew didn't always do it, and of course, it took up even more of the show's airtime.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bigblue999 on June 22, 2017, 08:45:41 PM
Anyone know why the models stopped rolling out the Hi-Lo set?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PatrickRox80 on June 22, 2017, 08:50:04 PM
"I found the game not particularly fun...it was long...and the concept of buying or selling a little off (how does one 'sell' a prize if one hasn't bought it...but one doesn't really own it because he's given the option to buy it)"

While I understand Roger's reasoning, I don't see why this kind of simulations warrants Buy or Sell being retired. When Drew started hosting around the same time, he tied Temptation to a birthday theme and Roger somehow didn't have a problem with that.

On that note, whose idea was it to give contestants the cash bonus for winning the game?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Josh444 on June 23, 2017, 01:07:54 PM
I have a random question:

When Drew shuffles around the shells in Shell Game, he says that he doesn't know where the ball is. Wouldn't he be able to kind of get a feel for where the ball is, as it would hit the sides of the shell as it is being shuffled? I feel like that could potentially help with the reveal.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 23, 2017, 01:39:02 PM
Anyone know why the models stopped rolling out the Hi-Lo set?

Drew kept forgetting to do the grocery plugs before the prize reveal, so eventually, they just decided to streamline the game's introduction.

(Personally, I've never thought that was a very good reason -- it's not like there weren't other ways to fix that that preserved the reveal -- but it is the reason.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRFan2000 on June 23, 2017, 03:25:51 PM
Why does the contestant still get cash if they lose on the first three grocery products ($1/$10/$100) in Grand Game, but nothing if they lose on the fourth grocery product ($1,000)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on June 23, 2017, 03:42:02 PM
When Drew shuffles around the shells in Shell Game, he says that he doesn't know where the ball is. Wouldn't he be able to kind of get a feel for where the ball is, as it would hit the sides of the shell as it is being shuffled? I feel like that could potentially help with the reveal.

He doesn't know where the ball starts. Having shuffled the shells myself, I can confirm that you can feel the ball bouncing around inside.

However, it's tougher to describe the rules of the game while simultaneously (and secretly) keeping track of where the ball is going or where it ends up. Drew doesn't want to know ahead of time whether the contestant is going to win or lose, so perhaps he focuses his attention on what he's saying and just lets the ball stop where it stops?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on June 23, 2017, 04:44:25 PM
Why does the contestant still get cash if they lose on the first three grocery products ($1/$10/$100) in Grand Game, but nothing if they lose on the fourth grocery product ($1,000)?

Because they have the choice to quit the game at that point. If there's no risk involved, the game becomes less exciting.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Casey on June 23, 2017, 05:45:38 PM
Since we are on the topic of Shell Game, does anyone know why Drew no longer allows the contestants to place the chips themselves?  I can't imagine that saved much more time than allowing them to do it...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TinoStar11 on June 23, 2017, 06:01:57 PM
Why , on the Money Game Board , the "Year" Number is placed where it is ( Top Row , Center ) ?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRFan2000 on June 23, 2017, 09:19:07 PM
Because they have the choice to quit the game at that point. If there's no risk involved, the game becomes less exciting.
D'oh, not sure how I forgot about something so obvious when I asked that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CJBojangles on June 24, 2017, 12:39:22 AM
Since we are on the topic of Shell Game, does anyone know why Drew no longer allows the contestants to place the chips themselves?  I can't imagine that saved much more time than allowing them to do it...

I chalk it up to him just not paying that much attention to the intricacies of each game in his hosting style. He also doesn't let the contestant "Pass the Buck" anymore, he placed the marks on "Make Your Mark", and on at least one occasion he didn't even have the contestant open the safe.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRFan2000 on June 28, 2017, 10:06:16 PM
Why are the prize values in Master Key and Rat Race (as well as the bonus prize in Clock Game) never announced?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on June 29, 2017, 08:28:43 PM
Why are the prize values in Master Key and Rat Race (as well as the bonus prize in Clock Game) never announced?

They could, I suppose, but I'm guessing it's to make a cleaner presentation.

For Master Key and Pay the Rent:

1) It doesn't make sense to describe the prizes as a "prize package" since the contestant can win any combination of the three prizes offered.
2) The home audience doesn't really care that much. The focus is directed towards if the car/prize is won, not on the value of the prize.

For Clock Game: In addition to #2 from above, you risk making the gameplay less smooth.

If you give the price of the whole prize package, you might end up misleading a nervous contestant into thinking, "Hmm, the whole prize package is $7,500, there's 3 prizes, what's 1/3 of that?" The audience can't do anything to correct them, so the game would end up in the game going something like this:

"$2,500." "Lower." "$2,400." "Lower". "$2,300".

That'd be painful to watch.

If you only give the price of the bonus prize, same deal. You're putting unwarranted focus on the bonus prize. This could throw off a contestant who doesn't realize they need to be focusing on the cheaper prizes, or that the other two prizes ARE significantly cheaper.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: rodroddyfan on June 30, 2017, 03:36:19 PM
I have heard that in this day of the price, even if you are chosen to be a contestant, if you do not act the way MR wants you to act during the show before you called to come on down,, he will have you replaced with someone else.  Is that true?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on June 30, 2017, 06:54:20 PM
I have heard that in this day of the price, even if you are chosen to be a contestant, if you do not act the way MR wants you to act during the show before you called to come on down,, he will have you replaced with someone else.  Is that true?

Probably true. Probably happened in the Bob/Roger era as well.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: sideshowPA on July 01, 2017, 11:49:13 AM
I have heard that in this day of the price, even if you are chosen to be a contestant, if you do not act the way MR wants you to act during the show before you called to come on down,, he will have you replaced with someone else.  Is that true?

My sense is that they keep their options open during the show and have the ability to "call an audible" during the show.  I wonder if this is more a function of a contestant originally NOT in the top 9, but on the fringe, gaining the attention of the producers as the show progresses.  I'd be very interested to hear how often this happens.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on July 03, 2017, 12:53:04 AM
My sense is that they keep their options open during the show and have the ability to "call an audible" during the show.  I wonder if this is more a function of a contestant originally NOT in the top 9, but on the fringe, gaining the attention of the producers as the show progresses.

Interesting.

One of the misconceptions I used to have about the show was that contestants were selected based on "how well they cheered" as the show went into commercial breaks.  I had visions of the producers looking at the monitors, pointing out people they particularly liked as the cameras panned the crowd.

Of course, back then I didn't know about Stan Blits and his pre-interviews, and I didn't think about how the first four contestants were chosen, since there would have been no way for anyone to see how "well" they cheered going into a break.

But it seems that I may not have been completely wrong after all...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on July 03, 2017, 01:22:13 AM
Noticed this, from a post in the "That "Come on Down!" Feeling! (A Fan's Taping Experience - Now Aired)" thread...

Something I noticed a few times during stop downs was Stan kept coming out and scanning the audience with a folder in hand . . . . . I assume he was eyeing potential contestants as he shifted through his papers.

Wonder if it supports the theory that selected-but-not-yet-called contestants are "reviewed" during the taping.  Of course, we don't know WHAT Stan was doing with the folder, maybe he just wanted to know where the chosen ones were seated (perhaps to tell the camera where to shoot?).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on July 03, 2017, 11:38:34 AM
Another question from me that I've wondered the answer to for a while - since TPiR tugboat and train are really just forklifts, do the models need certification to operate it same as people who need it that work with them everyday in their jobs?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Brian44 on July 03, 2017, 12:28:02 PM
Why are the prize values in Master Key and Rat Race (as well as the bonus prize in Clock Game) never announced?

Some of us posed questions about the rationale behind whether or not the total dollar amounts are announced to Roger Dobkowitz on Facebook and he essentially confirmed:

--The reason why the total prize package amount IS announced in games like Safe Crackers is because it's all-or-nothing. You can't win the main prize without winning the 3-digit prize. (By that rationale--and I believe Roger confirmed this, too--even if a car was on offer in Super Ball, the game was not officially considered a "win" if you did not win all 3 main prizes.)

--The reason why the total prize package amount is NOT announced in Master Key is because the game is officially considered a "win" as long as you win the car, whether or not you win the other two main prizes. (Same would go for Rat Race, as I recall.)

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on July 03, 2017, 05:34:53 PM
Another question from me that I've wondered the answer to for a while - since TPiR tugboat and train are really just forklifts, do the models need certification to operate it same as people who need it that work with them everyday in their jobs?

I know the casual term that's been used when describing the train and tugboat chassis is "forklift," but in reality, the vehicle isn't an actual forklift. I don't know what specifically the vehicle underneath the train/tugboat is, but I conducted a brief, probably inaccurate search. If you Google "stock chaser," you'll see an electric vehicle fairly similar to what I've seen being driven around Television City -- I think that's what's underneath the train/tugboat shell. (Disclaimer: I'm not 100% positive, as I've never seen the shell being switched. But it's certainly the right shape.)

An even briefer search didn't turn up any special requirements to operate one of those vehicles, so I'm assuming that everything is on the up and up. And as soon as the model isn't visible on camera anymore, they get out and a CBS employee takes over operation of the vehicle. For example, in the Train Depot and Port o' Price showcases, as soon as the first prize stopped in front of the set opening, a CBS employee jumped in and drove the vehicle for the introduction of the remaining two prizes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Nick on July 20, 2017, 09:33:27 PM
The recent thread on the longest turnaround between taping and airing got me thinking of a couple of similar subjects on which I have forgotten the answer: First, the shortest turnaround between taping and airing.  That was, what, three days?  And it's happened on a few occasions, correct?

Second, fewest number of shows in the can.  The number was obviously zero after season 35 before season 36 when a host still hadn't been decided.  It happened also for a short time span (only a few hours as I recall) at the end of one season because of some last-minute taping cancellations that resulted in the first taped shows of the following season happening after the airing of the season finale.  That was at the end of season 34, correct?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRFan2000 on July 20, 2017, 09:46:54 PM
The recent thread on the longest turnaround between taping and airing got me thinking of a couple of similar subjects on which I have forgotten the answer: First, the shortest turnaround between taping and airing.  That was, what, three days?  And it's happened on a few occasions, correct?
It was mentioned later in that thread - a military special in Season 39 (#5551K) aired the day after it taped. (it taped 5/2/2011, and aired 5/3/2011)

I'm not sure if we've had any three-day turnarounds, but I have a list of all taping dates going back to Season 41, and I do know that there was a two-day turnaround in Season 43 (#6911K, aired 12/8/2014).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TinoStar11 on July 20, 2017, 10:21:45 PM
I'm not sure if we've had any three-day turnarounds, but I have a list of all taping dates going back to Season 41, and I do know that there was a two-day turnaround in Season 43 (#6911K, aired 12/8/2014).

Based on that show , that was James 1st show after he won the Male Model Search.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: nwfisch on July 21, 2017, 06:52:44 PM
Is there a reason that Punch a bunch, the money doesn't roll over via Plinko?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 21, 2017, 07:12:39 PM
Simple, Punch a Bunch was designed with a risk element, Plinko wasn't.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on July 21, 2017, 09:04:54 PM
When did they start the habit of playing a Christmas carol during the closing of the last episode preceding Christmas day instead of the shows theme, as well as for the 4th of July?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 21, 2017, 09:15:57 PM
One thing I'm curious about, when did the tradition of season premiere weeks having extra set decorations and higher-than-usual prize budgets start?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: dmaingame on July 22, 2017, 04:02:30 AM
Season 10 (September 1981) is the earliest I can remember the set being decorated for premiere week shows.  Sometime around that point, started the tradition of Mark Goodson making an appearance during the season premiere each year until his death in December 1992.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PIRfanSince72 on July 24, 2017, 05:27:03 PM
Only other time I can remember any "decor" earlier is with the "ANNIVERSARY WEEK" sign on the center door when they had the rainbow wheel during September 1975.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on July 25, 2017, 01:21:27 AM
And that wasn't even premiere week.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CJBojangles on August 10, 2017, 01:42:28 PM
Did anyone ever spin $1.00 on the 1994 Davidson shows that used the Big Wheel? If so, was any music played?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: EvilChameleon on August 11, 2017, 05:53:56 PM
When does the next season begin?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Kapi on September 05, 2017, 11:30:28 AM
I have a question regarding spinning the Big Wheel.

I've seen on many occasions the third person to spin will take the lead in one spin. (For example, the top spinner has 60 cents, while the last contestant to spin gets 75 cents on their first spin.) How come this person is never given the decision to spin again? Drew never mentions this as a possibility, and it simply seems like it's an unwritten rule of sorts to not ask.

I mean, obviously a lot of people are just going to take it and run, but what if someone wanted to take the risk to get a dollar, would they be able to, or does everything simply move on once they take the lead?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on September 05, 2017, 11:42:12 AM
^ Bob would usually say "You don't want to spin again, do you?" to such contestants for the sake of completeness. Drew probably should say something, similar to how he often ends Pass The Buck as soon as the car is won (although he has gotten better at not doing that in recent years, to be fair). I suppose a contestant could push the issue if they really wanted, but since he's gotten away with it for 10 years now, it's obviously not a huge concern for TPTB.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on September 05, 2017, 12:22:32 PM
I'll bet that it's written into the rules, as explained to the contestants:
"If you're the 3rd spinner, and the first two go over, you're automatically in the Showcase.  We'll give you ONE SPIN to see if you can get a dollar."

There's no ambiguity to that rule, and no reason to ask if they want to spin again if the rule was presented that way.

Someone with more knowledge can clarify, but I suspect I'm not wrong.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on September 05, 2017, 10:55:00 PM
^ That's not the situation OP asked about. What he was referring to was when the 1st or 2nd spinner is in the lead, say with 65 cents, and spinner #3's first spin lands on 70. Theoretically, even though they have a winning total, they are supposed to be offered one more spin to see if they can hit 1.00. Obviously the vast majority of contestants wouldn't ever do it, but it is an option that Bob mentioned and Drew skips over it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on September 05, 2017, 11:12:04 PM
Yup, you're right.  I totally misread that post.

Still, I'll bet it's explained in a similar fashion.
"If you're the third spinner and you beat the other spinner's score with 1 spin, you're in the Showcase."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on September 05, 2017, 11:47:06 PM
There's a Showcase Showdown question I have...

Let's say you're the third spinner, and you tie the leader with your first spin. When should you take the tie and try to win it in the spinoff, and when should you try to win it outright then and use your second spin?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on September 06, 2017, 12:24:18 AM
You and your opponent have an equal chance of winning in the spinoff.

Therefore, spin again at 45 cents or less and go to the spinoff at 55 cents or more.

Do whatever feels right at 50 cents.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Archviler on September 06, 2017, 12:47:59 PM
Interesting, but let me build on that. Assume the previous question, but that it would be a three way tie for a three way spinoff. Does that change the math of it at all?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: sideshowPA on September 06, 2017, 03:38:11 PM
That most definitely does change the math...

If there is a 3-way tie, then we go back to square one.  According to Scorpz's site, historically the 3rd spinner wins about 36% of the time...and advantage to be sure, but nothing overwhelming.

Therefore, my decision will be based on trying to improve upon my 36% if I accept the tie.  So, if the tie is at 60 cents, spinning again is wise, as I will win 40% of the time.  If the tie is at 65 cents, I can spin again and have a 35% chance of winning, but I may elect to go here with the added equity of hitting the dollar being 1/20. 
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricegator on September 17, 2017, 10:34:52 AM
In an interview with Mike Richard on youtube, the interviewer asks him if they have retired any games since he has taken over or recently and he says no. Do you think he forgot about Step Up or do you think Step Up will make a comeback?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: rodroddyfan on September 17, 2017, 03:11:11 PM
I will probably get bashed, but with the number of losses in games such as TTM and PTR, I doubt Richards will ever retire them.  Most of us know that he focuses more on the comedy aspect of the show.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Schfifty on September 17, 2017, 03:17:46 PM
In an interview with Mike Richard on youtube, the interviewer asks him if they have retired any games since he has taken over or recently and he says no. Do you think he forgot about Step Up or do you think Step Up will make a comeback?

Well, looking at the interview that was posted last March, he said that they hadn't retired a game in "a while", but that could mean as long as a couple of years ago, which is when Step Up was last played (technically almost three years ago). I would consider it retired still, because it was taken off the list of pricing games on the show's website around the end of Season 43, if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Casey on September 17, 2017, 03:20:10 PM
Most of us know that he focuses more on the comedy aspect of the show.
You really must watch a different show than I do.  Other than the April Fool's special episodes, I can't think of anything in recent years that was done specifically for comedy values.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GuyWithFace on September 17, 2017, 03:50:44 PM
In an interview with Mike Richard on youtube, the interviewer asks him if they have retired any games since he has taken over or recently and he says no.
At least Make Your Mark, Clearance Sale, and Step Up all fit this criteria, and I strongly suspect Credit Card does as well. Barker's Bargain Bar and Check Game were essentially retired for years (particularly the former), and 3 Strikes teetered rather close to it given what happened in Season 37.

I will probably get bashed, but with the number of losses in games such as TTM and PTR, I doubt Richards will ever retire them.
I assure you that more than a few around here are in full agreement with you, particularly since Pay the Rent was initially never meant to be won.

Most of us know that he focuses more on the comedy aspect of the show.
As Casey stated, not quite. He seems more focused on the "BIG PRIZE" mentality (see, again, Pay the Rent).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SBarsodo on November 09, 2017, 03:33:12 PM
I have quick question.  I seem to remember a long time ago I was watching an episode of TPIR and saw that they offered a hoveround in Double Prices.  I think it was during the early 2000's.  Is this true?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on November 09, 2017, 03:37:24 PM
I'm not sure about that occurrence but I seem to believe they had offered one on Race Game sometime around 2006/2007.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on November 09, 2017, 04:05:45 PM
I remember one being offered in Pushover during season 31.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Archviler on December 29, 2017, 11:30:44 AM
Has TPIR posted a good quality image of The Prize League? The animated picture of it they used for it, not just a screenshot of everyone in costume. It would be neat to have.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CaptainPrice on February 16, 2018, 07:24:45 PM
Does anyone know which games were retired because of them being disliked by the staff?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on February 17, 2018, 12:08:12 PM
Telephone Game is definitely one- it was retired because it was lame. Give or Keep was also retired because much of the staff didn't like it very much. I think Buy or Sell may be one other to add, I think I remember seeing Roger said it wasn't very popular among the staff.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on March 23, 2018, 07:54:20 PM
I've been watching old episodes of the show and I'm wondering, Why was Give or Keep not put on the turntable?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on March 23, 2018, 08:25:10 PM
Why was Give or Keep not put on the turntable?
Because the Turntable was used for the pairs of prizes. Granted, I'm not sure why they couldn't have designed Give or Keep as a stage game (in a sense, they tried it that way, if you consider the existence of Finish Line), but there's your reason.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on March 29, 2018, 03:50:55 PM
Just a completely random question I thought of when watching Safe Crackers yesterday - at what point is Door #2 opened up to reveal that the game is Safe Crackers? I would imagine not too early as to not spoil anything, but also with how slowly the doors seem to open compared to when they didn't have lights on the front, I can't figure out when they might open it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on March 29, 2018, 05:05:04 PM
I can't speak for the current doors, but back in 2013, it happened roughly at the time that Drew announced the actual retail price of the item up for bids. In other words, not until they knew there was a One Bid winner, but pretty much as soon as they knew there was a One Bid winner.

I'd estimate it takes about five seconds for Drew to say the price, declare the winner, and then for the winner to make their way up the stairs and out of the shot. Add a couple of seconds of the shot lingering on the audience if need be, and I'd think there'd always be adequate time for the doors to reveal enough of the game for the next shot.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on March 29, 2018, 05:40:09 PM
Thanks very much for your response! Yeah, I just know that I don't think I've ever seen it be the case that you can still see the doors opening at the tale end, as you can usually see with Lucky $even, when the camera pans to its game "board."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on March 30, 2018, 02:36:13 PM
Kinda random, but does anyone know if/when they stopped doing the Every Room in the House showcases? I always enjoyed those.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CaptainPrice on June 08, 2018, 06:48:53 PM
I’m honestly not sure. My guess is sometime in the range of 2003-08.

I think this one’s been asked before but does anyone know why Lucky $even didn’t offer another 5-digit car for about six years after the 1986 specials? I think one was offered on the daytime show, but it went back to the 4-digit format until approx. 1992.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on June 08, 2018, 08:56:13 PM
I’m honestly not sure. My guess is sometime in the range of 2003-08.

I think this one’s been asked before but does anyone know why Lucky $even didn’t offer another 5-digit car for about six years after the 1986 specials? I think one was offered on the daytime show, but it went back to the 4-digit format until approx. 1992.
Probably because of how awkward the original 5-digit format for Lucky Seven was, would explain why they stopped using that rule set. Though I'm not sure why it took them six years to devise the current 5-digit format. Thinking about it, and how they usually made the older car games 5-digit-compatible, makes me surprised they didn't use the current rules from the outset.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on September 26, 2018, 11:16:11 AM
I don't know if this has been answered before or if I can find the answer elsewhere, but this is concerning Pick a Pair. Drew always asks which of the two grocery products the contestant wants to keep, in the event that they do not pick a correct pair at the beginning, as they know the price of two already. Is the contestant obligated to match another product up with one of the two known prices, or is the contestant allowed to pick two completely different products?


I know it's better to go with a known product, but was just curious if, for some reason, they didn't want to whether they would be allowed to do that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on September 26, 2018, 02:14:47 PM
Is the contestant obligated to match another product up with one of the two known prices, or is the contestant allowed to pick two completely different products?
I believe they are obligated to match one of the two items they picked on their first turn, and always have been.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on December 16, 2018, 11:39:33 AM
I'm trying to look through the timeline, but unless I missed something, I can't see:

Just totally curious, how long was it before there was a week in which no pricing game was repeated? I'm already into looking at season 4, and I'm reasonably certain it was long before then that that happened.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on December 16, 2018, 01:52:44 PM
I'm pretty sure that's not in the timeline -- off the top of my head, I don't think that's a question I have the answer to (although we could certainly find it).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on December 16, 2018, 03:18:17 PM
I was curious, so I tried to look it up.

The actual answer to the question as worded is Week 41 in Season 1. There were only two episodes in that production week and none of the 6 games repeated.

The answer for a full week might be Week 152 in Season 3 or Week 165 in Season 4. Both of those weeks we only know 14 of the 15 games played, but none of them repeated. If the missing games were repeats then it never happened in the half hour era.

The first confirmed full week of no repeat games is Week 293 in Season 7. Notably, that was the week where Shower Game and It's Optional debuted which seemed to add just enough variety.

I would go with that as the actual answer, but the week actually aired out-of-order due to a preemption so it wasn't the first Monday through Friday of new episodes without a repeat game. That appears to have been Week 359 in Season 8.

Many thanks to the keepers of the calendars.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actual_retail_tice on December 16, 2018, 03:47:29 PM
I was just thinking about why they limited Lucky 7 to 4-digit cars for such a long time, and I was thinking that because of the size of the game it was just too cumbersome to switch back and forth between 4 and 5 digit prices, so they hung onto a 4 digit display for as long as they could.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on December 24, 2018, 10:19:58 PM
Why during the prize descriptions for Take Two and Race Game early on were the prizes described out of linear order? It seemed to go 1-4-2-3 instead of just describing them down the line the way they were introduced as the curtain rose.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Off_trak on December 25, 2018, 12:52:39 AM
Why during the prize descriptions for Take Two and Race Game early on were the prizes described out of linear order? It seemed to go 1-4-2-3 instead of just describing them down the line the way they were introduced as the curtain rose.

To give the cameras a chance to reposition, and reframe the shot.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: thatvhstapeguy on December 27, 2018, 10:06:58 PM
This question has probably been asked before, but what will the show do with the production numbers when they go over 9995K? Just change the letter at the end (i.e. 9995D ---> 0001K)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan9001 on December 27, 2018, 10:40:20 PM
This question has probably been asked before, but what will the show do with the production numbers when they go over 9995K? Just change the letter at the end (i.e. 9995D ---> 0001K)?

They might also do something like 10001K and reclassify everything before that with a leading zero, ie, something like 08493K.  Show 9995K isn’t happening for at least another 4 or 5 years though.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: BBarker on December 30, 2018, 12:24:23 PM
When did the models stop wearing bikinis?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on December 30, 2018, 04:21:32 PM
When did the models stop wearing bikinis?
Total guess on my part, but I'd assume somewhere around 1988 or so, probably so as not to draw attention to the fact that Janice couldn't model them anymore after her camera accident.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperSweeper on December 30, 2018, 05:05:00 PM
Total guess on my part, but I'd assume somewhere around 1988 or so, probably so as not to draw attention to the fact that Janice couldn't model them anymore after her camera accident.

They kept wearing them after that point - based on what I've seen, they stopped around 1992. I've heard rumors that they were eliminated due to the backlash over Dian's first Playboy shoot, but I haven't seen that confirmed.

Bikinis wore brought back on Drew's first (aired) MDS.

Speaking of Janice's supposed swimsuit ban - I've found an episode that shows that the claim is patently untrue. This (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxL00gLOlnk&t=2929s) episode from December 1988 has Janice wearing a swimsuit in the Showcases. With this being right after her return, I'd imagine that she probably kept wearing swimsuits for a while after this point. It's likely she simply stopped because she was getting older.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: BBarker on December 30, 2018, 07:32:16 PM
I remember Phire and Rachel wearing bikinis around 2008-2010. I haven't watched the show all that much since then.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on December 31, 2018, 05:13:58 PM
When did the models stop wearing bikinis?
As a follow-up, when did they start? I don't remember the models wearing them in the early days of TPIR.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on January 08, 2019, 08:20:47 PM
Regarding Spelling Bee: has there ever been an instance of a contestant picking both CAR cards in addition to spelling 'CAR'?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bigblue999 on January 08, 2019, 08:24:46 PM
Regarding Spelling Bee: has there ever been an instance of a contestant picking both CAR cards in addition to spelling 'CAR'?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on January 08, 2019, 10:31:24 PM
Then that makes at least twice it happened, since I seem to recall a male contestant doing the same thing (somewhere around 1994 or 1995). I don't think any video of it is on YouTube, though.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on January 14, 2019, 02:57:16 PM
Regarding Range Game, has there ever been a time that the ARP was in the top $50 or bottom $50 of the range? Is there anything that prohibits the producers from setting it up that way?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on January 15, 2019, 12:39:49 AM
I know it's been in the top quarter on very rare occasions.  I have no way to prove it, but I feel safe saying it's never been in the area the rangefinder starts in for the simple reason that that'd look really stupid.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on January 15, 2019, 07:40:19 AM
Not the bottom $50, but in the S40 premiere (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,18107.0.html) you could have won without the rangefinder moving.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: thatvhstapeguy on January 21, 2019, 12:13:44 PM
I thought of this the other day... when was the last time that Easy as 1-2-3 was played? I personally haven't seen it in a very long time, but I can't always watch the show every day.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on January 21, 2019, 12:38:28 PM
I thought of this the other day... when was the last time that Easy as 1-2-3 was played? I personally haven't seen it in a very long time, but I can't always watch the show every day.
January 3, in the fourth slot, per the TPIR pricing games calendar:

http://tpirstats.com/Season47/Calendar.htm
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on January 28, 2019, 11:27:18 AM
Why does 3 Strikes use the foghorn-style buzzer (aka the Showcase overbid buzzer) for drawing strikes instead of the standard "wrong guess" buzzer?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on January 28, 2019, 11:41:27 AM
To differentiate between a wrong number guess and a strike.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on January 28, 2019, 12:57:16 PM
That makes sense...although it is kind of odd, since all other uses of the foghorn buzzer are for absolute final losses like going over in the SCSD or Showcase. Using it for strikes one and two when the contestant still has a chance to win strikes me (no pun intended) as overly harsh.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on February 11, 2019, 02:08:03 PM
Regarding Range Game, has there ever been a time that the ARP was in the top $50 or bottom $50 of the range? Is there anything that prohibits the producers from setting it up that way?
According to Scorpz's TPIR stats site, since Season 32, the price closest from the bottom of the scale was $150 from the bottom on September 19, 2011.  The price furthest from the bottom of the scale was $498 from the bottom and it happened three times: October 30, 2009, December 2, 2009, and March 4, 2010.

The video from the evil set-up on October 30, 2009 is on Youtube:

http://tpirstats.com/Other/PGStats3.html#rng
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: The Big Wheel on February 20, 2019, 01:48:21 PM
I don't watch the show regularly any more so this may have changed a while back. When did the CBS Pages stop standing at or near contestant's row during taping? Are there any pages in studio at all now?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on March 26, 2019, 02:33:37 PM
Magic #: Suppose the contestant is trying to set the magic number at $2200, but the machine is too sensitive and goes from $2197 to $2204, etc. Now I've heard Drew say in the past something like, "That's good enough." If the contestant ultimately sets the number to $2198, when he wanted $2200, and if the ARP of the low prize is $2199, what would happen? Should said contestant be awarded the prize?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: brosa0 on March 26, 2019, 04:57:13 PM
He would rightly lose.  If he's that worried about, then set it higher.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 26, 2019, 08:00:54 PM
I don't watch the show regularly any more so this may have changed a while back. When did the CBS Pages stop standing at or near contestant's row during taping? Are there any pages in studio at all now?

A month late but they're still there, just farther offstage than they used to be. When there's a chance a contestant that may need assistance wins their One Bid the pages appear magically near the stairs.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on March 30, 2019, 10:44:22 PM
Magic #: Suppose the contestant is trying to set the magic number at $2200, but the machine is too sensitive and goes from $2197 to $2204, etc. Now I've heard Drew say in the past something like, "That's good enough." If the contestant ultimately sets the number to $2198, when he wanted $2200, and if the ARP of the low prize is $2199, what would happen? Should said contestant be awarded the prize?

I say yes, because in this case Drew is directly affecting the gameplay by telling the contestant that $2198 is "good enough" for a $2200 answer.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: b_masters8 on April 27, 2019, 02:41:16 PM
I've heard in many recap reports of games that had "forced wins" and "forced losses." What are "forced wins" and "forced losses"?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on April 27, 2019, 04:44:32 PM
I've heard in many recap reports of games that had "forced wins" and "forced losses." What are "forced wins" and "forced losses"?

A "forced win" is when a game is intentionally set up in such a way that it would be difficult to lose. Example--a Lucky $even price that's something like $14,545. Seems like lots of players guess 5's, so they'd have plenty of money left to buy the car.

A "forced loss" works the same way, except that the game is intentionally set up in such a way that it would be almost impossible to win. Again using Lucky $even--a price like $19,129 would just be plain mean, but it's hard to argue 1s, 2s, and 9s are common guesses.

Some games are tough to do that with, like Dice Game--you're at the mercy of what the player rolls, and no one can control that except the player. But there are others, like Pathfinder, where you can make the SP portion hard, and make it tougher for the player to earn a second chance if they make a mistake on the main game.

Make sense?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on April 27, 2019, 04:57:23 PM
I've heard in many recap reports of games that had "forced wins" and "forced losses." What are "forced wins" and "forced losses"?

A “forced win” is when a game is set up to be unusually easy so that pretty much any contestant would win it as long as they pick the obvious answers.

For example, a Switch setup played for trips to Texas and New York. Or a Push Over setup like “457129083”. Or a Grand Game setup where the two items over the target are both expensive-looking vitamin supplements.

A “forced loss” is when a game is set up so that a contestant picking the obvious-looking will lose. Like, if there’s something insane in the Texas trip to make it cost more than New York. Or if Push Over’s prize ends up being $5712 instead of the more obvious $7129. Or if one of the expensive-looking supplements actually turns out to be under the target.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: b_masters8 on April 27, 2019, 05:37:00 PM
A "forced win" is when a game is intentionally set up in such a way that it would be difficult to lose. Example--a Lucky $even price that's something like $14,545. Seems like lots of players guess 5's, so they'd have plenty of money left to buy the car.

A "forced loss" works the same way, except that the game is intentionally set up in such a way that it would be almost impossible to win. Again using Lucky $even--a price like $19,129 would just be plain mean, but it's hard to argue 1s, 2s, and 9s are common guesses.

Some games are tough to do that with, like Dice Game--you're at the mercy of what the player rolls, and no one can control that except the player. But there are others, like Pathfinder, where you can make the SP portion hard, and make it tougher for the player to earn a second chance if they make a mistake on the main game.

Make sense?

Very much so-- by the definition of a forced win that you provided, it would seem like the Vend-O-Price win on the recent Middle School Kids' Week show would be one, because those packs of cheese were so expensive, that it had to be obvious that the producers wanted that kid cave won (I may be incorrect, though).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on April 27, 2019, 07:23:04 PM
Magic # is a prime example. Being as though most contestants will stop below $2500, it's easy to plan.

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on April 27, 2019, 08:41:22 PM
Magic # is a prime example. Being as though most contestants will stop below $2500, it's easy to plan.

I'm not sure Magic # is the best example, though, because for some reason, people tend to be really bad at it.  I've seriously begun to wonder if they've decided they can make every playing as easy as they want because the contestants will still manage to lose half the time.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on April 29, 2019, 11:28:53 PM
Quote from: b_masters8
Very much so-- by the definition of a forced win that you provided, it would seem like the Vend-O-Price win on the recent Middle School Kids' Week show would be one, because those packs of cheese were so expensive, that it had to be obvious that the producers wanted that kid cave won (I may be incorrect, though).
Yes, that particular playing of Vend-O-Price is a very good example of the concept of a forced win.

A recent playing of Switch? had two trips offered:
It was priced at $9005

This was priced at $5507

Would you SWITCH??

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on June 15, 2019, 11:50:48 AM
I thought I read this somewhere at some point, but do they still use the Contestants' Row monitors do keep tally of the money accumulated in the Money Game so Drew can see?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: AvsFan on July 15, 2019, 09:44:39 PM
Does anyone know what the ARPs of the second- and third-largest prizes in Master Key and Rat Race are, on average (just an approximate figure)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on July 18, 2019, 01:23:53 AM
^The thing about that is that the prizes aren't truly relevant to the gameplay. Essentially, they act as a secondary and tertiary prize as opposed to the big prize, which is usually a car. Like what I did with analyzing Card Game's distribution, you might have to just find the data yourself.

However, resources like qwizx.com or even Adam's recaps sometimes find an exact match, which can help you get a general idea.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Shaymin on October 05, 2019, 11:13:03 AM
Does the Dice Game board still have the possibility to display numbers outside of the 1-6 range even though they haven't needed to in 40+ years?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on October 05, 2019, 12:59:57 PM
Unless they've updated the control panel since this picture (http://www.golden-road.net/gg/displayimage.php?pid=930), the answer appears to be yes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on October 15, 2019, 06:44:39 AM
One thing I'm curious about, simply because of it being noted in the Timeline when it does happen... why is it so rare to see a regular car game, or a small prize game, or a grocery item game, in the fourth slot?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on October 16, 2019, 07:47:17 PM
One thing I'm curious about, simply because of it being noted in the Timeline when it does happen... why is it so rare to see a regular car game, or a small prize game, or a grocery item game, in the fourth slot?

Presumably because the fourth PG leads into the second half of the show. Play a car game fourth, and the second half of the show has already hit its peak, and viewers will tune out until the showcases. Play an SP or GP game there, and you have the opposite problem--a lackluster start to the second half can make viewers tune out just as fast, since they already got their "fix" with the first half.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on October 16, 2019, 10:22:34 PM
Which pricing games currently use the "foghorn buzzer" (AKA "MRRRRP") under any scenario? I know some of them changed recently with the change in the sound system, with some games using the regular buzzer now using the horn buzzer. Obviously, all the timed games, plus Plinko if $0 is won, but can someone list the rest of the games that use it as of now?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on October 19, 2019, 09:24:57 AM
Two travel related questions:
1.  Do you really have to travel from LA when you win a trip, or is that just how the value is calculated?

2.  If you win "a trip around the world" that has 3 different destinations (like on yesterday's showcase), do you really have to take all those trips at once or could you spread them out?

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on October 19, 2019, 10:11:20 AM
Which pricing games currently use the "foghorn buzzer" (AKA "MRRRRP") under any scenario? I know some of them changed recently with the change in the sound system, with some games using the regular buzzer now using the horn buzzer. Obviously, all the timed games, plus Plinko if $0 is won, but can someone list the rest of the games that use it as of now?

Last time Plinko was completely lost, the regular buzzer was played but it was followed by the losing horns.
1) Any timed game, meaning Bonkers, Switcheroo, Time is Money, Clock Game, and Race Game
2) Card Game (originally, the game used the regular buzzer even if the contestant went over)
3) Check-Out
4) Danger Price originally had the foghorn buzzer, but it switched to the regular buzzer
5) Dice Game
6) Grocery Game
7) 1/2 Off
8) Most Expensive
9) One Away
10) Pocket Change
11) Rat Race (if none of the rats finish Top 3, if I recall correctly)
12) Secret “X” (though there are a few occasions where they play the regular buzzer after the board is flipped)
13) 3 Strikes
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: geniusinmath on October 19, 2019, 10:34:19 AM
Which active or retired pricing game is the hardest and easiest?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on October 19, 2019, 11:04:33 AM
Which active or retired pricing game is the hardest and easiest?

By "easiest" and "hardest" I would assume that you mean the greatest and least probability of winning the prize on offer. Easiest would obviously go to Double Prices, as it's a 50-50 shot, and even better if you have a general idea of the prices.

Hardest, however, can go two different ways. My first instinct would be to say Stack the Deck, but when you think about it, any of the luck-based games (Plinko, Punch, etc.) are much greater offenders. Stack can at least be won with an astute knowledge of cars, but on the other hand, Plinko requires you to first win all five chips, which isn't always accomplished, and then have each land in the center slot. Sure, you're gonna win something, but as for winning the full $50K...don't hold your breath.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on October 19, 2019, 11:25:28 AM
Two travel related questions:
1.  Do you really have to travel from LA when you win a trip, or is that just how the value is calculated?

2.  If you win "a trip around the world" that has 3 different destinations (like on yesterday's showcase), do you really have to take all those trips at once or could you spread them out?

1. You can take the trip from anywhere in the US (and possibly the world.) Airfare is calculated out of LA. IIRC from the conversation I overheard in the room where they explain the winnings to each contestant, the contestant who wins the trip doesn't have to worry about whether the price from their home city is more or expensive than the airfare from LA; the show will cover it.

2. I have no inside info on this, but my instinct is that an around the world trip is considered 3 separate trips from LA (or whatever the contestant's home base is.) I don't think you have to take them back to back.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on October 19, 2019, 12:35:44 PM
Which active or retired pricing game is the hardest and easiest?

Clock Game—just do basic binary search and it’s all but a guaranteed win, especially if you already know all prizes are $500-$999. Practice with a friend picking any random number in that range and you should consistently be able to hit it under 15 seconds.

Hit Me (but ONLY if you know there’s always an Ace/10 on the board)—seems like nearly every playing, you could get an instant win picking the only product ending in zero + the only product ending in nine

Magic #: it’s $3,000. Congrats on the win.

Hardest to win is Plinko—you have 99.943% odds of losing after winning five chips and committing to drop them all from the center. (That being said, I’d happily lose if that’s what losing is)

Hardest to win something has to be Bullseye I (especially its first rule set with neither a range nor a rounded price). The only pricing game that never gave away anything.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on October 19, 2019, 01:00:29 PM
Easiest would obviously go to Double Prices, as it's a 50-50 shot, and even better if you have a general idea of the prices.

I don’t think that’s obvious; Double Prices is far from the only 50-50 game, and there are games with better odds—including a few where you’re far more likely to win than 50-50.

One more “guaranteed win” is Now or Then. Pick NOW on any 3 items in a row without regards to the price. Either 1) you’ll win, 2) you’ll find two THENs (which means there are no more THENs on the board and you will win by picking NOW on the other three), or 3) you’ll find one THEN and be able to use logic and process of elimination to make sure you get the price opposite the one THEN correct and get three in a row. Just pray the time you get up isn’t the first time in decades the producers use more than two THENs.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on October 20, 2019, 09:25:54 PM
2. I have no inside info on this, but my instinct is that an around the world trip is considered 3 separate trips from LA (or whatever the contestant's home base is.) I don't think you have to take them back to back.

I don't know how fulfillment works these days, but for Around the World showcases, the airfare is always listed in the paperwork as one retail price (using the example given, as Los Angeles to Costa Rica to Iceland to Thailand to Los Angeles). And four airplane trips are going to be less expensive than the six airplane trips that would result if the contestant visited each destination separately.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on October 20, 2019, 10:08:30 PM
Last time Plinko was completely lost, the regular buzzer was played but it was followed by the losing horns.
1) Any timed game, meaning Bonkers, Switcheroo, Time is Money, Clock Game, and Race Game
2) Card Game (originally, the game used the regular buzzer even if the contestant went over)
3) Check-Out
4) Danger Price originally had the foghorn buzzer, but it switched to the regular buzzer
5) Dice Game
6) Grocery Game
7) 1/2 Off
8) Most Expensive
9) One Away
10) Pocket Change
11) Rat Race (if none of the rats finish Top 3, if I recall correctly)
12) Secret “X” (though there are a few occasions where they play the regular buzzer after the board is flipped)
13) 3 Strikes

One of the total Plinko losses (before the sound system was changed) used both the regular and foghorn buzzer at the same time, the former to signify the $0 hit and the latter to signify the game being completely lost.

1) I imagine Hot Seat would use it if the 35 seconds expires as well.
5) Dice Game used to use the regular buzzer
7) As did 1/2 Off (on both wrong SP guesses and empty box reveals)
10) Pocket Change does use the regular buzzer if a $.00 card is revealed unless it's the final card, yes?
11) Rat Race: What about if someone gives a bad guess to the third prize and fails to earn any rats?


I recall these games using the foghorn buzzer in the Barker and early Drew eras. Did those games change to the regular buzzer as Danger Price did?

- Balance Game ('06)
- Barker's Bargain Bar (not sure if the foghorn carried over to Bargain Game)
- Check Game (even if the total was under, not over)
- Gas Money
- More or Less
- Take Two (only if lost on the second pick, first wrong pick uses the regular buzzer)

I know I could just go on YouTube and search for lost playings of these games, but I have sensory issues and certain game show sound effects don't sit well with me. I can handle the regular buzzer just fine, but not the foghorn buzzer, so when I watch, I have to mute during certain games, second spins in the Showcase Showdown (I used to think they also sounded the foghorn if someone lost with a total too low - I didn't realize they didn't sound any buzzer at all until just a few years ago), and the Showcase reveals. So that's why I am asking all this, and I appreciate the answers.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on October 23, 2019, 08:40:29 AM
1. You can take the trip from anywhere in the US (and possibly the world.) Airfare is calculated out of LA. IIRC from the conversation I overheard in the room where they explain the winnings to each contestant, the contestant who wins the trip doesn't have to worry about whether the price from their home city is more or expensive than the airfare from LA; the show will cover it.

2. I have no inside info on this, but my instinct is that an around the world trip is considered 3 separate trips from LA (or whatever the contestant's home base is.) I don't think you have to take them back to back.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on October 23, 2019, 09:05:37 AM
Thanks!

No problem, but make sure you read Scott's message which was below mine:

I don't know how fulfillment works these days, but for Around the World showcases, the airfare is always listed in the paperwork as one retail price (using the example given, as Los Angeles to Costa Rica to Iceland to Thailand to Los Angeles). And four airplane trips are going to be less expensive than the six airplane trips that would result if the contestant visited each destination separately.

He used to work for the show, so you should trust his post much more than you trust mine :).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on October 23, 2019, 10:32:53 AM
One of the total Plinko losses (before the sound system was changed) used both the regular and foghorn buzzer at the same time, the former to signify the $0 hit and the latter to signify the game being completely lost.

1) I imagine Hot Seat would use it if the 35 seconds expires as well.
5) Dice Game used to use the regular buzzer
7) As did 1/2 Off (on both wrong SP guesses and empty box reveals)
10) Pocket Change does use the regular buzzer if a $.00 card is revealed unless it's the final card, yes?
11) Rat Race: What about if someone gives a bad guess to the third prize and fails to earn any rats?


I recall these games using the foghorn buzzer in the Barker and early Drew eras. Did those games change to the regular buzzer as Danger Price did?

- Balance Game ('06)
- Barker's Bargain Bar (not sure if the foghorn carried over to Bargain Game)
- Check Game (even if the total was under, not over)
- Gas Money
- More or Less
- Take Two (only if lost on the second pick, first wrong pick uses the regular buzzer)

I know I could just go on YouTube and search for lost playings of these games, but I have sensory issues and certain game show sound effects don't sit well with me. I can handle the regular buzzer just fine, but not the foghorn buzzer, so when I watch, I have to mute during certain games, second spins in the Showcase Showdown (I used to think they also sounded the foghorn if someone lost with a total too low - I didn't realize they didn't sound any buzzer at all until just a few years ago), and the Showcase reveals. So that's why I am asking all this, and I appreciate the answers.

1) Once a player nearly ran out of time on Hot Seat and I heard the end of the song. I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t a buzzer at the end of the track.
5) Yup, now they changed it.
7) Yup. I almost think it’s a matter of time until games like Stack the Deck and Cover Up do that too.
10) Yup, Pocket Change uses the regular buzzer uncovering the $0.00 card on Pocket Change, but the foghorn plays regardless of the card revealed if the game is lost
11) I imagine it would be akin to Secret X. I’ve seen playings where Secret X players got both small products wrong, thus not being able to reveal the Secret X and hear the foghorn, and they heared the regular buzzer followed by the losing horns.

1) Balance Game 2006 uses the regular buzzer to the best of my knowledge.
2) I’m fairly certain Bargain Game uses the regular buzzer, although I’ll have to check.
3) Check Game now uses the regular buzzer for both underbids and overbids, but I just wanna make sure.
4) Gas Money uses the regular buzzer.
5) More or Less? uses the regular buzzer, played with the losing horns if the player loses on the first prize.
6) The most recent playing of Take Two had the regular buzzer played both times.

Certain sound effects don’t sit well with me either, and I’m not particularly keen on the foghorn buzzer either.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on October 29, 2019, 06:06:50 PM
If it's even allowed, could I go to two tapings in one day, or does the waiting portion of the second taping overlap with the taping of the first?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on October 29, 2019, 08:40:16 PM
You can go to two tapings in one day as long as they're about 5 hours apart. (For example, if the tapings are at 8:30, 12, and 3:30, you could go to the 8:30 and 3:30 tapings). The only catch is they ask you to get a ticket only for the first show, and then if there's room, they'll let you back in line for the second one.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on October 31, 2019, 02:30:13 AM
Protip--specifically ask the page or one of the OCA members as you're walking out if there are any seats for the next taping. Even if George doesn't specifically ask for returnees at the end of the taping, there's still a chance there might be a few seats left and they can squeeze you in. Only catch is there is no guarantee your group will be able to sit together in the studio, and your seats will obviously not be as good.

You do the whole process again from just after the green screen photo, including a fresh interview with Stan, and contestants who weren't picked in the day's first taping have gotten picked in the second.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: thatvhstapeguy on November 06, 2019, 01:06:19 AM
Does Ten Chances use whiteboards, or do they load up each slot with a fresh piece of cardstock or other paper-type material?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on November 06, 2019, 01:30:37 AM
Does Ten Chances use whiteboards, or do they load up each slot with a fresh piece of cardstock or other paper-type material?
I'd assume paper of some kind, since I've seen players scribble over what they were writing in order to change their guess (i.e., if they repeat a digit, etc.), rather than erasing it (as you could on a dry-erase board).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on November 06, 2019, 09:24:50 AM
Yes, they still use paper. On a recent playing (https://youtu.be/N-c6msqcT2g) of 10 Chances (jump to 36:03) a contestant used a number twice in the price of the car. She scribbled out her guess, eventually prompting Drew to flip the card over.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mellongraig on November 06, 2019, 11:02:34 AM
1) Once a player nearly ran out of time on Hot Seat and I heard the end of the song. I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t a buzzer at the end of the track.
5) Yup, now they changed it.
7) Yup. I almost think it’s a matter of time until games like Stack the Deck and Cover Up do that too.
10) Yup, Pocket Change uses the regular buzzer uncovering the $0.00 card on Pocket Change, but the foghorn plays regardless of the card revealed if the game is lost
11) I imagine it would be akin to Secret X. I’ve seen playings where Secret X players got both small products wrong, thus not being able to reveal the Secret X and hear the foghorn, and they heared the regular buzzer followed by the losing horns.

1) Balance Game 2006 uses the regular buzzer to the best of my knowledge.
2) I’m fairly certain Bargain Game uses the regular buzzer, although I’ll have to check.
3) Check Game now uses the regular buzzer for both underbids and overbids, but I just wanna make sure.
4) Gas Money uses the regular buzzer.
5) More or Less? uses the regular buzzer, played with the losing horns if the player loses on the first prize.
6) The most recent playing of Take Two had the regular buzzer played both times.

Certain sound effects don’t sit well with me either, and I’m not particularly keen on the foghorn buzzer either.

To me, I'm not a fan of the current regular buzzer due to the harshness of the sound which has been in place since 1991 (even though they've softened it a bit in the final years of the Barker era and all of the Carey era, it still sounds the same). I do know that from the mid 80s up to the early-mid 90s a lot of games used both sounds for losses, sometimes interchangeably from one sound to another after one loss to the next. Even Card Game did use the foghorn for overbids from the game's debut up until about the mid 90s or so.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Teddy on November 06, 2019, 12:48:11 PM
One Away also used the regular buzzer until the current SFX automation began in 2013.

Safe Crackers, Blank Check/Check Game, Pick-a-Pair and Five Price Tags (whenever a NO was revealed) once used the foghorn buzzer, but they have all been changed to the regular buzzer (same goes for Danger Price and More or Less).

There was a time when a handful of games used both buzzers interchangeably, mostly during the late 80s and early 90s; the most notable examples were GP games, like Check-Out, Grocery Game, Grand Game and the retired $uper $aver.

Bargain Game still uses the foghorn buzzer whenever it is lost; it and Most Expensive have been known to use the regular buzzer in the past, which does not fit either game at all.

Speaking of no buzzer for time running out in Hot Seat, I remember when this was true for Switcheroo until it was changed near the end of Barker's run as host.

On the unusual side of things, I've heard the foghorn sounded for losses in 1 Right Price, Double Prices, Hi Lo and Money Game (with the first three usually using the regular buzzer, while Money Game uses neither), and the regular buzzer in Lucky $even and Any Number (where the ding and losing horns are used instead).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on November 08, 2019, 05:21:14 AM
I'm sure nobody would ever do this, but if the first two people to spin the wheel went over, could the third person theoretically spin twice to try to get $1 or will they only allow one spin in that scenario?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on November 08, 2019, 09:28:18 AM
If the third spinner doesn't get a dollar on their first spin they aren't allowed to spin again.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mellongraig on November 13, 2019, 09:36:09 PM
If the third spinner doesn't get a dollar on their first spin they aren't allowed to spin again.

Unless if the big wheel does not go all the way around, in that case a re-spin would be necessary.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on November 14, 2019, 08:53:45 PM
How is Drew "informed" which showcase price to reveal first?   Obviously the producers have him go in the order that will cause the most drama (when possible), but how is he told?  He acts like he looks at something on the podiums.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on November 14, 2019, 08:58:43 PM
IIRC, Drew goes backstage during that commercial break. I'm sure he is told who to start with there.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: moneygamelover on November 14, 2019, 09:22:19 PM
Along those lines, aren't any DSWs always supposed to be revealed 2nd?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on November 14, 2019, 09:26:39 PM
Along those lines, aren't any DSWs always supposed to be revealed 2nd?

Unless you can think of a scenario in which a DSW revealed first would create a more dramatic reaction...yes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Shaymin on November 14, 2019, 09:32:19 PM
Re: revealing a DSW-caliber bid first, I'd have to think the only way that would happen would be if both contestants were in DSW range.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan9001 on November 14, 2019, 09:43:15 PM
Say that the following happens during the showcase showdown:
-Both Player A and Player B get $1.00, therefore starting a bonus spinoff; Player C loses by normal means
-during the bonus spinoff, Player A spins the wheel, but doesn't get it all the way around


The rule during a typical single person bonus spin is that your spin doesn't count and you're not allowed to spin again.  What would this rule mean for Player A in the above scenario?  Would they be eliminated right then and there, with Player B winning by default (and still getting their bonus spin of course)?  Would they get an effective score of 0, and be eliminated if Player B successfully gets the wheel around, and engage in a non-bonus spinoff if Player B also fails to get the wheel around?  Or would something else happen?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on November 14, 2019, 09:45:05 PM
Say that the following happens during the showcase showdown:
-Both Player A and Player B get $1.00, therefore starting a bonus spinoff; Player C loses by normal means
-during the bonus spinoff, Player A spins the wheel, but doesn't get it all the way around


The rule during a typical single person bonus spin is that your spin doesn't count and you're not allowed to spin again.  What would this rule mean for Player A in the above scenario?  Would they be eliminated altogether, with Player B winning by default (and still getting their bonus spin of course)?  Would they get an effective score of 0, and be eliminated if Player B successfully gets the wheel around, and engage in a non-bonus spinoff if Player B also fails to get the wheel around?  Or would something else happen?

I've seen this happen before, at least once during the Barker years. It works like this: if in the event of a bonus spinoff, if a contestant doesn't get the wheel all the way around, they have to spin again but it doesn't count for the bonus spin; whatever the wheel stops on is what goes on the scoreboard for the spinoff.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan9001 on November 14, 2019, 09:47:07 PM
I've seen this happen before, at least once during the Barker years. It works like this: if in the event of a bonus spinoff, if a contestant doesn't get the wheel all the way around, they have to spin again but it doesn't count for the bonus spin; whatever the wheel stops on is what goes on the scoreboard for the spinoff.
Ah, makes sense.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on November 14, 2019, 09:49:33 PM
Re: revealing a DSW-caliber bid first, I'd have to think the only way that would happen would be if both contestants were in DSW range.

Unless one of them has a WSD. There are only two choices regarding which one to reveal first, either:

A) The DSW is revealed first, putting much pressure on the opponent to beat the DSW, but when the second bid is revealed, it creates an anti-climax (as you would think that the better DSW would be revealed second), or,

B) The WSD is revealed first, which creates tension via the fact that there very well could be a DOB and even a WSQ.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on November 14, 2019, 09:55:44 PM
WSQ

A what?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on November 14, 2019, 10:00:50 PM
Sorry, I'm thinking I'm in CSS  :D A WSQ is when both players are over by less than $250 from each of their showcases. So named because it's QSW (quadruple showcase winner - double showcase winner x2) backwards, which is when each player is less than $250 away from their respective showcase, but neither goes over.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on November 14, 2019, 10:06:38 PM
I've seen this happen before, at least once during the Barker years. It works like this: if in the event of a bonus spinoff, if a contestant doesn't get the wheel all the way around, they have to spin again but it doesn't count for the bonus spin; whatever the wheel stops on is what goes on the scoreboard for the spinoff.
There was a show in season 31, the November 27 show, where a contestant did not get the wheel all the way around in a bonus spin/spinoff and was disqualified without being able to spin again to have a score for the spinoff. http://tpirstats.com/Season31/November/27.html (http://tpirstats.com/Season31/November/27.html)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ThomHuge on November 14, 2019, 10:35:40 PM
Sorry, I'm thinking I'm in CSS  :D

Let's keep CSS terms in the CSS section, shall we? CSS is like HYO--not all of us spend time in those sections.

There was a show in season 31, the November 27 show, where a contestant did not get the wheel all the way around in a bonus spin/spinoff and was disqualified without being able to spin again to have a score for the spinoff. http://tpirstats.com/Season31/November/27.html (http://tpirstats.com/Season31/November/27.html)

The time I'm thinking of was when the red carpet in front of the wheel was just dots (in other words, a LONG time ago) so it's entirely possible I'm misremembering.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on November 14, 2019, 10:57:37 PM
Re: revealing a DSW-caliber bid first, I'd have to think the only way that would happen would be if both contestants were in DSW range.

And that did once in the 70's with the $30 vs. $29 situation, would that have been the only time? I'm tending to assume so.....but probably wrong lol.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on November 15, 2019, 01:16:48 PM
How is Drew "informed" which showcase price to reveal first?   Obviously the producers have him go in the order that will cause the most drama (when possible), but how is he told?  He acts like he looks at something on the podiums.
IIRC, Drew goes backstage during that commercial break. I'm sure he is told who to start with there.

I'll assume it still works this way...

Along with Drew and a producer, one of the people backstage who is learning which price to reveal first is the person who holds the cue cards so Drew can remember what each showcase was ("You had a year's supply of coffee, a trip to Kona, and a Hyundai Kona"). As the show comes out of commercial, that person holds up the card with the first showcase whose price should be revealed, and at the top of the card is the generic identifier that's on the showcase displays (HAWAII/SUV). Drew is looking at the showcase display to make sure he's at the one that matches the cue card that matches the first price to reveal.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on November 15, 2019, 01:24:37 PM
And that did once in the 70's with the $30 vs. $29 situation, would that have been the only time? I'm tending to assume so.....but probably wrong lol.

This wasn’t a DSW but I recall an episode from the eighties where the first contestants difference was only about $300 or so, leaving me to think the second contestant was even closer, however the second contestant missed by a few thousand
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mellongraig on November 15, 2019, 11:10:57 PM
Sometimes especially during the Barker years Bob would poll the audience to determine who has won by virtue of applause/cheer and then start accordingly from there. That seemed more common in the 80s and a lesser extent in the 90s.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on November 16, 2019, 12:02:18 AM
The time I'm thinking of was when the red carpet in front of the wheel was just dots (in other words, a LONG time ago) so it's entirely possible I'm misremembering.
There's also been at least once where the person that didn't get the wheel all the way around in a spin-off did get to spin again to have a spin-off score. There was a lot of flack for Bob disqualifying the contestant in the season 31 incident since it went against what had been done prior and was unfair to the contestant.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on November 16, 2019, 01:57:20 AM
It's possible that sometime between the earlier incident and Season 31, they realized they didn’t a rule for that situation and officially changed/added “it doesn’t count and you don’t get to spin again" to the spinoff rules.

But the more likely explanation is Bob had a senior moment, and either nobody in the production caught it, or nobody wanted to stop tape to correct the EP on the air.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on December 11, 2019, 09:26:39 PM
When talking about the "zero rule" in 10 Chances, some fans add, "If 0 isn't a choice, then the last number is 5."

Do we know the last playing where this was the case? Seems like it's been so long it's not even worth mentioning anymore.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on December 11, 2019, 11:09:23 PM
I'm not sure exactly when it was, but it's gotta be about 20 years at this point.  I'm thinking either Season 28 or Season 29.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mellongraig on December 16, 2019, 04:36:16 AM
Going back to the buzzer situation, in Lucky Seven early on it was common to hear the regular buzzer go off when the contestant went broke in 1973 and early 1974. By the time Season 3 came (and maybe earlier than that, but later in 1974 for sure), the regular dings were heard and only then afterwards the buzzer would be used in exceptional circumstances just like Any Number as well for example.

I've seen instances in the 80s where Blank Check/Check Game (for underbids and overbids), Safe Crackers, Pick a Pair, Secret X, among others used the regular buzzer too for losses even if it wasn't the primary sound that was used (or in cases alternated between the two buzzers like Pick a Pair being akin to Take Two).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on December 30, 2019, 03:45:45 PM
Anyone have a list of all the known playings of Plinko where no money was won, and how many chips the player had?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: moneygamelover on January 15, 2020, 12:40:27 AM
About how fast does the money count down during the 2nd part of Time is Money? During today's show Drew stated that it was about $1000 every 2 seconds. Is that about accurate?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on January 15, 2020, 03:37:32 AM
I could have sworn that the time clock started off fast and slowed down as it got closer to $0, so I found a few videos of recent playings and did a frame-by-frame analysis. Nope. I was dead wrong, the clock runs at the same rate whether it's at $19,500 or $500.

Here's what else I learned:


The money clock, however, does not match the 29.97 FPS that NTSC shows are shot and broadcast at. It runs at 16 frames per second. It repeats the same pattern every half second; or, in other words, 8 different numbers are flashed on the money clock every half second, each one $30-32 less than the number that was flashed before.

Put simply: The money clock repeats the same 8-number sequence that knocks off $250 in half a second, 80 times in a playing.

Interestingly, that 8-number sequence doesn't seem to start in the same place or contain the same numbers every playing. For example, in one playing it went [8000; 7969; 7938; 7906....7500; 7469; 7438; 7406...], and in another it went [8008; 7976; 7946; 7914...7508; 7476, 7446, 7414...] The first sequence results in nice, round amounts being winnable like $14,000, $8,500, or $5,250; the second sequence produces numbers like $14,008 and $8,508 and $5,258. Why does it do this? Darned if I know, but I thought it was interesting.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on January 15, 2020, 10:56:39 AM
Before the age of the internet and reruns on GSN, how were winning records and ‘historic moments’ documented? One example I can think of is I’ve heard there was a near full Plinko win sometime in the late 80s/early 90s but I’m not able to find any information other than the fact it happened. Was it one of those moments where someone vividly recalls it happening and it gets passed on via word of mouth? Same thing with the supposed $0 difference from the 70s and a moment from the late 80s where both contestants showcase bids were less than $100 or even just biggest winners and double showcase winners.

What was the deal with Make Your Move’s rule change early in its incarnation? Why was it not played during the second half of its premiere season? Same question for pick-a-pair, bargain game, card game and check game’s long absences.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on January 15, 2020, 02:28:44 PM
I could have sworn that the time clock started off fast and slowed down as it got closer to $0, so I found a few videos of recent playings and did a frame-by-frame analysis. Nope. I was dead wrong, the clock runs at the same rate whether it's at $19,500 or $500.

Here's what else I learned:

  • The time clock runs exactly 40 seconds each time.
  • $1,000, exactly to the dollar, is run off exactly every two seconds.
  • Exactly $500 to the second.
  • Exactly $250 is run off every half second.

The money clock, however, does not match the 29.97 FPS that NTSC shows are shot and broadcast at. It runs at 16 frames per second. It repeats the same pattern every half second; or, in other words, 8 different numbers are flashed on the money clock every half second, each one $30-32 less than the number that was flashed before.

Put simply: The money clock repeats the same 8-number sequence that knocks off $250 in half a second, 80 times in a playing.

Interestingly, that 8-number sequence doesn't seem to start in the same place or contain the same numbers every playing. For example, in one playing it went [8000; 7969; 7938; 7906....7500; 7469; 7438; 7406...], and in another it went [8008; 7976; 7946; 7914...7508; 7476, 7446, 7414...] The first sequence results in nice, round amounts being winnable like $14,000, $8,500, or $5,250; the second sequence produces numbers like $14,008 and $8,508 and $5,258. Why does it do this? Darned if I know, but I thought it was interesting.

$250 in half a second, so $31.25 every 1/16 (0.0625) seconds. Of course, the money clock is only integers, so the clock likely decreases in a cycle of $31-$31-$31-$32.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on January 15, 2020, 02:40:24 PM
Interestingly, that 8-number sequence doesn't seem to start in the same place or contain the same numbers every playing. For example, in one playing it went [8000; 7969; 7938; 7906....7500; 7469; 7438; 7406...], and in another it went [8008; 7976; 7946; 7914...7508; 7476, 7446, 7414...] The first sequence results in nice, round amounts being winnable like $14,000, $8,500, or $5,250; the second sequence produces numbers like $14,008 and $8,508 and $5,258. Why does it do this? Darned if I know, but I thought it was interesting.

That is interesting. I wonder whether the computer running the game is tracking button presses down to the millisecond. So while the monitor can only display one dollar amount per frame during the countdown, when the contestant presses the button, the computer determines exactly what the money should be and displays that number. Then, when the countdown is resumed, the display starts subtracting $31/$32 from the most recent stopping point.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 15, 2020, 05:19:46 PM
The money clock, however, does not match the 29.97 FPS that NTSC shows are shot and broadcast at. It runs at 16 frames per second. It repeats the same pattern every half second; or, in other words, 8 different numbers are flashed on the money clock every half second, each one $30-32 less than the number that was flashed before.

Wouldn't it be better to do a frame-by-frame analysis of an actual TV airing since Price is aired in 60 FPS? CBS.com downscales it to 30, but if you use a good capture device to capture it live on CBS, you should be able to play it back in the better framerate.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 15, 2020, 05:43:10 PM
Before the age of the internet and reruns on GSN, how were winning records and ‘historic moments’ documented? One example I can think of is I’ve heard there was a near full Plinko win sometime in the late 80s/early 90s but I’m not able to find any information other than the fact it happened.

It did happen, November 30, 1990. Contestant won $21,000 out of a then possible $25,000. The FAQ has it listed. Still no video of it though out there. I'd love to see it eventually personally, as I suspect others here might too.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 15, 2020, 05:50:18 PM
It did happen, November 30, 1990. Contestant won $21,000 out of a then possible $25,000. The FAQ has it listed. Still no video of it though out there. I'd love to see it eventually personally, as I suspect others here might too.

Bob alluded to this when the record total was about to be broken in terms of actual winnings after the center slot permanently increased to $10K. ("The most anyone's won in Plinko is $21,000 - four chips in the $5,000, one in the $1,000") Of course, this remains the "best" playing of the game to date despite the changes in values.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on January 15, 2020, 06:01:33 PM
Wouldn't it be better to do a frame-by-frame analysis of an actual TV airing since Price is aired in 60 FPS? CBS.com downscales it to 30, but if you use a good capture device to capture it live on CBS, you should be able to play it back in the better framerate.

In theory, but I don't have that at the moment. ;-) I'm a cable-cutter and my CBS streaming service is only 30fps.

$250 in half a second, so $31.25 every 1/16 (0.0625) seconds. Of course, the money clock is only integers, so the clock likely decreases in a cycle of $31-$31-$31-$32.

The amount subtracted always seems to be in this order: $31-$31-$32-$31-$31-$32-$30-$32, repeated. It's nearly identical to "what it it eliminated $31.25 every time, and then rounded the amount to the nearest dollar", except the last two numbers in the eight-number sequence are respectively $1 higher and $1 lower than they ought to be. You can almost break it into a perfect quarter-second, 4-number $125 loop, but it fails to correctly predict the last two numbers in every other loop.

That is interesting. I wonder whether the computer running the game is tracking button presses down to the millisecond. So while the monitor can only display one dollar amount per frame during the countdown, when the contestant presses the button, the computer determines exactly what the money should be and displays that number. Then, when the countdown is resumed, the display starts subtracting $31/$32 from the most recent stopping point.

I thought that too, but it doesn't seem to be the case. The same amounts are displayed on every $250 loop, whether the button is hit or not.

So I went to tpirstats to see some of the odd amounts that have been won. I think that revealed the answer.

There are only three sequences, all with perfect $250 loops.

a) One loops perfectly on every $1000/$750/$500/$250 amount.
b) One loops $8 higher, on every $1008/$758/$508/$258 amount.
c) One loops $8 lower, on every $992/$742/$492/$242 amount.

On loop a, the first amount removes $31, going from $20,000 to $19,969, immediately beginning the 31-31-32-31-31-32-30-32 loop. When the clock runs out, it follows the normal $250-$219-$188-$156-$125-$94-$64-$32-$0 pattern.
On loop b, the first amount removes $54 ONLY when starting the clock, going from $20,000 to $19,946, and from then on looping perfectly through that $250 8-number sequence until ending with $258-$226-$196-$164-$133-$102-$70-$39-$8-$0.
On loop c, the first amount removes $39 on the first amount ONLY, going from $20,000 to $19,961, and from then on looping perfectly through that $250 8-number sequence until ending with $274-$242-$211-$180-$148-$117-$86-$54-$24-$0.

Pulled in those playings and counted the money clock frame-by-frame and every playing seems to match up perfectly with one of those three patterns.

And as one final note, all of this applies to all the playings I analyzed from S47 and S48, but at some point it was changed to this pattern from something different. Some S46 playings have winning amounts that appear to be off by about $2, and when I looked at one from 2014 the clock ran much more smoothly, to the point where the tens digit changed every frame and I couldn't make out the ones digit on a freeze frame.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on January 15, 2020, 07:15:12 PM
Gamesurf, I remember making a post about this a few months back. It seemed, in the early stages of the game’s history, the clock actually looked like it decreased by $1 every  2 milliseconds. It probably must’ve been a nightmare to run it on the computer, which is probably why they changed it to the current average of $31.25 per 1/16 second.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PatrickRox80 on February 01, 2020, 01:11:44 PM
What will replace the "K" on the production codes? The first one starting with 9 just aired this past week.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on February 17, 2020, 05:40:23 PM
At the end of each taping they draw a door prize of $100. If you were a previous contestant within the last ten years and you go to a taping just to watch, and you just so happen to win the door prize, are you still eligible to win the $100?

Just curious because I'm planning on taking a few friends out to LA next year and, while I won't be eligible for another 8 years, 9 months, 3 weeks, and 3 days (not that I'm counting, or anything), and think it would be neat to snag an extra $100 just for attending a taping.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on March 05, 2020, 10:18:59 AM
I have a question regarding the rules of Card Game. Maybe they explain this and I just don’t pay enough attention, but is there anything stopping you from continually drawing cards until you draw the Ace and then making the price whatever you think it should be? Or is there a rule that once you get the Ace you can pick any number you want but it can’t be a number lower than the current price based on the previous cards drawn?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on March 05, 2020, 10:47:07 AM
The way the ace actually works is you can make the ace any number that will be added to your total. Back in the Bob days contestants had to do a little bit of math to figure out how much they want to add to their total.


You can not make the ace a negative number, so no subtracting from your total.


You could also hold on to the ace and use it after drawing some other cards if you wanted but I don't think anyone has done that in quite a long time.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on March 05, 2020, 12:43:44 PM
Back in the Bob days contestants had to do a little bit of math to figure out how much they want to add to their total.

No, they didn't.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on March 05, 2020, 01:38:48 PM
One thing I'm curious about... I know there's details in the Timeline about things like
* the first non-Golden Road 5-digit car
* when each car game started offering 5-digit cars (and when their final 4-digit cars were)
* when the final 4-digit Showcase was

But I'm surprised there's nothing on when the first 5-digit Showcase was. Do we know when that happened?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperSweeper on March 05, 2020, 04:08:37 PM
One thing I'm curious about... I know there's details in the Timeline about things like
* the first non-Golden Road 5-digit car
* when each car game started offering 5-digit cars (and when their final 4-digit cars were)
* when the final 4-digit Showcase was

But I'm surprised there's nothing on when the first 5-digit Showcase was. Do we know when that happened?

The absolute latest it would be would be the spring of 1975. On Carlos’s old YouTube channel, he had a clip of a cat-themed Showcase from that time that had both a Toyota Corolla and a Jaguar XKE. And yes, this was a daytime episode.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on March 07, 2020, 01:06:31 AM
No, they didn't.
I thought I remembered a clip of someone accidentally bidding more than they meant to, but I'm probably just confusing it with something else. My bad.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on March 08, 2020, 12:53:52 AM
The way the ace actually works is you can make the ace any number that will be added to your total. Back in the Bob days contestants had to do a little bit of math to figure out how much they want to add to their total.

No, they didn't.

They didn't/don't?  Are you saying that, whatever dollar value of the cards you've already drawn, if you draw the ace you can say "I think the total value of the car is X"?

Or am I missing something here?  Because I've always thought it was, if you have, say, $3,200 and you draw the ace, you give Bob/Drew a number, and that number will be added to the $3,200, at which point the gameplay ends and you find out if you won.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on March 08, 2020, 08:01:35 AM
They didn't/don't?  Are you saying that, whatever dollar value of the cards you've already drawn, if you draw the ace you can say "I think the total value of the car is X"?

Or am I missing something here?  Because I've always thought it was, if you have, say, $3,200 and you draw the ace, you give Bob/Drew a number, and that number will be added to the $3,200, at which point the gameplay ends and you find out if you won.

From best I recall, Bob at least at times would tell a contestant who got an Ace, that if they had a price in mind they could give it to him, and the game would stop right then and there. So I'm inclined to believe Steve on this one, it makes the most sense anyway, since it's simpler than forcing them to do math in that moment.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on March 08, 2020, 08:39:16 AM
The way Drew explains it, aces can be 1) any number which will be added to your current total, or 2) the contestant can name a price and stop the game right there. If you want to make the ace a number, I would assume it to be understood to be any positive, whole number (that is, greater than zero with no decimal point). However if you wish to state a price, I have not found anything that says you cannot state a price lower than your current bid, and if that is not allowed perhaps Drew should say so. (Reason that he doesn't, I think, is that such a rule is unnecessary. When the contestant draws another card, it would imply that they believe their current bid is too low and so nobody ever thinks of going lower.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on March 08, 2020, 08:47:28 AM
The way Drew explains it, aces can be 1) any number which will be added to your current total, or 2) the contestant can name a price and stop the game right there. If you want to make the ace a number, I would assume it to be understood to be any positive, whole number (that is, greater than zero with no decimal point). However if you wish to state a price, I have not found anything that says you cannot state a price lower than your current bid, and if that is not allowed perhaps Drew should say so. (Reason that he doesn't, I think, is that such a rule is unnecessary. When the contestant draws another card, it would imply that they believe their current bid is too low and so nobody ever thinks of going lower.)

That would make an interesting wrinkle gotta admit though......and not as if other games don't allow for chances to make changes (Temptation for example). Might be a bit odd here that said, but still an intriguing thought.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 08, 2020, 12:51:16 PM
The problem with allowing aces to be negative is it makes aces so powerful every other card in the deck is irrelevant.

Like spmhan alluded to, a contestant could potentially draw 20, 30, or 40+ cards from the deck looking for an ace and then just bid what they wanted to bid in the first place. That’s a waste of everyone’s time.

It’s fine for a game called “Card Game” to have some dependency on luck of the cards.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on March 08, 2020, 03:42:29 PM
Like spmhan alluded to, a contestant could potentially draw 20, 30, or 40+ cards from the deck looking for an ace and then just bid what they wanted to bid in the first place. That’s a waste of everyone’s time.
Unrelated, but it made me wonder: what is the most amount of cards a contestant has pulled in a single playing?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 08, 2020, 04:41:25 PM
Dunno overall, but the largest in the Drew era was 13 cards, reached twice.

Once was in S43 (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,23879.0.html) during Dream Car week (the contestant went about $4,000 over), the other was in S37 (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,10830.0.html) (where it turned out all 13 draws were needed to win the car).

Neither contestant drew an ace.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on March 09, 2020, 12:29:18 PM
Are there statistics that the show keeps of how often contestants waive the prizes they’ve won and which prizes get rejected the most? Some stuff like electronics or small appliances are almost certainly kept by everyone, but lets say you live in a small apartment and win a giant fridge, or a washer and dryer, or a pool table, or a hot tub, something completely impractical for your situation, more likely than not you’re just going to say thanks but no thanks, right? Especially if you don’t have the means to store whatever it is until you sell it for probably 40% of it’s actual value. Same goes with boats or jet skis I would imagine as well?

The vacations are an interesting one too, I would imagine for a lot of contestants their trip to LA and appearance on TPIR probably is their vacation from work, and it seems unlikely that they’d want or be able to immediately take a jaunt to some other location, and that’s assuming it’s not a trip to someplace they’re meh about traveling to in the first place.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on March 09, 2020, 08:34:20 PM
Ehhhh, I suspect they would deem that unimportant information, and if it is important, most likely confidential. So I would guess, no.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 10, 2020, 01:02:51 AM
There’s no way of knowing which prizes are accepted or declined short of tracking down winners and asking them. That’s not something the show would ever make public.

But if you’re a producer trying to produce “winners” but still control the budget, there might be some logic in offering a $20,000 bathroom hoping that most contestants would turn it down rather than spend $6,000 on taxes for something they don’t really want or need.

Trips do not need to be taken immediately if accepted. They can be taken anytime within one year from the air date.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GasMoney09721007 on March 13, 2020, 09:19:32 AM
What's the record for the most spin-offs in one Showcase Showdown? (Or at the very least, spin-offs that made it to air since at some point I'm sure some had to be cut for time)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan9001 on March 13, 2020, 09:29:21 AM
What's the record for the most spin-offs in one Showcase Showdown? (Or at the very least, spin-offs that made it to air since at some point I'm sure some had to be cut for time)
I don't know if this is the actual record, but 3 is the most I've ever seen, and it's happened at least twice:
https://youtu.be/7fFqiuXoLcA (https://youtu.be/7fFqiuXoLcA)
https://youtu.be/lOPW-m6D01g (https://youtu.be/lOPW-m6D01g)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on March 30, 2020, 10:16:22 AM
When it comes to grocery items, what determines when the show refers to them by their brand name vs. a generic label? For example on Friday’s show a box of Fruit Rollups were called “fruit flavored snack rolls” or a bottle of Asprin might be called “A bottle of pain reliever pills” which a carton of juice might be called “A 12 ounce carton of Minute Maid Pink Lemonade”. Does it just come down to whether or not the brand is a sponsor or not?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on March 30, 2020, 10:50:44 AM
When it comes to grocery items, what determines when the show refers to them by their brand name vs. a generic label? For example on Friday’s show a box of Fruit Rollups were called “fruit flavored snack rolls” or a bottle of Asprin might be called “A bottle of pain reliever pills” which a carton of juice might be called “A 12 ounce carton of Minute Maid Pink Lemonade”. Does it just come down to whether or not the brand is a sponsor or not?

Yes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on April 12, 2020, 07:04:52 PM
Kinda random, but does anyone know if/when they stopped doing the Every Room in the House showcases? I always enjoyed those.

I seem to recall an episode in January 2010 when they did an every room in the house showcase, and it was accompanied by either splendido or that other old cue used for furniture showcases, probably the last time I heard that cue in its full.

Speaking of cues, I've been watching some older episodes from seasons 36 to 40 lately, and I've noticed a complete and utter overhaul of the classic music cues in terms of them completely ridding most of them between season 37 and 38. Why did they do this? I miss those, especially the MGHS one. I recall the last time I heard that was January 3, 2012, Jenny McCarthy's special appearance episode. Was that the last time it was heard or did it survive a bit longer than that? Did any others survive into the 2010s? I sort of remember that old trip cue from the 80s lasting until about 2011 too.  In terms of today, I absolutely hate most of the new cues. Surprised they haven't thrown the 1994 cue from the davidson for multiple prize games down the drain yet for being too "old"
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on April 12, 2020, 07:06:43 PM
Beanstalker is still being used to this day, but that's the only one I know of.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on April 12, 2020, 07:09:32 PM
Beanstalker is still being used to this day, but that's the only one I know of.

An updated version of it though. I don't think they've used the original cue as a part of regular rotation since late 2009, maybe 2010, not counting special episodes like decades week, etc.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on April 12, 2020, 07:14:39 PM
Hmm, then that's probably the case then, most cues being thrown out entirely with the remainder being slightly updated. Pretty sure that's the case with the '94 cue you mentioned (Fortune Hunter cue?) since it doesn't seem to me that the one used currently is the original.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on April 12, 2020, 07:34:28 PM
An updated version of it though. I don't think they've used the original cue as a part of regular rotation since late 2009, maybe 2010, not counting special episodes like decades week, etc.

They’ve also been using remixes of The Big Banana and Cats.

Also are the cues they used for the air hockey table and tool package IUFBs in Friday the 10th’s show from the Barker era?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on April 12, 2020, 08:14:52 PM
They’ve also been using remixes of The Big Banana and Cats.

Also are the cues they used for the air hockey table and tool package IUFBs in Friday the 10th’s show from the Barker era?

I have that episode on tape, I'll have to take a look. I didn't notice any usage of Cats from recent episodes but I may have just missed it. I'm trying to be more attentive when watching to see if I can pick up on these things but sometimes its tough as I watch TPIR while on the treadmill. Other than the older harp cue used in the baby shower episode last year, the only other one I noticed (about a month ago) during the showcase was a sort of updated version of that saxephone type showcase cue from the early 2000's or late 90s, no clue what it's name but usually it played for furniture showcases then and it was played with a car this time.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on April 14, 2020, 12:01:17 PM
Which pricing games overall have the worst win percentage? Not counting stuff like Plinko where a “win” is practically impossible. I know games can be and often are setup to either be won or lost based on typical player strategy, but which games just don’t get won very often? I feel like I almost never see anyone win That’s Too Much, and yesterday’s win was probably only the second or third time I’ve ever seen a win in that one.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on April 14, 2020, 12:28:28 PM
Hot Seat and Pay the Rent are probably the worst you're gonna find. Punchy you might be able to include with Plinko, as there's a 1 in 40 chance of "winning".
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on April 14, 2020, 02:36:58 PM
Thanks to tpirstats.com, you don't have to guess.

Excluding Plinko, between Season 29 through 47, Punch-a-Bunch has the worst win/loss record, at 22-336.

The top (bottom?) 5 worst records are:
Punch-a-Bunch   22-336    6.15%
Pay the Rent     5-75     6.25%
It's in the Bag 26-436    7.39%
Hot Seat         4-41     8.89%
Gas Money       14-126   10.00%
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on April 14, 2020, 02:50:07 PM
If we're only counting the last five seasons (including S48), Temptation is also really bad at 1-34, second only to Punch-a-Bunch at 2-71.

That's Too Much, on the other hand, looks like an absolute cakewalk at 30-97, the 15th most difficult.

The most difficult game that doesn't allow for a bailout or partial win is Stack the Deck at 7-43, the 8th most difficult.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on April 14, 2020, 02:51:43 PM
I feel like Punch a Bunch should also not be included along with Plinko since winning the top prize is entirely luck based.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on April 14, 2020, 03:21:00 PM
I also feel like games that contain an out like Pay the Rent or Hot Seat should be counted differently too since we’re only going to count a win as the top prize, but the majority of players are going to cut out early whether they would have won it all or not
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on April 14, 2020, 03:35:24 PM
I feel like Punch a Bunch should also not be included along with Plinko since winning the top prize is entirely luck based.

I chose to set Plinko aside because it's hundreds of times less likely to be "won" than every other game, not just because it's luck-based.

Plus I'm a heretic who believes that unless you are Ted Slauson, most of the big cash and car games require the contestant to have some degree of luck in order to win. There's not a huge difference between picking which hole to punch and guessing whether the tens digit in Temptation is a 1 or a 3.

I also feel like games that contain an out like Pay the Rent or Hot Seat should be counted differently too since we’re only going to count a win as the top prize, but the majority of players are going to cut out early whether they would have won it all or not

From the data I have (S44-present), the bottom 15:

NameWin PercentageTotal WinsTotal LossesTotal Playings
Punch a Bunch2.74%27173
Temptation2.86%13435
It's In the Bag5.80%46569
Time i$ Money5.80%46569
Hot Seat7.55%44953
Pay the Rent7.89%33538
Gas Money11.54%64652
Stack the Deck14.00%74350
Golden Road15.79%31619
3 Strikes15.79%31619
Triple Play17.65%31417
More or Less18.37%94049
Pathfinder19.30%114657
Switcheroo20.45%93544
That's Too Much!23.62%3097127
Games without a bailout option are in bold. Of those bolded, worth noting that Time is Money, Golden Road, and More or Less still allow for partial wins worth thousands of dollars.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: 123123123 on April 14, 2020, 04:00:45 PM
With roughly the same amount of playings, Temptation being won 3 times less than Pay The Rent in the last 5 seasons is mind boggiling to me.

Anyways, on the topic of pricing games percentages, does anyone know if there are specific win percentages that the show looks for while coming up with new games or rule-tweaking? Of course you can't really use blind probability because of the nature of many games other than quickies, but having a rough set point wouldn't hurt when dealing with more involved car games.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on April 15, 2020, 07:39:32 PM
Does anyone know if there were any one model or one barkers beauty only episodes in the past?

Rachel had an episode last year I believe or maybe 2 years ago whereby I recall she was the only model on duty that day and George had to step in a bit more than usual with his involvement in showing the prizes. I thought it also maybe occurred with Dian in the early 90s but I could be wrong. Any other times where this has occurred?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on April 19, 2020, 01:39:05 PM
Are there any clips or even whole episodes online from October 1985 when Gene Wood filled in for a bit after Johnny Olson passed away?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpirfan28 on April 19, 2020, 02:56:16 PM


Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on April 19, 2020, 03:11:28 PM
Thanks for that. Gene was an iconic game show announcer and his voice will always be synonymous with Richard Dawson Family Feud to me, but he was an awkward fit for TPIR. His voice had a more serious tone to it, very cut and dry while Price demanded an announcer with a more booming jovial tone that would convey the excitement of the show.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GasMoney09721007 on April 20, 2020, 04:39:15 PM
Years ago I read the story of Todd's Dot. As the story goes a contestant named Todd was playing Check Game and like many other contestants was confused on how to play. Supposedly he tried to write on one of the displays and punctured a small hole in it, leaving a tiny mark known as Todd's Dot which remained on the game for many years afterwards. My question is, did this really happen or was it an urban legend? If it is true does anyone know the airdate?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on April 20, 2020, 05:15:14 PM
Years ago I read the story of Todd's Dot. As the story goes a contestant named Todd was playing Check Game and like many other contestants was confused on how to play. Supposedly he tried to write on one of the displays and punctured a small hole in it, leaving a tiny mark known as Todd's Dot which remained on the game for many years afterwards. My question is, did this really happen or was it an urban legend? If it is true does anyone know the airdate?
I don't know if he actually punctured the display (I haven't watched the episode myself), but Timothy did apparently write on th readout. Airdate was October 6, 1997 (episode #0471K).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on April 20, 2020, 06:51:26 PM
This was one of the first episodes I remember watching as a child, from my memory, the dot was definitely visible, but did not damage the display, and was gone the next playing.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on April 20, 2020, 09:20:39 PM
I want to say it was still visible on the next playing before they managed to get it cleaned off.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on April 20, 2020, 11:07:39 PM
I want to say it was still visible on the next playing before they managed to get it cleaned off.

According to tpirstats.com the next playing was 10/24/97. That episode is on YouTube (10/6/97, the date of the playing in question, is not, btw). I just watched the Check Game segment, and there does not seem to be any mark or dot on the display, though that may be due to the poor tape quality.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: temptation1979ga on April 21, 2020, 10:50:08 PM
Years ago I read the story of Todd's Dot. As the story goes a contestant named Todd was playing Check Game and like many other contestants was confused on how to play. Supposedly he tried to write on one of the displays and punctured a small hole in it, leaving a tiny mark known as Todd's Dot which remained on the game for many years afterwards. My question is, did this really happen or was it an urban legend? If it is true does anyone know the airdate?

Ok, I couldn’t figure out how to post pics here, so hopefully this link will work:

https://postimg.cc/gallery/yR5vrr0

And I’m trying to find the playing where Bob mentions Timothy’s dot again. I remember he calls it “Tim’s spot” on that episode, and if my memory isn’t failing me, he says they replaced “the entire cover” for that top display.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on April 21, 2020, 10:52:07 PM
Hopefully these links work...

(https://i.postimg.cc/289xxdY6/240-EE454-E9-CC-419-C-B0-A4-7-D68-B596-CAB0.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/jqZ6s6LX/83-DF6872-15-D6-47-CA-8-F6-B-2-F16317494-C4.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/zDnMpc2f/E0-F663-C5-659-A-4-E08-A9-F5-1779-BA9-EA017.jpg)


FTFY
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: temptation1979ga on April 21, 2020, 10:56:41 PM
Thank you for fixing that.  :-)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: temptation1979ga on April 21, 2020, 11:25:16 PM
Sorry for posting separately, but it was too late to edit. It’s not until the December 3 episode where Bob mentions the Timothy’s dot incident again. He asks the audience if anyone saw the episode where that happened, then he says “I told Tim it would be preserved forever, but evidently they’ve either put a new cover on or they’ve washed it.”

Like Steve mentioned, I could have sworn it was visible on at least one subsequent playing, but I checked all of them and I couldn’t see it on good quality videos.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on April 22, 2020, 12:24:28 AM
Not sure how to word this, but here goes... the price tags used in Double Prices, Most Expensive, 1 Right Price, etc...  I know that when the show started in '72, those tags looked as though the numbers and the dollar signs were stuck onto the surface of the tag (almost like putting magnets on a refrigerator door, is about the best way I can describe it). At some later date (I'm assuming late 80s or early 90s), that changed to the text being printed directly onto the tag itself. Do we know when that element changed?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on April 26, 2020, 06:34:57 PM
What was the reason for the absence of General Motors vehicles from the show for most of 1993 to around 1995? Was it a similar reason to why they no longer offered foreign automobiles after 1992?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on May 05, 2020, 01:12:05 PM
How many times (if it’s ever happened) has Plinko ever ended up being a complete loss, meaning the contestant gets all four prizes wrong, doesn’t win a single extra chip, and the one chip they are given lands on zero? I gotta think it’s happened at least once, right?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on May 05, 2020, 01:54:30 PM
I gotta think it’s happened at least once, right?
I know for a fact it's happened at least once with Drew.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Torgo on May 05, 2020, 02:05:52 PM
I know for a fact it's happened at least once with Drew.

I know for a fact it's happened at least twice with Drew. Jefferying might have happened twice in the same sesson.

Wayo had clips of both at one point.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 05, 2020, 02:13:44 PM
First one was in Season 37 (EDIT: Season 38--misremembered), and the setup was absolutely brutal. All four SPs had an obvious "right" looking answer that turned out to be wrong. This playing should be studied in textbooks as how NOT to set up Plinko.


The second one, in Season 39, was still heartbreaking, but at least the setups were a little more fair. Still clearly a budget mode setup, but not obviously intended to be a wipeout.

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan9001 on May 05, 2020, 05:01:41 PM
How is the so-called "flimsy paper" placed over the holes in Punch a Bunch?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on May 05, 2020, 10:47:47 PM
How is the so-called "flimsy paper" placed over the holes in Punch a Bunch?

The coverings are circles, a little larger than the holes. Each hole is a tube, similar to a big PVC pipe (or maybe each one actually is a modified piece of PVC pipe, I'm not sure), snugly fit inside its own "track." The tube can be pulled all the way out from the back of the board. Once the tube is out, a covering is placed over the front end. Then the tube and covering are pushed back in. The "track" holds the covering in place, allowing it to be punctured without going anywhere.

It's something of an inexact science to center the covering over the end of the tube and then slide it in so the dollar sign is perfectly vertical, which is why the dollar signs aren't completely uniform on the board.

Here's a picture from when the board received special coverings for a 2008 prime time special. You can see a bunch of open holes from where the daytime coverings were removed. On the ground, you can see the shape the round coverings take after they've been scrunched into place.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on May 06, 2020, 01:51:53 AM
Approximately how many times was the Do-It-Yourself showcase format used during the '70s>
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on May 12, 2020, 01:31:47 PM
I may be off the mark here, but I often sense there’s a fair bit of disdain on this forum for trips being offered as prizes. Is there a reason why people here hate the trips so much?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on May 12, 2020, 09:23:47 PM
I don't think it's the trips themselves that's the issue for people, it's how many are offered each episode. Playing more than one pricing game for a trip is excessive, let alone that plus a trip in one even both Showcases.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on May 12, 2020, 10:31:49 PM
I guess I could see that, my issue with the trips is that they’re kind of hit and miss. Some of the trips to out of the way places like many of the Asian countries aren’t really that appealing to me, and a trip to go skiing or spend a week in some remote location in New England sounds like hell to me. They aren’t all awful, but I would bet the trips are probably the prizes most frequently rejected by the winners either due to an inability to get away from work or life, or a total lack of interest in the destination.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on May 12, 2020, 10:41:56 PM
Is there a reason why people here hate the trips so much?

They have a lot of expenses. If you win a trip to somewhere outside of the US, you have to have a passport. Tax on the whole trip must be paid, plus you have to have time off work to take the trip, travelling from your airport of choice to your destination (from Augusta to Hong Kong is at least 24 total hours, including flight time and layovers), and you have to have extra money for spending (my trip to Hong Kong had daily breakfast, but lunch and dinner had to be paid by me). A lot of the excursions offered in the trips are given as cash value (my half-day guided sightseeing tour), so that does help a bit with the taxes.

Oh, and you can sell or gift a trip. I was hoping to win something I could sell (not a trip), a car (I'm a hospice nurse who visits patients in their homes- travelling is essential for me), or something that would be useful to use around the house (not a trip).

I'm sure there are many people who would've loved to have taken that trip to Hong Kong; but, unfortunately, I wasn't one of them. HOWEVER, I did win my pricing game and, for me, that's all that really mattered!  :-)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on May 12, 2020, 11:17:27 PM
Oh, and you can sell or gift a trip.

I think you mean you can NOT sell or gift a trip. As you know, if a contestant wins a trip, they must be one of the people who takes that trip if they don't turn it down.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on May 12, 2020, 11:23:06 PM
Quote from: Plinkoman
Oh, and you can sell or gift a trip.
You mean you CAN'T sell or gift a trip, I think. 

The thing about trips is this:  on the surface, I would be excited to win a trip to somewhere nice!  What an opportunity I wouldn't otherwise have....

...until I actually start to think about and plan the logistics of it. 

Plinkoman is absolutely right (and he would know better than any of us!)  A "free" trip isn't free by any means, unless you're fortunate enough to be retired and can afford all the fees, taxes, and spending money. 

Make no mistake, if I won a trip somewhere, I would do anything in my power to take that trip and enjoy the experience.  Realistically though, my life, work schedule, and financial situation would me it difficult, if not impossible, to take that dream trip - even if it were "free".
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on May 13, 2020, 04:19:03 PM
Yes, I forgot the word 'not.' If I had been able to sell or gift it, I would have.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Spmahn on May 15, 2020, 12:39:45 PM
Does the show have a procedure in place for an instance where an elderly person or someone with mobility issues gets on stage and the next pricing game is something like Race Game or Bonkers? Would they be forced to switch games on the fly, or do they have other accommodations that could be made?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 15, 2020, 01:03:23 PM
In days past it was “play Bonkers & Race Game early, and save any elderly contestants from being called down until after they’re played”.

There’s an anecdote from Stan’s book (Stan Blits is the contestant coordinator who interviews people in line) where he was impressed by an elderly woman in line, and he picked her to Come on Down. During the show, she came on down, made it to the row, and Stan looked at his clipboard to see what was next. In a panic he realized he slipped up—the next game was Bonkers. Their only options at that point were to either pray she didn’t win her IUFB, or to stop tape for 30 minutes and swap out Bonkers for something more suitable. (Lucky for Stan, she didn’t win that IUFB.)

But Bonkers and Race Game tends to frequently played 4th-6th these days, so who knows what they do now—although I certainly hope the answer is not “don’t pick any elderly contestants on days when those games are played”, I can’t recall any in recent memory.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on May 15, 2020, 05:14:41 PM
One day when I was there, Stan interviewed an audience member who was deaf who he wanted to choose as a contestant. As it happened, Clock Game was scheduled to be the sixth game in that episode (and it would put a contestant at a disadvantage if they tried to play Clock Game through an interpreter). The deaf audience member was seventh on the contestant list, and we moved Clock Game to be third and the third pricing game to be sixth.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Alfonzo on May 15, 2020, 06:06:02 PM
I recall a playing of Race Game in which a pregnant woman was a contestant. Bob offered to let Janice play in her place but the lady insisted on playing herself, and she did.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on May 17, 2020, 03:58:00 PM
Is the Bonus Game bonus randomly placed, or could they put it behind a hard product to guess (if in budget mode) or an easy product to guess (if they want a win)?

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 17, 2020, 04:20:57 PM
Is the Bonus Game bonus randomly placed, or could they put it behind a hard product to guess (if in budget mode) or an easy product to guess (if they want a win)?

Non-random. You are correct, they can engineer wins or losses that way.

You can also engineer it so it looks like the contestant has a 3/4 shot of winning but it was a heartbreaking loss, or that they beat the odds and won with only one window, but in reality it isn’t so. The producers know beforehand 3 which SPs are totally irrelevant.

For most games, if something “random” is not obviously randomly generated onstage (Plinko chips dropping, 3 Strikes draws, etc), it’s probably not random and placed with a purpose. Placement of Punch a Bunch prize slips, Spelling Bee & Pass the Buck cards, etc. are all intentional.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on May 17, 2020, 06:03:25 PM
Non-random. You are correct, they can engineer wins or losses that way.

You can also engineer it so it looks like the contestant has a 3/4 shot of winning but it was a heartbreaking loss, or that they beat the odds and won with only one window, but in reality it isn’t so. The producers know beforehand 3 which SPs are totally irrelevant.

For most games, if something “random” is not obviously randomly generated onstage (Plinko chips dropping, 3 Strikes draws, etc), it’s probably not random and placed with a purpose. Placement of Punch a Bunch prize slips, Spelling Bee & Pass the Buck cards, etc. are all intentional.
Fascinating!  And thank you!  What are the places they think you're least likely to punch/pick?  The corners? (for future reference, so I can win the $25,000/car) :) 
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Casey on May 17, 2020, 06:08:58 PM
I recall a playing of Race Game in which a pregnant woman was a contestant. Bob offered to let Janice play in her place but the lady insisted on playing herself, and she did.
By sheer coincidence, I watched this very episode yesterday on the YouTube.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 17, 2020, 06:32:32 PM
Fascinating!  And thank you!  What are the places they think you're least likely to punch/pick?  The corners? (for future reference, so I can win the $25,000/car) :)

Nine and seven years ago (that long, wow) TPIRighteous did a pair of (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,18410.msg318935.html#msg318935) analysis threads tracking each spot. (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,22349.msg395597.html#msg395597) We can only track the spots that get punched, obviously, but the spots most likely to be punched are the corners & the upper-middle part of the board. Least likely are the bottom row.

I’ve always suspected they like to hide the big money in the bottom row, for the same reason grocery stores put the name-brand items at eye level and the cheaper generics at the bottom row.

My personal recommendation would be to try one punch in the top right corner (in case it’s an easy setup) and the others somewhere on the bottom row (in case it isn’t).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on May 17, 2020, 11:32:28 PM
By sheer coincidence, I watched this very episode yesterday on the YouTube.

what episode is that?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on May 20, 2020, 03:43:22 PM
what episode is that?

I was wondering the same lol. I wanted to see it myself when I saw Alfonzo mention it before.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on May 20, 2020, 08:03:52 PM
Just to update, per the FAQ, the episode in question featuring the pregnant woman (named Michelle) is the December 20, 1984 episode for anyone wanting to go back and watch it themselves too.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on May 20, 2020, 10:11:29 PM
Question about the models - what's the most amount of models they've ever had signed on at once? Not on a specific episode but in general.

Is it true that they had 10 models signed on the show at once? That seems like alot.

Rachel, gwen, lanisha, tamiko, phire, brandy, gabby, Shane, amber, manuela. I've seen them all in episodes in late 2008. 10 models at once being on rotation seems way too much.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PookieNumNum on May 21, 2020, 01:37:20 PM
I have a question.  Why are the moderators on this site *such wonderful people?*

Ah, gee, thanks for the compliment. You shouldn't have.

...no, really. You shouldn't have. I see the actually-present mod staff has already taken care of your account, but I don't want that language anywhere near me. Bye. -Army
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on May 21, 2020, 02:06:32 PM
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/8a650dbffd5d35fcfa81816bcff1bbf9/tenor.gif?itemid=13032597)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on May 24, 2020, 05:32:29 AM
Has there been any instance (on half-hour shows) that all three players tied in winnings? If so, how will they determine the top winner and runner-up for the showcase?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpirguyMN on May 24, 2020, 11:42:21 AM
I don't know if it has ever happened, but I would assume they would just do a coin flip?  That is already what they do to determine who spins the wheel first between contestants who have won the same amount.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GR_Man_9009 on May 24, 2020, 12:01:00 PM
I don't know if it has ever happened, but I would assume they would just do a coin flip?  That is already what they do to determine who spins the wheel first between contestants who have won the same amount.
A coin has two sides and there's three people. That doesn't make sense.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on May 24, 2020, 12:04:12 PM
With the difference in prize values I doubt there was ever a tie between all three contestants. Even if none won a pricing game the Item Up for Bids prizes all had difference values. Ties between two contestants happen once a season if even that frequently.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 24, 2020, 12:12:02 PM
A coin has two sides and there's three people. That doesn't make sense.

Easy, just flip twice

Heads then Heads: Player A
Heads then Tails: Player B
Tails then Heads: Player C
Tails then Tails: Flip two more times

But I would be ridiculously surprised if that ever happened (and if it did, whoever set up the prizes so a three-way tie was possible ought to get in big trouble)

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on May 24, 2020, 11:47:47 PM
The answer to how they would break a three-way tie is of course "randomly," although the event is so unlikely, I'm sure the specific randomization method has never been decided upon. If it had happened while I was there, I would have proposed using the 1, 2, and 3 chips from Three Strikes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on May 25, 2020, 01:49:30 AM
I’ve wondered why they wouldn’t just switch the methods used between the Showdown and the showcases - they draw numbers out of a hat during the showcases, why not do that for the Showdown where you might have 3, and leave the coin flip for the showcases where there are only two.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on May 25, 2020, 03:19:39 AM
Now I’m imagining some poor intern mixing them up and getting yelled at backstage

“NO YOU CANT FLIP A COIN TO BREAK TIES IN THE SHOWCASES, THAT’S NOT THE PROTOCOL, NOW PUT IT AWAY AND GO FIND A HAT”
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on May 26, 2020, 12:31:32 AM
The answer to how they would break a three-way tie is of course "randomly," although the event is so unlikely, I'm sure the specific randomization method has never been decided upon. If it had happened while I was there, I would have proposed using the 1, 2, and 3 chips from Three Strikes.

I was thinking, they'd go by who won their games, in cases where 2 people did anyway. That'd make more sense to me. If only 1, or 0 did (if all 3 did they'd not have a tie I'd surmise).....then would need to go to another method though.
Title: It's Optional QuestionS
Post by: JhayPrice on May 27, 2020, 01:04:15 AM
a. In It's Optional, is it true that there are a maximum of 3 choices for 8 options, 4 choices for 9 options, and 5 choices for 10 options?

b. What car model did they use for the 2 cars on the scale on the boards?

Merged into the general questions thread. Not everything needs a new topic. Slightly reworded the question with the relocation of the post so it makes sense.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on May 28, 2020, 11:16:51 PM
Has Roger ever stated why Pick-a-Number was played so infrequently during season 27-35? I've always wondered why it was a rarity during these years, especially since it's a very common game nowadays.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on May 29, 2020, 01:12:17 AM
In fact, Pick-A-Number was played just 2 times on seasons 27 and 28, 3 on season 29, 4 on season 30, 5 on seasons 31 to 33 , 8 on season 34, and 7 on Bob's final season. Maybe it was just because they focus on the newer games on that era? I've never heard any comments from The Dob about that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on May 30, 2020, 09:33:11 PM
I recall Roger in a Q&A he did for the site years ago saying that Pick a Number was played less than other 1-prize games because it took longer to play, and because it was used as a replacement for other games when there was an issue and it couldn't be played.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on June 02, 2020, 08:38:17 AM
When in season 6 did the perfect bid bonus debuted?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 08, 2020, 01:32:06 AM
I recall Roger in a Q&A he did for the site years ago saying that Pick a Number was played less than other 1-prize games because it took longer to play, and because it was used as a replacement for other games when there was an issue and it couldn't be played.

Pick a Number took longer to play? I really can't believe that.....how much time can a game like that eat up vs say Double Prices?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 08, 2020, 02:37:39 PM
Roger didn't even like Pick-a-Number.  I'm pretty sure the reason he didn't play it very often was just, really, why play Pick-a-Number when you could play anything else?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on June 08, 2020, 11:01:01 PM
Timings sometimes changed over the years, so I'm not 100% positive about this, but I'm pretty sure that in Roger's timings, Pick a Number was the same length as Coming or Going, Flip Flop, Side by Side, and Squeeze Play. And all of those are more fun to watch than Pick a Number.

Double Prices stands alone as the shortest-timed game.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on June 09, 2020, 10:56:34 PM
So either I misremembered him saying the game taking longer to play was the reason, or he did say that just to give a reason other than "because I don't like it."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mellongraig on June 10, 2020, 01:39:28 PM
When in season 6 did the perfect bid bonus debuted?

Actually that debuted in Season 5, by May 23, 1977 it was in place, however the exact date may be uncertain due to some episodes having fur coats in them.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on June 14, 2020, 04:28:10 PM
I apologize if I sound really stupid saying this, but what exactly does FFBC stand for? I know it's used for people who stay in "Contestant's Row" the entire show, but I could never figure out what exactly it stood for.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 14, 2020, 04:35:04 PM
I apologize if I sound really stupid saying this, but what exactly does FFBC stand for? I know it's used for people who stay in "Contestant's Row" the entire show, but I could never figure out what exactly it stood for.

First Four Breakfast Club.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on June 15, 2020, 04:18:25 AM
What's the significance of the "Breakfast Club" part of that?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on June 15, 2020, 05:05:56 AM
What's the significance of the "Breakfast Club" part of that?
Probably the fact that the show airs in the morning, when most people are having breakfast.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 15, 2020, 07:21:19 AM
Just thinking of this watching a clip of a DSW win from the late 70's/early 80's....is it possible to know or at least have a rough estimate of how many DSW's the show has had in its' entire history? Or for that matter, how many DOB's? Might be a long shot to figure out, but was curious to ask.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 15, 2020, 02:58:42 PM
What's the significance of the "Breakfast Club" part of that?

Honestly, I always chalked it up to Capitano doing something weird.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actual_retail_tice on June 15, 2020, 04:17:58 PM
I always thought the "Breakfast Club" was a reference to the 80s movie of the same name about four kids in weekend detention. I assume Capitano was envisioning the remaining contestants from the opening calldown being sent off to serve punishment for bad bidding.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 15, 2020, 04:23:45 PM
I always thought the "Breakfast Club" is a reference to the 80s movie of the same name about four kids in weekend detention. I assume Capitano was envisioning the remaining contestants from the opening calldown being sent off to serve punishment for bad bidding.

That crossed my mind too thinking about this. It certainly makes sense.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 15, 2020, 04:30:20 PM
Here's an interesting question, and apologies if it was discussed before, as I feel it maybe it mighta been. Was there ever a thought to keeping the original Season 31 logo and set (which was only used on the premiere, and was a de-facto replacement for the Season 30 one), vs. going to the completely redone one they used from that Season up through Season 34 (albeit if using two different turntable designs in that span of time)? Or was that always the plan to redo everything?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 15, 2020, 06:11:18 PM
That's an interesting question.  The set redo was Syd's idea, not the show's, so I guess the real question is whether they would have kept the anniversary logo, gone back to something like the 25-29 design, or just gone back to the plain doors.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 15, 2020, 07:21:02 PM
That's an interesting question.  The set redo was Syd's idea, not the show's, so I guess the real question is whether they would have kept the anniversary logo, gone back to something like the 25-29 design, or just gone back to the plain doors.

If I had to guess.....given they went to the length they did of having the modified Season 30 logo on the doors for the Premiere, I'd guess they woulda kept that logo. But that could be wrong. I presume the ill-fated Hollywood Turntable was Syd's idea too then? Wonder if he woulda fought the idea of a return to the classic look (albeit with pink and blue colors vs. orange and purple).

Also while we are on this....what woulda been the rationale in keeping the 25th anniversary logo through 29 vs. replacing it after a year? Just made more sense to keep them vs. revert back? It's interesting too, they had done the same thing in 26 they did at start of 31, in terms of replacing the year on them.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 20, 2020, 02:45:45 PM
Before Bob/the show began taping 175 episode seasons in his later years, in the era of summer reruns (aka Season 4 onward), what woulda been the longest season they did? And conversely what woulda been the shortest?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on June 20, 2020, 03:01:57 PM
Before Bob/the show began taping 175 episode seasons in his later years, in the era of summer reruns (aka Season 4 onward), what woulda been the longest season they did? And conversely what woulda been the shortest?
And to piggyback onto that, when did "175 a year" become the standard?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 20, 2020, 08:09:56 PM
Before Bob/the show began taping 175 episode seasons in his later years, in the era of summer reruns (aka Season 4 onward), what woulda been the longest season they did? And conversely what woulda been the shortest?

Season 6 had 228 episodes, one fewer than Season 2, the shortest half-hour season.

The first season to end at 175 episodes instead of on some seemingly predetermined Friday was 27; it's also the first year they took weeks off in March and April, which I'm guessing isn't a coincidence.  Oddly, neither 28 nor 29 would have that many shows, which is a tale in its own right.  As far as I've been able to make out, 28 was cut to 155 shows because Bob's surgery in 1999 caused several weeks of taping to be cancelled (they did, in fact, have four extra weeks of reruns that winter), but then, for reasons I've never really understood, the first two weeks of shows produced as part of Season 29 were redesignated as the last two weeks of 28, bringing the count to 165.  That would have also cut 29 down to 165, but one of the episodes had to be scrapped and redone because of a production error that nobody caught, which also came out of 29's episode count even though it was considered part of 28.  So Season 28 has 165 shows, and Season 29 has 164.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 20, 2020, 08:55:32 PM
Season 6 had 228 episodes, one fewer than Season 2, the shortest half-hour season.

The first season to end at 175 episodes instead of on some seemingly predetermined Friday was 27; it's also the first year they took weeks off in March and April, which I'm guessing isn't a coincidence.  Oddly, neither 28 nor 29 would have that many shows, which is a tale in its own right.  As far as I've been able to make out, 28 was cut to 155 shows because Bob's surgery in 1999 caused several weeks of taping to be cancelled (they did, in fact, have four extra weeks of reruns that winter), but then, for reasons I've never really understood, the first two weeks of shows produced as part of Season 29 were redesignated as the last two weeks of 28, bringing the count to 165.  That would have also cut 29 down to 165, but one of the episodes had to be scrapped and redone because of a production error that nobody caught, which also came out of 29's episode count even though it was considered part of 28.  So Season 28 has 165 shows, and Season 29 has 164.

My guess on that is that they wanted to even out the counts for those 2 seasons. That's likely the reason I suspect, or just to make up for some of the shows lost due to Bob's surgery. Either way it woulda had the same effect.

And interesting, they were doing 200+ shows a year still even after summer reruns started? I wouldn't have thought that. When would that have stopped? Also, in regards to shortest seasons pre 175, I was referring to post-rerun era onward, I imagine it'd be somewhere in at least the mid to late 90's, aka just before that became a thing, if not earlier. Could imagine many might would tie for least actually in fact. It woulda eventually become 195 as a standard much as it is now, wouldn't it?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 21, 2020, 03:56:10 AM
Also, in regards to shortest seasons pre 175, I was referring to post-rerun era onward

Sorry -- I completely missed that question earlier.  Seasons 18 and 21 both lasted 177 episodes.

It woulda eventually become 195 as a standard much as it is now, wouldn't it?

The current standard is actually 190.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 28, 2020, 12:05:11 AM
Does anyone have a date where the show introduced the higher pitched theme, from its' lower counterpart, or a general timeframe? I am thinking it was somewhere before Season 12, but hard to say with clarity even watching back a few openings from near the end of Season 11.

Also....on # of shows per year.....when would 190 a year have become the general standard, pre-175? I'd assume it woulda been somewhere early into the reruns era, but....that could be wrong.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 28, 2020, 03:07:52 AM
when would 190 a year have become the general standard, pre-175?

Never.  Before Season 27, they just seemed to do as many shows as possible up to a seemingly random Friday in June.  In fact, there are no Barker seasons that have exactly 190 episodes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 28, 2020, 01:16:35 PM
Never.  Before Season 27, they just seemed to do as many shows as possible up to a seemingly random Friday in June.  In fact, there are no Barker seasons that have exactly 190 episodes.

Interesting..did many top 200 or get near it up to then? I know you said Season 6 had 228.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 28, 2020, 06:33:58 PM
I might as well just post the whole list:

Season 1:    254 – 254
Season 2:    229 – 483
Season 3:    253 – 736
Season 4:    214 – 950
Season 5:    213 – 1,163
Season 6:    228 – 1,391
Season 7:    209 – 1,600
Season 8:    191 – 1,791
Season 9:    205 – 1,996
Season 10:  196 – 2,192
Season 11:  208 – 2,400
Season 12:  197 – 2,597
Season 13:  195 – 2,792
Season 14:  186 – 2,978
Season 15:  191 – 3,169
Season 16:  186 – 3,355
Season 17:  184 – 3,539
Season 18:  177 – 3,716
Season 19:  186 – 3,902
Season 20:  178 – 4,080
Season 21:  177 – 4,257
Season 22:  185 – 4,442
Season 23:  183 – 4,625
Season 24:  183 – 4,808
Season 25:  185 – 4,993
Season 26:  184 – 5,177
Season 27:  175 – 5,352
Season 28:  165 – 5,517
Season 29:  164 – 5,681
Season 30:  175 – 5,856
Season 31:  175 – 6,031
Season 32:  175 – 6,206
Season 33:  175 – 6,381
Season 34:  175 – 6,556
Season 35:  175 – 6,731
Season 36:  190 – 6,921
Season 37:  191 – 7,112
Season 38:  190 – 7,302
Season 39:  190 – 7,492
Season 40:  191 – 7,683
Season 41:  189 – 7,872
Season 42:  190 – 8,062
Season 43:  190 – 8,252
Season 44:  190 – 8,442
Season 45:  190 – 8,632
Season 46:  190 – 8,822
Season 47:  190 – 9,012
Season 48:  164 – 9,176
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on June 30, 2020, 04:04:29 AM
I guess it's around the first quarter of 2012, but when did the show changed their trip displays from the various font styles to the current standard trip display like this?

(https://i.postimg.cc/tRdMKSw9/Screenshot-20200630-153614.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on June 30, 2020, 04:58:58 AM
I guess it's around the first quarter of 2012, but when did the show changed their trip displays from the various font styles to the current standard trip display like this?

(https://i.postimg.cc/tRdMKSw9/Screenshot-20200630-153614.jpg)

Are you meaning the screens in general, or just the fonts?

I think it was even before that if the former......they had in Season 38 or Drew's second season, green screens for Trips, and either that season eventually or the one after when they brought the new set in that had many more electronic elements to it than the ones before it, they brought those in. It wasn't long after the green screens that I know.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on June 30, 2020, 08:14:36 AM
Just the fonts on the displays.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on July 14, 2020, 05:16:03 PM
Hopefully these two qualify as easy questions:

1) When did they start using the "vamp" of the Family Feud theme for car reveals? I'm guessing it started around '77 or '78 and went on it to the early 80s, maybe '83? (Honestly, it's my favorite car theme next to Big Banana.)

2) When did they start showing live shots and shots of previous episodes on the TVs that were prizes? I know that the early projection TVs used a green screen effect to show the contestant's face. Do they even show those shots anymore? I don't watch modern-day Price, and I've only seen them use some variation of the show's logo or the $.

Thanks, everyone!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on July 15, 2020, 02:56:58 PM
When did they stop doing the "and to the winner of this goes a supply of" plug?? And why did they stop? I seem to recall them still doing this into 2009 right?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on July 15, 2020, 03:20:57 PM
...They still kind of do it, in a limited form? 9 times out of 10 it's just an Eggland's Best award, with the most recent one being 3/27/2020 (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,31104.0.html). They've also done an Ancestry DNA kit and Farkle board game in the past few season.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on July 25, 2020, 10:29:10 AM
Has there been any known playing of Punch-A-Bunch lost by getting no SP right?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on July 25, 2020, 11:22:44 AM
Not to my knowledge. Tpirstats.com (http://tpirstats.com/Other/PGStats3.html#pab) says there were no occurrences of that from S29-47, and I don't recall any in S48. If there was one prior to S29 though, I wouldn't know.

My guess as to why that is, is because Punchy is set up to guarantee one punch, i.e. there's always a gimme SP, one so easy it would be hard not to blow it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 26, 2020, 12:09:47 AM
Not to my knowledge. Tpirstats.com (http://tpirstats.com/Other/PGStats3.html#pab) says there were no occurrences of that from S29-47, and I don't recall any in S48. If there was one prior to S29 though, I wouldn't know.

My guess as to why that is, is because Punchy is set up to guarantee one punch, i.e. there's always a gimme SP, one so easy it would be hard not to blow it.

Has there ever been a near wipeout I wonder? Ie: One where the first 3 prizes get missed, and they have to get the last one to get even one punch? Or is the game generally setup to avoid even that possibility?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on July 26, 2020, 12:37:28 AM
Has there been any known playing of Punch-A-Bunch lost by getting no SP right?

According to Roger's notepads, it's happened exactly once, all the way back in season seven.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on July 26, 2020, 12:38:42 AM
Thanks for the info Scott!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 26, 2020, 12:42:21 AM
According to Roger's notepads, it's happened exactly once, all the way back in season seven.

Oh wow. I have to imagine that was on a very early playing since it debuted that season......and before they really established a system to best avoid that happening (perhaps that playing was even the impetus for it).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on July 28, 2020, 05:16:49 AM
In Magic #, would it be considered a win if the cpntestant set the number at the exact price of one of the two prizes?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on July 28, 2020, 07:55:36 AM
Yes, it's considered a win. Would be pretty difficult to say otherwise with that skill (or luck)!

"Well you guessed the price of one of the prizes exactly, which is the whole point of the show, but you were supposed to get between the two prices, so too bad for you."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on August 22, 2020, 07:15:33 PM
When did Pass the Buck switch from Velcro strips to the thin slots we have now?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 22, 2020, 08:00:06 PM
When did Pass the Buck switch from Velcro strips to the thin slots we have now?

It was in the fall of Season 37.  On one of the first playings that year (I can't remember which, since shows were both airing and taping out of order), one of the numbers got knocked loose by the Race Game Curtain while the game was being revealed, so they redid the board to have them resting on shelves.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on August 23, 2020, 12:28:56 AM
It was in the fall of Season 37.  On one of the first playings that year (I can't remember which, since shows were both airing and taping out of order), one of the numbers got knocked loose by the Race Game Curtain while the game was being revealed, so they redid the board to have them resting on shelves.
Did the show stop tape when that happened and reset the board and reshot the reveal or did the playing continue with an amount revealed?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 23, 2020, 12:50:01 AM
Did the show stop tape when that happened and reset the board and reshot the reveal or did the playing continue with an amount revealed?

In typical Season 37 fashion, it was handled really stupidly.  Drew just declared that the contestant already "had" the cash amount that got revealed as though it had been a pick and then proceeded with the game like nothing had happened.  She ended up losing it to a Lose Everything.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on August 23, 2020, 01:44:42 AM
In typical Season 37 fashion, it was handled really stupidly.  Drew just declared that the contestant already "had" the cash amount that got revealed as though it had been a pick and then proceeded with the game like nothing had happened.  She ended up losing it to a Lose Everything.

He also, more unfairly, never gave her the option to take that money before making a second pick and losing it in turn when she did. Declaring they had it/making it an automatic pick isn't bad necessarily, and could see Bob doing the same thing actually in that situation. But what I couldn't ever imagine him doing, is letting the game proceed normally without allowing the contestant the chance to take that money before playing on. That was the worst part of this to me.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on August 23, 2020, 08:37:44 AM
I would've just awarded the $5k for her to keep regardless of if a Lose Everything was picked.

Say the number that got knocked loose was the car. What do you suppose would've happened in that case? I couldn't see them giving her the car outright and scrapping the rest of the game, but maybe there's an S&P problem otherwise, and even if there wasn't, being S37, who knows.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on August 23, 2020, 01:20:19 PM
He also, more unfairly, never gave her the option to take that money before making a second pick and losing it in turn when she did. Declaring they had it/making it an automatic pick isn't bad necessarily, and could see Bob doing the same thing actually in that situation. But what I couldn't ever imagine him doing, is letting the game proceed normally without allowing the contestant the chance to take that money before playing on. That was the worst part of this to me.

What else could they have done?

They could stop tape, get somebody from S&P backstage ASAP, and reshuffle the numbers. Gameplay-wise, that’s probably the best decision, but that has its own tradeoffs, and I don’t think they would consider it unless it was the car that got revealed.

They could just play the game normally and let the contestant decide whether to pick the cash amount or not, but that leaves you with the potentially awkward scenario where the contestant decides to take the already revealed “sure thing” on their last pick instead of trying to find the car.

IMO giving her the option to bail with the cash amount before making an actual “pick” would be even less fair—every other contestant has to use one of their picks before they’re eligible to win something. Allowing her to quit right off the bat would essentially give her four picks instead of three.

(IIRC she won three picks, and won the car on her last pick)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 23, 2020, 01:55:19 PM
They could just play the game normally and let the contestant decide whether to pick the cash amount or not, but that leaves you with the potentially awkward scenario where the contestant decides to take the already revealed “sure thing” on their last pick instead of trying to find the car.

A good host finds a way to make this work.

"Now, we know where the $5,000 is, but the car's still up there, too...and so are $1,000 and another Lose Everything.  You can try for the car, or you can take that one you already know is safe."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on August 23, 2020, 04:58:53 PM
A good host finds a way to make this work.

"Now, we know where the $5,000 is, but the car's still up there, too...and so are $1,000 and another Lose Everything.  You can try for the car, or you can take that one you already know is safe."

I can still see Bob giving them an extra turn too if it was kept as was (just allowing the bailout option) so as not to punish them for a mistake they made. Like what if they coulda got the car on the 3rd pick as they had here? Remember, you gotta favor the contestant in situations like this, something they didn't do here exactly.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on August 23, 2020, 05:18:49 PM
Looked it up, to make sure.

http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,9160.0.html

They had $3,000 potentially added to their first pick, they got to use all three picks, and they only had to choose from five unrevealed numbers instead of six. That doesn’t punish the contestant in the slightest, it benefits them.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on August 23, 2020, 06:20:49 PM
Looked it up, to make sure.

http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,9160.0.html

They had $3,000 potentially added to their first pick, they got to use all three picks, and they only had to choose from five unrevealed numbers instead of six. That doesn’t punish the contestant in the slightest, it benefits them.

Except, the chances of lose everythings increased, including risking that $3,000 (which they did indeed lose). That shoudn't have happened.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on August 23, 2020, 06:50:35 PM
The expected value increased, and that's what truly benefits the contestant, not the chances of picking a Lose Everything with one non-car slot removed.

I'm in the camp that they should have just reshuffled the board, but this was 12 years ago? And they still won the car?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpir04 on August 23, 2020, 07:55:34 PM
I find it hilarious that Bonkers, played right before,  also had an issue with the reveal. No wonder some people at the time were saying Drew and co. drove Price into the ground.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on August 23, 2020, 08:34:03 PM
They should've covered the spot back up and let the contestant decide if they wanted to pick it or not. This gives the most advantage to the contestant; they now have only 5 spots to try to find the car instead of 6, and if they win the car on the first or second pick, they can then pick #3 to get $3,000 in addition to the car. And if the contestant just wants the $3,000, they could just pick #3 and walk away.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on August 24, 2020, 10:15:16 PM
Has there been any playing with a line on Double Cross having two of the same number next to each other?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on August 25, 2020, 12:34:51 AM
Yes. The Season 44's 2010s Decade show had a trip to Alaska worth $4,966.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on August 27, 2020, 02:05:24 AM
Why were the blue and green spaces in contestants’ row swapped? Also, why did the orange space change to yellow?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on August 27, 2020, 05:10:31 PM
Not sure about the blue and green swap, but as for orange becoming yellow the curtain behind the audience changed from orange to yellow sometime before the change (I forget if it was during season 30 or 31) so they finally changed the podium color to match later on.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on August 27, 2020, 07:11:54 PM
Not sure about the blue and green swap, but as for orange becoming yellow the curtain behind the audience changed from orange to yellow sometime before the change (I forget if it was during season 30 or 31) so they finally changed the podium color to match later on.


IIRC, the change from orange to yellow was in place in Season 31.  Not sure if the episode where it became permanent was taped in 2002 or 2003, but it definitely happened before the Turntable update (and removal of the Daytime Hollywood mural).

I'm guessing the reason behind the blue & green swap is also related to the curtains behind the audience.  I think when it was changed in the early 1980s it started as red-blue-orange-green from left to right, while the podiums, which predated the 80s curtains, were still red-green-orange-blue throughout Season 9
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on August 28, 2020, 01:34:43 AM
Why was the order of the colors in the curtains changed?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on August 28, 2020, 07:52:31 AM
Why was the order of the colors in the curtains changed?

I'm not sure if you mean the change from the '70s to the '80s curtains, but I believe you're referring to the reversals that happened in 1986 (after the primetime Specials were taped) and lasted until 1991, picking up a third green curtain along the way in 1988. Supposedly it was done after some extra lighting was installed behind them to give them a "glitter" effect, and the stagehands forgot to install them back in the correct order.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: EaglesWings4500 on September 30, 2020, 10:43:07 PM
I just came across this..  Sorry if this has been answered,,


At least Make Your Mark, Clearance Sale, and Step Up all fit this criteria, and I strongly suspect Credit Card does as well. Barker's Bargain Bar and Check Game were essentially retired for years (particularly the former), and 3 Strikes teetered rather close to it given what happened in Season 37.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What happened with three strikes in Season 37??   
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on September 30, 2020, 10:59:48 PM
It was decided after the first playing of season 37 that the format of 3 Strikes with 5 chips and just 1 strike wasn't working anymore so they kept tinkering with it and finally stopped playing it. They started playing the game for normal cars rather than luxury ones and giving the first digit for free but added two strike chips which made the game more difficult. They made it one strike chip again for one playing, then removed it from the rotation for the remainder of the season.   
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: EaglesWings4500 on September 30, 2020, 11:50:04 PM
I came across another video and  I did not know that PIR had a rainbow wheel..  When did they get rid of it and why did they get rid of it??  Would you like to see it come back

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on October 01, 2020, 12:19:57 AM
Looks like they got rid of it by November of 1975.  Not sure why they moved on from it; probably one of many things (from rules to props to whatever) that get updated to something more indefinite, if not permanent.

While I thought the very short-lived Rainbow Wheel era was neat, however, I think I definitely do not want to see it return.  I can't speak for anyone, but the Big Wheel works for me
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on October 01, 2020, 12:23:28 AM
The Rainbow Wheel was only used for the trial hour shows in September 1975. When the show made its permanent switch to the hour format is when the Big Wheel debuted... and of course, all this is right there in the Timeline  :roll:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on October 11, 2020, 11:43:21 PM
What date was the last time where they used the old trip skins? I was watching an episode from May 2009 today and noticed they were gone already.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on October 12, 2020, 11:23:40 AM
What date was the last time where they used the old trip skins? I was watching an episode from May 2009 today and noticed they were gone already.

According to the timeline (http://www.golden-road.net/gr_faq/index.php?title=The_Price_Is_Right_Timeline), the trip skins were permanently replaced by green screen on the first full week of November 2008. There were some out-of-order airings but it appears that Halloween 2008 would have had the last old trip skins.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on October 12, 2020, 11:33:35 AM
If the timing is correct, then the last aired trip skin used would have been this ceiling-dropped Mount Rushmore skin as the first Item Up For Bids on Halloween 2008.

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/560639249511219210/765235404902760488/Price_Rushmore.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: BillyGr on October 13, 2020, 02:39:04 PM
Didn't one of the Decades episodes (that they just re-aired recently) use an actual sign for a trip that was dropped from the ceiling?

Would that be the same (even though an unusual setting), as they either found one or recreated it for that particular show, and those shows were after 2008?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on October 13, 2020, 03:42:15 PM
Oh, good call, the timeline didn't mention that but you're absolutely right! Here is the 1970s Day trip skin for a trip offered in Double Prices, on September 21, 2015:

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/560639249511219210/765660214245851176/Price_Portugal.jpg)

And a 1980s Day showcase trip skin for Maui the next day:

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/560639249511219210/765661606679150642/unknown.png)

So now you've got two answers: the last regular trip skin, and the last trip skin used for a special occasion!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on October 14, 2020, 03:33:05 AM
Oh, good call, the timeline didn't mention that

For reasons that I don't even remember anymore, I've never gotten around to doing timeline updates for most of what happened in Decades Week (or the next three weeks, for that matter).  I really should do that -- it was an incredibly fun set of shows.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on October 14, 2020, 09:38:40 AM
For reasons that I don't even remember anymore, I've never gotten around to doing timeline updates for most of what happened in Decades Week (or the next three weeks, for that matter).  I really should do that -- it was an incredibly fun set of shows.

No worries; most of the timeline is so detailed and comprehensive that I assumed without further checking that any trip skins would've been mentioned. I didn't intend pointing the omission as a knock on your work!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Nick on October 25, 2020, 04:34:48 PM
Here's one I've been wondering lately: When car plugs were truncated around 34 in the time crunch, what was actually included in "standard equipment"?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on October 26, 2020, 01:39:26 AM
Here's one I've been wondering lately: When car plugs were truncated around 34 in the time crunch, what was actually included in "standard equipment"?

Whatever you'd get with the car if you purchased the least expensive build that came with no options. Naturally, it varied from model to model -- for example, if a given model of car only came with automatic transmission, then that was part of "standard equipment." But if the car could be purchased with either manual or automatic transmission, then manual would be the "standard."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: allnewtpir94 on December 03, 2020, 12:24:14 AM
I read something, and I want verification from those who would know. If there's a tie in the Showcase, does each player win their own showcase, and a tie within $250 gives the both of them everything?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on December 03, 2020, 12:33:14 AM
I read something, and I want verification from those who would know. If there's a tie in the Showcase, does each player win their own showcase, and a tie within $250 gives the both of them everything?

Absolutely, yes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: allnewtpir94 on December 03, 2020, 03:12:28 AM
Absolutely, yes.

Okay that sounds awesome.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FPGWillyT on December 03, 2020, 09:24:36 AM
Absolutely, yes.

Straight from the old CBS FAQ section.  Might still be there for all I know.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: urbanpreppie0004 on December 03, 2020, 10:10:38 AM
What happens if both showcase bids are under $250 and are off by the same amount? They each win both showcases, and is referred to as a "Double Double Showcase Showcase Win Win."

I'll see myself out.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: allnewtpir94 on December 03, 2020, 07:13:23 PM
What happens if both showcase bids are under $250 and are off by the same amount? They each win both showcases, and is referred to as a "Double Double Showcase Showcase Win Win."

I'll see myself out.

In-N-Out gives them a year of Double-Doubles.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: BillyGr on December 03, 2020, 10:17:17 PM
What happens if both showcase bids are under $250 and are off by the same amount? They each win both showcases, and is referred to as a "Double Double Showcase Showcase Win Win."

I'll see myself out.

And the extra prizes will be sponsored by Wawa and Little Ceasers (you know, Pizza! Pizza!) ;)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 04, 2020, 02:52:02 PM
Seeing Bullseye 76 played a few different times now since the 24/7 channel launch, I started to wonder.....how was/is the Hidden Bullseye placement determined? Just a random pick? Or was/is it something more calculated?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on December 04, 2020, 03:49:18 PM
Probably something more calculated.

For most games, if something “random” is not obviously randomly generated onstage (Plinko chips dropping, 3 Strikes draws, etc), it’s probably not random and placed with a purpose. Placement of Punch a Bunch prize slips, Spelling Bee & Pass the Buck cards, etc. are all intentional.

If I had to guess, I would assume they want to put it behind one of the least expensive products when they want a win (since they're more obvious and more likely to be picked), and behind an ambiguous or "more expensive than it looks" product if they want a loss (since it's less likely to be picked and more likely to be overpriced).

But this is just gut feeling after watching a few episodes from the 80's, I'm definitely no expert on this era.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 05, 2020, 05:10:40 AM
This not a question, but something I wanted to add here for reference looking for it, as I thought it possibly occurred in Season 11 and would come up sooner than later on the 24/7 channel. Using all available YouTube episodes from Season 11 through to the 8/25 episode or the next to last show of the year, and then viewing back the opening to the Season 12 premiere as well the following week, it stands to reason that said premiere was the debut of the higher pitched version of the classic theme that would come to mark the rest of the show's run under Barker's watch. So if anyone was curious about that or wanted to make a note of it in the FAQ for posterity, there you go. :-) I thought maybe it got changed mid-season somewhere and pinpointing the transition woulda been tougher, but..makes more sense it woulda changed right at start of Season 12 instead.

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: NickintheATL on December 07, 2020, 09:30:02 PM
This not a question, but something I wanted to add here for reference looking for it, as I thought it possibly occurred in Season 11 and would come up sooner than later on the 24/7 channel. Using all available YouTube episodes from Season 11 through to the 8/25 episode or the next to last show of the year, and then viewing back the opening to the Season 12 premiere as well the following week, it stands to reason that said premiere was the debut of the higher pitched version of the classic theme that would come to mark the rest of the show's run under Barker's watch. So if anyone was curious about that or wanted to make a note of it in the FAQ for posterity, there you go. :-) I thought maybe it got changed mid-season somewhere and pinpointing the transition woulda been tougher, but..makes more sense it woulda changed right at start of Season 12 instead.

There is no difference to note here. It's the same theme, maybe it was retransferred onto a new tape cartridge. The edit in the theme did change slightly for a few years in the mid-to-late 80s, but that's not enough of a change to note.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on December 07, 2020, 11:16:33 PM
There is no difference to note here. It's the same theme, maybe it was retransferred onto a new tape cartridge. The edit in the theme did change slightly for a few years in the mid-to-late 80s, but that's not enough of a change to note.
Speaking of this just got me thinking... I'd heard that supposedly there was a re-record of the main theme (unused on the show) from the 1990s, that was identical to the 1972 original, except for being in stereo (AFAIK all the "classic" music packages were recorded in mono). Is this correct? And if so, is this re-recording anywhere online?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: NickintheATL on December 08, 2020, 01:07:22 AM
Speaking of this just got me thinking... I'd heard that supposedly there was a re-record of the main theme (unused on the show) from the 1990s, that was identical to the 1972 original, except for being in stereo (AFAIK all the "classic" music packages were recorded in mono). Is this correct? And if so, is this re-recording anywhere online?
No. And no.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 12, 2020, 04:32:53 AM
No. And no.

I wonder if he was thinking of the unused sped up version of the theme recorded in 1983, why was that decided to be not used anyway at the time?

Also on a different subject, seeing Now and Then (or Now or Then now), pop up on the penultimate Christmas show just a little while ago, got me wondering....how were/are the Then years determined? Was/is any particular method or reasoning used?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on December 12, 2020, 11:42:49 AM
That is a good question-- I can only think of a couple of times when they used a Then date for a specific reason: the Survivor primetime episode in 2016 where the Then date was when Survivor debuted and for Decades week when the Then date (and the two Then products I believe) were when the game debuted. Otherwise they're seemingly random. A follow up question: Has a Then date ever been repeated, or is it different every playing?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on December 12, 2020, 04:47:05 PM
Back around the end of Barker's run and season 36 (http://tpirstats.com/Season36/PGStats2.html), the show kept cycling through the same three "then" dates. Then a TPIR employee came in and revamped the system used, creating a wider variety of dates. But it's expected that the dates will still sometimes repeat.

With rare exception (such as the examples mentioned above), the "then" date is simply chosen based on what would work well in that particular playing. The only times I remember a "then" date being chosen for a specific gameplay reason while I was there were when the game was played during Christmas week. Obviously, the "then" date needed to be from December -- it would make for a pretty easy game to determine whether any Christmas-themed groceries were from, say, June.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 12, 2020, 04:55:38 PM
Back around the end of Barker's run and season 36 (http://tpirstats.com/Season36/PGStats2.html), the show kept cycling through the same three "then" dates. Then a TPIR employee came in and revamped the system used, creating a wider variety of dates. But it's expected that the dates will still sometimes repeat.

With rare exception (such as the examples mentioned above), the "then" date is simply chosen based on what would work well in that particular playing. The only times I remember a "then" date being chosen for a specific gameplay reason while I was there were when the game was played during Christmas week. Obviously, the "then" date needed to be from December -- it would make for a pretty easy game to determine whether any Christmas-themed groceries were from, say, June.

This is kinda funny, considering I think the products in the game I saw last night, which was again from Christmas week, were from June of 1977. Interesting how practices woulda changed decades later.

And as to dates that worked well for the particular playing, I'd assume that to mean based on what products were used for the game (ie: making sure each product actually existed in the Then period)? That would make sense.

And while we're on that subject....with regards to the products, how difficult a task was it to scope out Then prices in the past? I imagine nowadays with the internet and all the job is much easier, but can see it being a challenge way back when. Would they have had some sort of master list based on what they used at the time to refer from? Or was there another way they'd have gone about it?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on December 12, 2020, 05:37:59 PM
Would they have had some sort of master list based on what they used at the time to refer from? Or was there another way they'd have gone about it?

From the FAQ - and I'm guessing this is what Scott is talking about as far as revamping the system:

"Many “then” prices these days are taken from old episodes of Price, but until the late '00s, Fingers found most of them by looking through old newspaper ads."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 12, 2020, 05:42:10 PM
From the FAQ - and I'm guessing this is what Scott is talking about as far as revamping the system:

"Many “then” prices these days are taken from old episodes of Price, but until the late '00s, Fingers found most of them by looking through old newspaper ads."

Ah that would make sense, thank you.  :-) Kinda amazing it took that long to revamp things, since using old episodes woulda been/would be much easier and less time consuming surely.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on December 13, 2020, 08:25:56 AM
Two random things I've always wondered...

How do they prevent the Safecrackers door from opening if the contestant gets it wrong and pulls?  (On the latest playing Drew said something like "there's no latch" or something like that.)

Are you allowed to play 3 X's in a vertical line on Secret X?  I know that would give you a 0% chance of winning if you didn't win all three X's, but I was just curious!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on December 13, 2020, 08:41:59 AM
Of the top of my head, for Safe Crackers, there should be a rod that is removed if the contestant enters in the right combination, so if one gets the combination wrong, they have to fight against the rod. And no on Secret X; Bob explains it better when he spells out that a contestant can win three on the top, middle, bottom, or diagonal.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on December 13, 2020, 11:02:10 PM
After watching Christine from this past Thursday almost think about what to do with the $10,000 she found on "Punch-a-Bunch", this got me wondering, has anybody ever given up $10,000 in hopes of finding the $25,000 card in the next hole(s)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on December 14, 2020, 06:02:57 AM
Of the top of my head, for Safe Crackers, there should be a rod that is removed if the contestant enters in the right combination, so if one gets the combination wrong, they have to fight against the rod. And no on Secret X; Bob explains it better when he spells out that a contestant can win three on the top, middle, bottom, or diagonal.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on December 14, 2020, 07:17:34 AM
After watching Christine from this past Thursday almost think about what to do with the $10,000 she found on "Punch-a-Bunch", this got me wondering, has anybody ever given up $10,000 in hopes of finding the $25,000 card in the next hole(s)?
Well I only remember one instance like that, but it's within the $10K era that happened in 1996 with epic gambler Bryan returning the $5,000 slip, only to discover he'd won the $10,000.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 15, 2020, 06:15:26 AM
Here's a good little question for those who may possibly know. I got to wondering looking at the one from 1984 a moment ago, back when they did the occasional half hour episodes in Bake-Off years after going to an hour on a permanent basis and prior to that when they had a Magazine show running in the other half hour, did they tape 2 episodes using the same audience to compensate for this, similar to how The New Price is Right in 1994 would tape 3 to account for the fact that there were only 3 contestants picked per show with no IUFBs? Or were the half hour shows treated the same way as the regular hour ones despite the smaller chance of being picked if you attended it?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Disneyfreak on December 15, 2020, 07:47:51 PM
I'M Curious, does anyone know if someone who isn't eligible to be a contestant and doesn't appear on stage still receives consolation prizes? 
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on December 15, 2020, 08:07:44 PM
I'M Curious, does anyone know if someone who isn't eligible to be a contestant and doesn't appear on stage still receives consolation prizes?
Why would they? If they weren't eligible, they likely wouldn't get called down to Contestant's Row to begin with (and certainly wouldn't now, with the "no audience" setup they've got these days).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 15, 2020, 08:14:39 PM
Why would they? If they weren't eligible, they likely wouldn't get called down to Contestant's Row to begin with (and certainly wouldn't now, with the "no audience" setup they've got these days).

He's meaning if they made it to CR and were found to be ineligible. I imagine same rules would apply though to those as it has to any who did get on stage, but that's only a guess.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on December 15, 2020, 08:24:00 PM
I would be shocked if a contestant who was called to CR but later found to be ineligible received any prizes, whether an IUFB, prizes won in a game, consolation prizes (or now $300), etc. There's no reason for the show to "reward" an ineligible contestant like that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 15, 2020, 08:27:37 PM
Have there been many times where a contestant who DIDN'T get on stage to play a game got announced to be ineligible to this end? I'd bet it may have happened at least once.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on December 15, 2020, 09:03:49 PM
He's meaning if they made it to CR and were found to be ineligible.

Just for the record, the poster in question here is female.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Nick on December 15, 2020, 09:09:13 PM
Here's one I've been wondering since a recent clip I saw.  Up until Bob's final couple of seasons, whenever a trip was offered as a One Bid, the price would be revealed with Bob saying, "the actual price..." with retail deliberately omitted.  Why was retail specifically excluded here?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on December 15, 2020, 10:00:31 PM
I'M Curious, does anyone know if someone who isn't eligible to be a contestant and doesn't appear on stage still receives consolation prizes?

Why would they? If they weren't eligible, they likely wouldn't get called down to Contestant's Row to begin with (and certainly wouldn't now, with the "no audience" setup they've got these days).

Besides "have they been on the show before", I don't think they do some thorough background check on potential contestants before they get called --people do slip through the cracks thinking they're eligible (http://francispage.blogspot.com/2007/10/come-on-down.html).

I've asked pages, OCA personnel, and CBS guest services questions about eligibility in the past. It had been under six months since I had done some work for an employer that would have rendered me ineligible. The response I got was basically "shrug, I guess if you get called on down we'll find out."

No, I'm asking you now because I don't want to be called on down if I'm ineligible. I most certainly don't want to be surprised after the fact!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 15, 2020, 10:04:02 PM
Why would they? If they weren't eligible, they likely wouldn't get called down to Contestant's Row to begin with (and certainly wouldn't now, with the "no audience" setup they've got these days).


Besides "have they been on the show before", I don't think they do some thorough background check on potential contestants before they get called --people do slip through the cracks thinking they're eligible (http://francispage.blogspot.com/2007/10/come-on-down.html).

I've asked pages, OCA personnel, and CBS guest services questions about eligibility in the past. It had been under six months since I had done some work for an employer that would have rendered me ineligible. The response I got was basically "shrug, I guess if you get called on down we'll find out."

No, I'm asking you now because I don't want to be called on down if I'm ineligible. I most certainly don't want to be surprised after the fact!

Wow that's pretty unprofessional as a response. How long ago was this?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on December 15, 2020, 10:35:11 PM
Last August. I had done some freelance work for a CBS entity in January but didn't get paid until February, which put me inside the six-month window.

It wasn't word-for-word what they said, but the gist of it did include "if you have questions about edge cases or your specific situation, we can work them out after the fact if you do get called."

I'm guessing if I had kept bugging them about it I would have been able to find somebody that would have been able to say "yes you are eligible" or "no you are not eligible" to my particular situation but I didn't press things that far.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: NickintheATL on December 16, 2020, 12:42:22 AM
Here's one I've been wondering since a recent clip I saw.  Up until Bob's final couple of seasons, whenever a trip was offered as a One Bid, the price would be revealed with Bob saying, "the actual price..." with retail deliberately omitted.  Why was retail specifically excluded here?

Well because trips are not retail merchandise. He's correct to omit the word.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on December 16, 2020, 02:45:10 PM
I looked through the FAQ, but didn't find anything definitive. I know Janice, Dian, Ray Combs, a local CBS news anchor, and a pro golfer have done the inspiration putt in Hole in One besides Bob. Has any other model or guest done the inspiration putt? I feel like some others have, specifically other models.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on December 16, 2020, 04:34:12 PM
I looked through the FAQ, but didn't find anything definitive. I know Janice, Dian, Ray Combs, a local CBS news anchor, and a pro golfer have done the inspiration putt in Hole in One besides Bob. Has any other model or guest done the inspiration putt? I feel like some others have, specifically other models.

Betty White comes to mind in term of the Barker Era.  I probably have to do a search for if it happened with a certain celebrity and/or how many times in the Carey Era
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on December 16, 2020, 05:51:53 PM
I have a vivid recollection of an episode within Bob's final couple of seasons where the tip of the Big Wheel arrow was white instead of red. Does anyone else remember this and know why that was the case? It was never acknowledged, but I always assumed the red tip broke and they had to put something else there on short notice.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on December 17, 2020, 02:56:24 PM
Not sure this is a simple question per se, but watching an episode from 1978 on YouTube just now that had featured a $5 Double Showcase win (and a haul of close to $19,000 too, a big total for then speaking to what was brought up in the Pluto thread about large wins in 1982, which included a Car and $1,000 on the Wheel + both Showcases, so basically the most you could possibly win on any one show at the time, sans $100 for a Perfect Bid), Bob mentioned beforehand that there was a DSW win on the taping previous to this too. How often has it happened where there's been back to back DSW's like this? Has to be pretty rare. (the airdates for these two if anyone cares for FAQ purposes, woulda been March 27th and March 28th).

Also as an aside....apologies if this has been asked before, but back when they didn't take a break between the Showcases and the Showcase results as they didn't here, was there any rhyme or reason as to which bid Bob read first? Would he have gotten some sort of signal to start with one or the other? Or was it entirely done on the fly by Bob's call strictly?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 02, 2021, 10:15:41 PM
Has anyone in Card Game ever made an Ace a value that wasn't a multiple of 100?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Flerbert419 on January 03, 2021, 01:17:33 AM
Absolutely - the last time was this great win on June 25, 2019 (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,30218.0.html).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on January 07, 2021, 07:57:23 AM
Is there a resource where I can find ALL the wheel spin results in one place?  I'm trying to find the total number of (extremely unlucky!) people who have gone over by spinning .05 on their first spin and $1.00 on their second.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on January 07, 2021, 09:51:37 AM
It'll take quite a bit of time to sift through all of them, but Jay Lewis maintains an extensive archive of episode recaps here. That's a good starting point.

http://tpirepguide.com/
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 07, 2021, 11:13:49 AM
Is there a resource where I can find ALL the wheel spin results in one place?  I'm trying to find the total number of (extremely unlucky!) people who have gone over by spinning .05 on their first spin and $1.00 on their second.

I've seen it at least once on Pluto TV
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on January 07, 2021, 09:32:05 PM
Is there any photo of the Credit Card prop anywhere? I'm pretty sure I've never seen it fully on any playing. Wonder if it inspired the Gas Money graphics.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on January 08, 2021, 06:47:37 AM
It'll take quite a bit of time to sift through all of them, but Jay Lewis maintains an extensive archive of episode recaps here. That's a good starting point.

http://tpirepguide.com/

Thank you so much!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on January 08, 2021, 06:32:10 PM
Is there any photo of the Credit Card prop anywhere? I'm pretty sure I've never seen it fully on any playing. Wonder if it inspired the Gas Money graphics.

I thought there was a picture of the Credit Card credit card somewhere online, but darned if I can find it.

At any rate, the Gas Money cards took no design inspiration from the Credit Card card.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on January 08, 2021, 10:23:05 PM
I thought there was a picture of the Credit Card credit card somewhere online, but darned if I can find it.

I'm pretty sure I know which one you're talking about -- it's the TPIR logo in a different font with the Super Ball!! dollar sign, right?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on January 08, 2021, 11:25:09 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/0wgBQM8.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on January 09, 2021, 12:25:12 AM
Wow, this now proves the Dec. '07 expiry.  ;) Thanks tpiradam!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: newesttpirfan on January 09, 2021, 12:27:45 AM
I looked through the FAQ, but didn't find anything definitive. I know Janice, Dian, Ray Combs, a local CBS news anchor, and a pro golfer have done the inspiration putt in Hole in One besides Bob. Has any other model or guest done the inspiration putt? I feel like some others have, specifically other models.

I know I've seen an episode where kathleen did the putt. Not sure about holly though. I remember cause I don't think Kathleen was expecting it and it was probably her first time, and she seemed pleased to have that opportunity.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on January 09, 2021, 12:53:25 AM
I know I've seen an episode where kathleen did the putt. Not sure about holly though. I remember cause I don't think Kathleen was expecting it and it was probably her first time, and she seemed pleased to have that opportunity.
Can't recall when, but I think Phil Wayne did the putt at least once.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on January 09, 2021, 05:18:17 AM
Wow, this now proves the Dec. '07 expiry.

Exactly where do you think I got that information?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on January 09, 2021, 05:47:02 AM
I've just read that info on the Wikia some time before.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MrPlinko on January 09, 2021, 10:55:36 AM
Did Bob or Drew always know where the two "CAR" cards were on the board in Spelling Bee? But the other placements of letters were random?

Joe
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on January 09, 2021, 03:48:07 PM
Did Bob or Drew always know where the two "CAR" cards were on the board in Spelling Bee? But the other placements of letters were random?

Unless things have changed recently, the host has never known where the two CAR cards are located. The producers know, but it's a mystery to the host.

If I remember correctly, when Roger loaded Spelling Bee, he would place all of the single-letter cards randomly. I got to load the board for a while, and I made my own little game out of it. I would place either all of the C cards or all of the A cards in what I thought were the most likely spots -- I wanted to see if I could get a contestant to pick five of the same letter. I never succeeded.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on January 09, 2021, 04:59:20 PM
I've just read that info on the Wikia some time before.

Without even looking at that site, I'd be willing to bet that whatever you read there is copy/paste of my FAQ, given that my entire timeline is copied over there.

(As much as that pisses me off, by the way, it turned out to be surprisingly useful while the site was down.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Tpirfan1995mr on January 09, 2021, 08:40:11 PM
What happened to the original cliffhangers mountain climber
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on January 12, 2021, 12:07:28 PM
^ He fell off the mountain too many times and died.  :pint: :hammer:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on January 14, 2021, 12:39:03 AM
^ He fell off the mountain too many times and died.  :pint: :hammer:

Footage of the fatal climb attempt exists...

https://youtu.be/BwURD8IHuwk (https://youtu.be/BwURD8IHuwk)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on January 14, 2021, 07:54:12 PM
Here is a question that I have. My apologies if this has been asked already.

At a TPIR taping (pre-covid), when the contestant coordinators have chosen their nine contestants for the taping (assuming they don't change their minds at the last minute), is there a specific way as to how they determine the order in which the group of nine will be called (first four called, fifth called, sixth called, etc.)?

- actpir 
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 14, 2021, 07:58:46 PM
Here is a question that I have. My apologies if this has been asked already.

At a TPIR taping (pre-covid), when the contestant coordinators have chosen their nine contestants for the taping (assuming they don't change their minds at the last minute), is there a specific way as to how they determine the order in which the group of nine will be called (first four called, fifth called, sixth called, etc.)?

- actpir

I could be wrong, but I feel I've heard somewhere before the first four at least are determined pretty quickly after interviews (remember they were put on cue cards due to the noise in studio at the open, it was quieter for other 5), while the others are treated a little more randomly, but this is just me talking I might be wrong on this.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on January 14, 2021, 09:52:36 PM
I believe Roger once said the contestants that were thought to be the most likely to interact well with Bon were placed 5th - this way, Bob could interact with them after their come on down.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 15, 2021, 02:48:51 AM
I believe Roger once said the contestants that were thought to be the most likely to interact well with Bon were placed 5th - this way, Bob could interact with them after their come on down.

Whose Bon?  :lol:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on January 15, 2021, 03:09:18 AM
Maybe it's just a typo of "Bob"...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 15, 2021, 03:31:26 AM
Maybe it's just a typo of "Bob"...

I know lol, just felt like being a wise guy is all.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: 123123123 on January 16, 2021, 09:39:18 PM
Has anyone ever won the maximum amount they could based on the number of Plinko chips they won?

Basically, has anyone ever bombed the pricing and hit the center slot with the freebie or earned 1 chip and hit the center twice?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on January 16, 2021, 10:00:56 PM
Closest I can think of off the top of my head was from 1993: $6,000 was won with two Plinko chips but I'd have to actually dig through almost 40yrs of recaps to find something closer.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on January 16, 2021, 10:43:07 PM
A quick search for all the playings of Plinko with only one chip won reveals the last time someone won only one chip, it hit the center (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,22424.0.html).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 19, 2021, 01:08:56 PM
What counts as a win for Super Ball? Did they have to win all three prizes or was just the prize for Ball 3 enough to count it as a win, since it was the highest value and sometimes a car?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actual_retail_tice on January 19, 2021, 02:03:55 PM
I don’t know that prize 3 necessarily was always the highest valued prize. It definitely was if it was a car. But especially for the first few years, I’d say the three prizes were roughly equal. It should only count as a win of all three prizes were won.
(In later years, prizes 1 and sometimes 2 were downgraded to around IUFB-level or Switch-level prizes.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on January 19, 2021, 02:35:32 PM
Going by the official definition of wins the show uses, I would think that all three prizes needed to be won to be considered a win.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on January 19, 2021, 03:40:07 PM
What counts as a win for Super Ball? Did they have to win all three prizes or was just the prize for Ball 3 enough to count it as a win, since it was the highest value and sometimes a car?

According to the FAQ's General Questions section:

Quote
The show’s official defintion of “winning” is as follows: a car game is won if the car is won; a cash game is won if the big prize announced at the beginning of the game is won (this means that Plinko has never been won); any other game is won if all of the main prizes being played for are won.

However, there are many cases in which you can not win a game but not really lose it, either; for instance, winning $8,000 in It’s in the Bag, winning only one or two prizes in Race Game, or winning the 3-digit prize in Any Number. The show recognizes these as “partial wins;” just as Bob or Drew will not declare a perfect show if there are five wins and $41,000 given away in Plinko, they will not declare them skunked if there are five losses and $100 given away in Plinko. Also, because it seems so goofy to say that Plinko has never been won, a lot of people consider it a “win” if the center slot is hit at least once. For an episode to truly be “winless,” nothing can be won in any of the pricing games beyond small prizes (a la Cliff Hangers or Switcheroo), insignificant amounts of cash in certain games, and the first prize in Ten Chances. The next entry in this section gives a more detailed description of partial wins.

In addition to this, Super Ball!! and Walk of Fame sometimes blurred the above distinctions between types of games; they weren’t car games, but in each game, the final prize was a car sometimes. Under these circumstances, the games’ normal requirements prevailed, meaning that it was possible to win a car in your pricing game and still technically not win the game.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 19, 2021, 10:52:08 PM
According to the FAQ's General Questions section:

$100 in Plinko isn't seen as an insignificant amount of cash as to the definition of a winless show? I see that as quite interesting. I'd have guessed the line woulda been like $500 or maybe even $1,000, but not $100 since that's besides 0 it's the bare minimum you could win in a playing.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on January 20, 2021, 01:13:25 AM
$100 in Plinko isn't seen as an insignificant amount of cash as to the definition of a winless show? I see that as quite interesting. I'd have guessed the line woulda been like $500 or maybe even $1,000, but not $100 since that's besides 0 it's the bare minimum you could win in a playing.

It varies from game to game, really.  Every game has some circumstance that counts as a full loss, even if it doesn't actually mean the contestant didn't win anything.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on January 20, 2021, 01:41:30 AM
$100 in Plinko isn't seen as an insignificant amount of cash as to the definition of a winless show? I see that as quite interesting. I'd have guessed the line woulda been like $500 or maybe even $1,000, but not $100 since that's besides 0 it's the bare minimum you could win in a playing.

Gotta draw the line somewhere.

The official definitions of "win" and "loss" in edge cases are limited to exactly those--"official" definitions. I doubt they're used for anything besides internal record keeping. The guy who wins $1,000 playing Plinko doesn't care whether the show marks him down as a "partial win" or a "loss", he cares that he got to play Plinko and won $1,000.

Speaking of which:

Quote from: FAQ
The show’s official defintion of “winning” is as follows: a car game is won if the car is won; a cash game is won if the big prize announced at the beginning of the game is won (this means that Plinko has never been won); any other game is won if all of the main prizes being played for are won.

Do we even know for sure if the show is still using this as their rule for their official records? This may have been true when Roger/Scott were in charge of the records, but it's totally possible over the last decade the show's official records have switched to tracking (or not tracking) "partial wins" using a completely different metric.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 22, 2021, 01:46:04 PM
In a playing of Any Number on Pluto TV today, Bob remarked that the contestant became close to becoming the first contestant to not light up any numbers in the car price before ending the game with the smaller prize or piggy bank. Has this ever happened since then?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 22, 2021, 01:55:50 PM
In a playing of Any Number on Pluto TV today, Bob remarked that the contestant became close to becoming the first contestant to not light up any numbers in the car price before ending the game with the smaller prize or piggy bank. Has this ever happened since then?

Considering this was 1982 or 1983 depending where they were in the cycle when it aired today, not only do I imagine it has since then, I bet it happened before then too given it was the 1st game played on the show ever 10 years before. Remember the Game Show Network promo about Bob's "erring" memory around historical moments even back in this era?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on January 22, 2021, 01:58:27 PM
^I was going to bring up the most recent Any Number wipeout, 10/15/2012, but Any Number was the car game for a long time, so I'd guess that's factually wrong as well.


around the 34:30 mark.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on January 22, 2021, 02:00:02 PM
^I was going to bring up the most recent Any Number wipeout, 10/15/2012, but Any Number was the car game for a long time, so I'd guess that's factually wrong as well.

Yeah I can't imagine it could be accurate 11 seasons in, considering the frequency in which it woulda been played, particularly in those early years with so few other games yet.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on January 31, 2021, 03:12:09 PM
Has anyone ever wiped out Punch-a-Bunch? As in, got all four SPs wrong and failed to earn a single punch?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on January 31, 2021, 03:21:02 PM
Has anyone ever wiped out Punch-a-Bunch? As in, got all four SPs wrong and failed to earn a single punch?
Supposedly happened once, back in Season 7 (the same season the game debuted).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on February 02, 2021, 02:40:03 AM
Has there been a Stack the Deck win, even with a GP pricing wipeout in Bob's era?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on February 02, 2021, 06:10:40 AM
I believe you're asking if anyone's ever won by nailing the price exactly with no help, and the answer is no.

(Also worth noting is that STD was played 19 times in its debut season... and 14 of them had all three GPs won. There was only one case of getting one free digit, and one case of a GP wipeout)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on February 10, 2021, 12:32:07 AM
Seeing the 4th of July episode (the first one really of its' kind in Price's history, as far as a themed show specifically to that date complete with set decor), from Season 36 posted tonight...I am wondering.....why was this never a regular thing in Barker's era? Did Bob just not want to do them, did the staff not....or what? I know the date itself would fall in the Summer Rerun period but...even as a one off it would seem to make sense to make it the annual thing its' become in the Carey era akin to the Christmas themed shows each year (or every other at least).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on February 10, 2021, 12:29:56 PM
Early in the Barker era there would be new episodes into the summer and even until just prior to the start of the new season but I believe once they began ending the season in June it would be only reruns until the season premiere in September. except for previously preempted episodes that were held over to after the end of the season. It might've just been they weren't able to tape an additional episode to air for the 4th because of how the episode order from CBS went. It would also depend on what programming CBS had on for the 4th that would've prevented a new episode of Price from airing.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on February 10, 2021, 07:13:51 PM
When the first four contestants are called down (pre-COVID with an audience present), do they have to stand at the podiums based on the order they were called (first called goes to red, second called blue, third called yellow, fourth called green)?

Or, do they just go to whatever podium they want to when running down to the podiums?

- actpir
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: RatRace10 on February 10, 2021, 07:27:54 PM
Whichever one they want, as long as it's not taken.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on February 10, 2021, 07:29:53 PM
When the first four contestants are called down (pre-COVID with an audience present), do they have to stand at the podiums based on the order they were called (first called goes to red, second called blue, third called yellow, fourth called green)?

Or, do they just go to whatever podium they want to when running down to the podiums?

- actpir
Anywhere they want, so long as it hasn't already been taken by one of the contestants before them.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on February 10, 2021, 07:37:01 PM
Secondary hypothesis: I think they are more or less directed to go to a specific podium, since the majority of the episodes this season have gone red, yellow, blue, green or yellow, red, green, blue, and recently some contestants have gone toward one podium and then jetted to another out of nowhere. However, there are have been a couple of aberrations to suggest that if they don't see where their directed to go to, the show doesn't reshoot and just goes with it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: BillyGr on February 10, 2021, 07:45:10 PM
Secondary hypothesis: I think they are more or less directed to go to a specific podium, since the majority of the episodes this season have gone red, yellow, blue, green or yellow, red, green, blue, and recently some contestants have gone toward one podium and then jetted to another out of nowhere. However, there are have been a couple of aberrations to suggest that if they don't see where their directed to go to, the show doesn't reshoot and just goes with it.

Seems the most sensible would be to fill the two middle ones first (whichever is closer to the side you come out), just since then the 3rd & 4th contestants wouldn't be walking behind the others to get to their spots.  Not that it probably matters as all are spaced out pretty well, just a bit less passing interaction that way.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on February 10, 2021, 07:48:31 PM
Note: Piggybacking off my question after reading the responses (thank you to those who have responded). Again, asking this regarding pre-COVID audiences.

So, if the first four can go to whatever podium they want to (assuming they are not directed where to go), the first one called could go to the green podium, letting them bid last during the 'one bid'?

- actpir
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on February 10, 2021, 08:41:19 PM
So, if the first four can go to whatever podium they want to (assuming they are not directed where to go), the first one called could go to the green podium, letting them bid last during the 'one bid'?
Could and frequently did (on pre-Covid recaps, look for a note towards the top about "first four order" or something like that).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on February 10, 2021, 11:44:34 PM
Is there any Dice Game wipeout with all four guesses in the numbers incorrect? I've never seen any playing since the game's inception, since the odds of failing to guess one right or roll a number exactly right would be very low.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on March 06, 2021, 08:41:25 AM
When did TPiR begin stationing a studio page at the front of the audience to assist contestants who may have trouble getting up the stairs? They're not there in the Pluto TV reruns, though I definitely remember one being there in the late-90's...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: temptation1979ga on March 06, 2021, 01:32:34 PM
I’ve seen a couple of the pages get camera time on these reruns and Bob even mentioned one by name, as he tried to stop a lady from going onstage as soon as her name was called, instead of stopping in Contestant’s Row first.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 06, 2021, 07:35:34 PM
Is there any Dice Game wipeout with all four guesses in the numbers incorrect? I've never seen any playing since the game's inception, since the odds of failing to guess one right or roll a number exactly right would be very low.

At minimum, it hasn't happened since Season 29, which is when tpirstats started keeping track.

Don't know for sure on the other 24 seasons of Dice Game's existence, but ever since tpirstats started tracking detailed stats, Dice Game has been played 366 times, and only 23 times has somebody rolled no ones/sixes/perfect numbers. So a contestant only gets the opportunity to make four bad decisions about once in every 16 playings.

If we guesstimate Dice Game gets played about 20 times per season, that leaves only about 30 contestants total from seasons 4-28 who had the OPPORTUNITY to get all four wrong. Maybe a few more accounting for its earliest playings where digits 0-9 were on the board.

Maybe one of those 30 was really dumb and got all four digits wrong (including the first digit), but it strikes me as extremely unlikely.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on March 06, 2021, 08:41:08 PM
At minimum, it hasn't happened since Season 29, which is when tpirstats started keeping track.

Don't know for sure on the other 24 seasons of Dice Game's existence, but ever since tpirstats started tracking detailed stats, Dice Game has been played 366 times, and only 23 times has somebody rolled no ones/sixes/perfect numbers. So a contestant only gets the opportunity to make four bad decisions about once in every 16 playings.

If we guesstimate Dice Game gets played about 20 times per season, that leaves only about 30 contestants total from seasons 4-28 who had the OPPORTUNITY to get all four wrong. Maybe a few more accounting for its earliest playings where digits 0-9 were on the board.

Maybe one of those 30 was really dumb and got all four digits wrong (including the first digit), but it strikes me as extremely unlikely.

You do have to factor in the smaller rotation of games in it's earlier per season numbers, especially the super super early ones. Each game typically gets played about what every week and a half or so roughly on the Pluto reruns, and you'd have to figure the earlier you go back from this period, the shorter the period of time between playings would be. Even factoring that in though, the odds are still pretty low I'd guess of this happening, given 4 rolls and at LEAST 2:6 odds under the standard rules of getting a guaranteed correct number on each one, with the odds going to 3:6 or 50:50 of getting one if the number isn't a 1 or 6 outright. Be interesting to find out for certain that said, but I'd suspect it is very uncommon at the very least.

EDIT: There's also the fact that when they went to the Deluxe Dice Game, it was pretty easy to guess early on what the second number in the price was (generally speaking a 1, 2 or at best maybe a 3), as most cars of that period, or at least the ones used in the game, weren't gonna be above $14,000. So that woulda made the odds of getting all 4 wrong even smaller, even in a case where the roll WASN'T a 1, 6 or the actual number.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on March 07, 2021, 03:07:02 AM
Just watching the tail end of the 3am Pluto airing, and I noticed that both Showcases were over $10,000 in price, which somehow surprised me. I'm not sure how often that's happened in episodes I've seen from this era, but I didn't expect it. When did this first happen on the daytime show? I can't imagine it was that all that long before this period.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actual_retail_tice on March 07, 2021, 12:20:50 PM
 
Just watching the tail end of the 3am Pluto airing, and I noticed that both Showcases were over $10,000 in price, which somehow surprised me. I'm not sure how often that's happened in episodes I've seen from this era, but I didn't expect it. When did this first happen on the daytime show? I can't imagine it was that all that long before this period.
I'm very interested in keeping track with how prices changed over the course of the show, but I can only guess at the answer to this. There was an episode from early in Season 11 (1982) where both showcases were WELL over $10,000; the low showcase was $13K. By 1982, both showcase being over $10,000 was definitely not the norm, but not all that rare, either. I would guess that it happened for the first time right after prices took a big jump around 1979 or 1980.

By 1986, and without any unusual jump in inflation to cause it, showcases under $10,000 abruptly became a lot less common, and I guess it was a choice on the producers' part.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on March 09, 2021, 06:01:14 AM
Note: I am asking two questions, but based around the same subject.

1. Why do contestants' name tags have their first legal name written, as in the name that is provided on their driver's license/I.D.?

2. If someone had a nickname/shortened name (Johnny for Jonathan for example), but it wasn't on their I.D., and they would rather have their nickname on their name tag as opposed to their first name, could they simply ask the person who writes names on name tags to put their nickname instead, or is that not allowed?

- actpir
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on March 09, 2021, 08:42:51 AM
Just a guess, but I presume it's much quicker to write dozens and dozens of name tags when you don't have to ask each person what they want written, and you can just go by the easier method of what's going to be on the official paperwork.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GoodStrategy on March 09, 2021, 10:05:53 AM
Regarding their "must use your legal name" policy, here's (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,27686.msg452316.html) a discussion from a few years back on how it would apply to transgender people who haven't legally changed their name.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on March 10, 2021, 09:47:43 AM
From that link:

Well now I’m a bit curious to know what would happen if I was on the show, because I go by my middle name in everyday life and always have.

Few people know or call me by my first name (even my own mother forgets it for legal purposes sometimes and I have to remind her), so I wouldn’t really want it to be on my name tag.

Price uses the legal first name as shown on an official ID. In addition to receiving a name tag that's your given first name, its always the legal full name as shown. That's why you saw few Pats and mostly Patricks and Patricias (or as Bob often pronounced it, PA-TRISH-CEEYA) for example.

There are two memorable episodes with this first/middle name episodes, in addition to a few other instances not mentioned. First, there was the Muriel/Colleen episode the day after the "microphone elbow" episode early in Season 11. She ended up receiving a Muriel/Colleen nametag during the SCSD. Bob even took it so far that in addition to calling other contestants by their middle names, he even called the show "The Right Is Price". Also, on the Bob Barker's 90th birthday episode, there was the Evelyn/Gail issue, and oddly that was the only contestant that Bob itself has ever called to Come on Down. Just like the show itself, the recap officially goes by the given first name on the contestant.

Personally, this affects myself as well since I've gone by my middle name since high school, but from what I've observed is that Drew isn't as much of a teaser with that as Bob was. I'd make my SCSD shout out to Gail and Colleen though as a tribute though.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on April 07, 2021, 03:39:33 PM
Bob mentioned on a May 1980 episode that was just linked to in the video collection section, that Roger had informed him before the show that they'd given away 25 million dollars worth of cash and prizes up to that date about 8 seasons into the show. Anyone have an estimate of how much they'd have given away now in 2021? I'd be curious. Has to be nearing the billion dollar mark by now if not over it I'd think, but that might be wrong.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on April 08, 2021, 02:19:46 PM
When I became keeper of the stats in season 36, one question I would naturally get is "How much has the show given away over the years?" And because I didn't have numbers for the first 30-some years of the show, I had no idea. I knew that in season 36, the show awarded $12,460,048 in cash and prizes (not including consolation prizes) and that the show didn't award nearly that much in season one, so I took a really rough guess and made "more than $250,000,000" the official company line throughout the early 2010s. The true total was probably higher, but that felt safe.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on April 08, 2021, 04:18:51 PM
I got bored and played around on the TIPRSTATS website.  (I hope that's not a dirty word in these parts!!)

Seasons 29-49 inclusive have a total winning amount of a little more than $254 Million. 

We might assume that Seasons 1 - 28 gave away $200 Million (It's a bit of a stretch, given inflation and all.  Just play along...).

If you add in the specials, you could reasonably estimate that Price has given away around $500 Million to date.

That's a pretty rough estimate, but I feel like I'm at least in the right neighborhood.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Mike_Tennant on June 08, 2021, 11:57:34 AM
I've noticed a few times in the Barker episodes on Pluto that when they give away a bar of gold, Johnny's copy will say something like "Retail value determined at the close of business on the day of taping." Unless the show was taped after the close of business, which I don't think it normally was, how did the staff determine the price to announce on air? Did they use the price from the previous day? If so, why not just say that instead?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 08, 2021, 01:25:13 PM
I've noticed a few times in the Barker episodes on Pluto that when they give away a bar of gold, Johnny's copy will say something like "Retail value determined at the close of business on the day of taping." Unless the show was taped after the close of business, which I don't think it normally was, how did the staff determine the price to announce on air? Did they use the price from the previous day? If so, why not just say that instead?

Assuming "business" means the NYSE, business closed at 4:00 Eastern, which is 1:00 Pacific.  I don't think there's anything unusual about that at all.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Mike_Tennant on June 08, 2021, 04:10:24 PM
Assuming "business" means the NYSE, business closed at 4:00 Eastern, which is 1:00 Pacific.  I don't think there's anything unusual about that at all.
Oh, yeah. I wasn't thinking about that, obviously. Thanks.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on June 21, 2021, 10:48:31 PM
It gets used so rarely of course, but I've always wondered if the Plinko stick is the same exact one that has been around since day one of Plinko. I know it looks the same, but hard to tell when it's not seen very often.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on June 23, 2021, 10:46:04 AM
In Punch-a-Bunch, is there someone offstage cueing Bob/Drew as to which hole to reveal next, or is it up to them to remember the correct order? I can't recall either one ever revealing the wrong hole, but it seems like it would be difficult to remember with so much else going on...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Ton80 on June 23, 2021, 04:08:03 PM
Quote from: SamJ93
In Punch-a-Bunch, is there someone offstage cueing Bob/Drew as to which hole to reveal next, or is it up to them to remember the correct order? I can't recall either one ever revealing the wrong hole, but it seems like it would be difficult to remember with so much else going on...

Many times over the years, Bob and Drew both can be seen asking someone off-camera which hole was next if they did not remember.  Sometimes it was presumably a production staff member (*ahem* Scott *cough*), and sometimes it was one of the models.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on June 23, 2021, 04:18:50 PM
Many times over the years, Bob and Drew both can be seen asking someone off-camera which hole was next if they did not remember.  Sometimes it was presumably a production staff member (*ahem* Scott *cough*), and sometimes it was one of the models.

The reason the model stays by the $10,000/$25,000 bill for the entire game is to be the person keeping track of the order in which the holes were punched. When I was there, I also kept track in case both parties forgot (a practice that I assume continues today), but if the host forgets the order, he turns to the model for the reminder.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actual_retail_tice on June 23, 2021, 04:28:10 PM
I even remember a time where Bob and Janice got into a lengthy discussion mid-game about how the Second Chance slips worked in the game. Punch a Bunch is surprisingly complex!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on June 24, 2021, 02:29:39 PM
I even remember a time where Bob and Janice got into a lengthy discussion mid-game about how the Second Chance slips worked in the game. Punch a Bunch is surprisingly complex!
Or, at least it WAS complex. The second change slips disappeared from the game more than 10 years ago.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: EaglesWings4500 on June 25, 2021, 11:31:46 AM
Hello

In the game 10 chances. Do the constants really have 10 seconds to write down their choices ?  I remember on an few shows Bob will say "Hurry, you have 10 seconds or you will lose your turn"   
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jlgarfield on June 25, 2021, 11:37:39 AM
I've noticed a few times in the Barker episodes on Pluto that when they give away a bar of gold, Johnny's copy will say something like "Retail value determined at the close of business on the day of taping." Unless the show was taped after the close of business, which I don't think it normally was, how did the staff determine the price to announce on air? Did they use the price from the previous day? If so, why not just say that instead?

To kind of expand on this, sometime in the early 1980s, this was changed to the "opening of business of day of taping".
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on June 25, 2021, 11:43:04 AM
Hello

In the game 10 chances. Do the constants really have 10 seconds to write down their choices ?  I remember on an few shows Bob will say "Hurry, you have 10 seconds or you will lose your turn"
It's in the rules of the game and there were playings early on where contestants lost a turn after 10 seconds, though it hasn't actually been enforced in many years.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FPGWillyT on June 25, 2021, 03:30:53 PM
To kind of expand on this, sometime in the early 1980s, this was changed to the "opening of business of day of taping".

Funny you bring that up.  Back in the day, I would make a point to find a LA Times on a morning I’d be seeing the show just in case…
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on July 06, 2021, 09:24:23 AM
I recently did a search for all the Range Game playings for a car, and saw a random 3-car half hour show. This was 1315D, March 07, 1975. The timeline does note it happened, but not why.

Quote
On Friday, every game, including both Grocery Game and Range Game, is played for a car. Range Game in particular is noteworthy, as it offers a $9,600 Cadillac. This is one of only four known episodes on which each game is played for a car, the other three being the ceremonial 5,000th episode in Season 26, the "teen drivers" episode in Season 40, and the "sweet 16" episode in Season 43.

Technically that blurb is now outdated because of all the DCW episodes, but does anyone know why this happened on a random March episode?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on July 06, 2021, 05:14:18 PM
Technically that blurb is now outdated because of all the DCW episodes

I really need to go through the timeline one of these days and update all those things that aren't (nearly) unique anymore.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 16, 2021, 06:51:08 AM
This may have been addressed elsewhere, but with a March 2000 rerun being just posted here...got to wondering, why was there a 2 week period of reruns at NCAA Tournament time at least near the end of Bob's run (appears it was reduced once Drew came aboard from looking)? The actual week of I can understand, but.....why the week before as well? Why would they have not just done one week? Bob's advanced age? Or what?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on July 16, 2021, 09:21:14 AM
The season in question (Season 28) would have been the only time within that period, if not ever, that there was a two-week break.  Every other year it was one week, if at all.  I figured that it was due to the tournament games amongst the Power Six conferences.  However, while they were played during the day, that would have been an issue earlier in the week.  Moreover, those games would have been on ESPN and the like, not on network television (until the weekend or weeknights maybe).

Plus, 1999-2000 was the year Bob had surgery which resulted in the loss of nearly 2 dozen tapings.  There was a week-long break very early in the 2000 segment of Season 28 in addition to those two consecutive weeks in March
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 21, 2021, 05:50:21 AM
What episode during Season 30 woulda been the first one taped post 9/11? Just thinking back to that and am curious. (Sidenote: mea culpa on the NCAA Tournament weeks question, somehow got my timing messed up, realized SeaBreeze was right, only 28 did have such a gap, just looked different to me going through seasons).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on July 21, 2021, 11:37:06 AM
Did they cancel taping the day of 9/11 or any days following? There also wouldn't be anything to really tell it was taped just after unless any contestants had the memorial ribbon on or were wearing a shirt with the American flag or had an American flag pin on or something like that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 21, 2021, 11:43:16 AM
Did they cancel taping the day of 9/11 or any days following? There also wouldn't be anything to really tell it was taped just after unless any contestants had the memorial ribbon on or were wearing a shirt with the American flag or had an American flag pin on or something like that.

Given the rest of Hollywood shut down for a good week (the Late Night shows I know at least all stopped running for about that period of time), I'd imagine as much. And yeah it mighta been although I could see a slightly subdued crowd/feel for at least the first show back.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on July 21, 2021, 01:45:57 PM
Did they cancel taping the day of 9/11 or any days following? There also wouldn't be anything to really tell it was taped just after unless any contestants had the memorial ribbon on or were wearing a shirt with the American flag or had an American flag pin on or something like that.

I don't believe there were any tapings scheduled for that week in the first place -- if I remember correctly, Rod was having cancer-related surgery the day of the attacks.

What episode during Season 30 woulda been the first one taped post 9/11?

With the above reasoning in mind, it would probably be 1943K, the first show with Burton Richardson announcing.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pricefan18 on July 21, 2021, 01:49:41 PM
I don't believe there were any tapings scheduled for that week in the first place -- if I remember correctly, Rod was having cancer-related surgery the day of the attacks.

He was. I remember I think the power went out or something day of? I thought I read something like that. They coulda scheduled tapings with Burton before that though, but hard to say.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on July 21, 2021, 04:05:58 PM
I don't remember which specific episode it was, but I do remember, as the episode aired a couple of months later, that the audience was noticeably less enthusiastic during the opening. Also, all of the trip prices were dramatically lower because of the airfare.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on October 01, 2021, 11:02:17 PM
Are there any photos of the Drew Dollar in existence?  I've been only able to find the clear shots of both sides of the Barker Dollar.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on October 09, 2021, 05:33:50 PM
Are there any videos anywhere of a third spinner spinning again despite being in the lead trying to get the dollar?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on October 10, 2021, 01:22:33 PM
Are there any videos anywhere of a third spinner spinning again despite being in the lead trying to get the dollar?

No, because if they don't get a dollar on their first spin, the Showcase Showdown ends immediately.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on October 10, 2021, 02:15:42 PM
No, because if they don't get a dollar on their first spin, the Showcase Showdown ends immediately.
I know, but Bob would say if the 3rd spinner took the lead (without the 1st 2 having gone over) "You don't want to spin again, do you?", which nobody (that I saw) ever did, but people on here have said it did and I was wondering if there was a video.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on October 10, 2021, 04:40:50 PM
I know, but Bob would say if the 3rd spinner took the lead (without the 1st 2 having gone over) "You don't want to spin again, do you?", which nobody (that I saw) ever did, but people on here have said it did and I was wondering if there was a video.


I think that's cliche or whatever.  Typically, Dig We Must starts playing a tad bit before Bob would ask.  "You don't want to spin again, do you?  No, I'm good.  Nooooo!"  That's pretty much what happens.  Plus, outside of a spin-off, it's rare in this instance since the score to beat is usually a moderate to above average score (i.e. 50 cents).  No one's spinning again when they've clinched a spot in the showcase.

Dylan, I think you might be mistaken [spinning third for a dollar] for people that may have spun if the third spinner tied the leader on his or her first spin.  That has actually happened, but it's usually a low score (maybe 35 cents or less).  The odds to get a dollar are still low with a risk to go over (which is also slim depending on what the spinner landed on first).  However, the odds to go for the win over taking a chance at a one-shot spinoff are better if there's a tie with a low score.

As mentioned, it's over when the third spinner gets a leading score.  The object of the SCSD is for the participants to get closest to $1.00 without going over.  While $11,000 (now $26,000) is nice, it's still a bonus within that segment
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on October 10, 2021, 04:55:13 PM

I think that's cliche or whatever.  Typically, Dig We Must starts playing a tad bit before Bob would ask.  "You don't want to spin again, do you?  No, I'm good.  Nooooo!"  That's pretty much what happens.  Plus, outside of a spin-off, it's rare in this instance since the score to beat is usually a moderate to above average score (i.e. 50 cents).  No one's spinning again when they've clinched a spot in the showcase.
You're right about that. Although somebody somewhere here did state that somebody did spin again despite being the last spinner having taken the lead to try to get the $1 and went over.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on October 10, 2021, 09:30:05 PM
I know, but Bob would say if the 3rd spinner took the lead (without the 1st 2 having gone over) "You don't want to spin again, do you?", which nobody (that I saw) ever did, but people on here have said it did and I was wondering if there was a video.

Fair point.  I misread the question.  My bad.

As mentioned, it's over when the third spinner gets a leading score.  The object of the SCSD is for the participants to get closest to $1.00 without going over.  While $11,000 (now $26,000) is nice, it's still a bonus within that segment

Actually, I'm pretty sure this is wrong -- the goal of the Showcase Showdown is certainly to determine who goes to the Showcase, but I don't think there's a rule that says the third contestant can't spin twice if them going over would still result in someone winning.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on October 11, 2021, 12:09:18 AM
Fair point.  I misread the question.  My bad.

Actually, I'm pretty sure this is wrong -- the goal of the Showcase Showdown is certainly to determine who goes to the Showcase, but I don't think there's a rule that says the third contestant can't spin twice if them going over would still result in someone winning.
You're right on that. Drew doesn't ask because it would be mind-numbingly stupid to do that, but Bob would usually prompt the 3rd contestant to spin again, but nobody that I saw ever did. I do wonder what Drew's reaction would be if somebody made the mind-numbingly stupid decision to spin again despite being the 3rd spinner and having already taken the lead.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on October 11, 2021, 06:34:52 AM
Fair point.  I misread the question.  My bad.

FWIW, I initially was in the middle of typing up the same thing as a response before I reread and realized I had read the question wrong and didn’t actually know the answer.

I do wonder what Drew's reaction would be if somebody made the mind-numbingly stupid decision to spin again despite being the 3rd spinner and having already taken the lead.

I can’t see Drew letting somebody throw away a guarantee in the showcase for a 1-in-20 shot at $1,000 without an “uh, are you SURE?”, but if the rules allow for it I imagine his hands might be tied as a host.

For example, he can’t ask somebody who bids $1 under somebody else in Contestants Row if they’re sure they want to do that since he could potentially cost them $500 if they’re right. (I was in studio when it happened and it caused a stopdown, and Drew had to explain to the audience why he wasn’t allowed to try to talk her out of it.) Excessive persuasion might change the winner.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GoodStrategy on October 11, 2021, 09:50:19 AM
IIRC the 3rd spinner is not allowed to spin again only if both previous contestants went over (and that's because you'd have the possibility of no one from that set of three qualifying for the Showcase). If at least one of them didn't went over, I don't believe it is against the rules for 3rd to spin again (although if he or she has beaten both previous spinners it'd be a stupid play of course).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on October 20, 2021, 09:04:12 AM
While we talk about "Showcase Showdown" oddities (3rd spinner spinning again after beating the leader, voluntarily spinning again on 75), we've never talked about staying on an unusually low number before. Barring instances where the 1st and 2nd spinners either both went over (meaning the 3rd spinner is only spinning to try to get the $1) or one or both had a low score such as 35, meaning the 3rd spinner only needed 40 to win, what's the lowest anybody has ever stayed on? I've seen 2 instances of somebody staying on 40, but has anybody stayed lower than that before, or is 40 the lowest anybody has ever stayed on?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on October 26, 2021, 04:49:57 PM
I've been on a kick of watching old episodes again. I looked around and didn't see anything about this, although I thought it had been discussed before. When did Bob stop chatting with the audience/contestants at the top of the show when he came out? I know it was sometime in the later 90s. I guess they made him stop to allow more commercial time? I always enjoyed his banter; hated how he rushed straight to the first IUFB in later years.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gameshowfan on November 06, 2021, 04:16:06 PM
I started watching in the early-to-mid '90s, and I never saw an ep. with opening chat (I remember seeing the debut of Barker's Markers in 1994 in first-run).  So it may have been earlier than the '90s.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on November 30, 2021, 07:20:45 PM
Hi, everyone. This is actpir.

I have a question that I would like to ask regarding "The Price is Right: Live!". Moderators, if this is not the appropriate place to ask a question about the traveling version of the show, please move this post to the appropriate place.

TPIR: Live! is scheduled to come to my area in Spring 2022. I am thinking about going. However, I do have a question about being selected to 'come on down'.

Silly question, but if by any chance I am selected to 'come on down' for any segment of the live show (one bid, pricing game, SCSD, SC, etc.) will this affect my eligibility for appearing on a televised game show? In other words, will I have to wait a certain period of time after appearing on TPIR: Live! before I can appear on another game show?

Thank you for your answers.

- actpir
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on November 30, 2021, 09:17:42 PM
You don’t lose your eligibility for televised Price, or any other game show for that matter.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jlgarfield on November 30, 2021, 10:09:41 PM
Can we revise the General Questions section about GSN and the Pluto TV Bob Barker TPiR channel?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DylanBe on January 20, 2022, 03:28:39 PM
Is there a video clip anywhere of Stephen's painful Punch-a-Bunch bailout with $1,500 and then missing out on the $10,000 from October 17, 2002?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on January 25, 2022, 11:41:42 AM
Has any contestant in Punch-a-Bunch ever punched 4 holes consecutively in a single row or column?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on January 25, 2022, 01:27:25 PM
IIRC Ted Slauson did in the Perfect Bid documentary.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on January 28, 2022, 12:54:31 PM
Going back and watching it again, he actually punched in a pattern of every other hole on the second row. Eh...close enough.  ;-)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on January 28, 2022, 10:53:50 PM
Is the complete Ted Slauson episode available online?  Or are we going to have to wait until it airs on Pluto?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpirguyMN on January 28, 2022, 11:53:55 PM
Yes, it is on YouTube.  Just search "Perfect Bid" and it should come up.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on January 30, 2022, 03:27:38 AM
Is the complete Ted Slauson episode available online?  Or are we going to have to wait until it airs on Pluto?
Yes, it is on YouTube.  Just search "Perfect Bid" and it should come up.

That's the Terry Kneiss episode (2008).  I was asking about the one where Ted Slauson was finally called down to Contestants' Row (1992).  There were clips of his appearance in the "Perfect Bid" movie but I'd like to see the complete show.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpirguyMN on January 30, 2022, 12:17:36 PM
That's the Terry Kneiss episode (2008).  I was asking about the one where Ted Slauson was finally called down to Contestants' Row (1992).  There were clips of his appearance in the "Perfect Bid" movie but I'd like to see the complete show.

Whoops, my mistake!  Misunderstood your question.  I have not seen his episode anywhere, so guessing we will have to wait.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on February 21, 2022, 10:46:10 AM
Was there a rule in Hit Me that a contestant had to pick at least two items?

I ask because in a recent playing on Pluto, the house had 14 and drew a 10 to bust--meaning the contestant could have picked any two items/cards and still won (and didn't keep drawing eventually busting themselves). But would they have been allowed to stop with just one card or even not picked at all?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on February 21, 2022, 12:21:45 PM
Mathematically, it's impossible to bust with two cards. I'm sure the answer is there's no rule against it, but it'd be really dumb if you did.

There's no way Bob would have allowed a contestant to "stay" with a 0.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on February 21, 2022, 12:58:54 PM
Has a zero ever been part of the fake price on One Away? If so, would the possible choices be “up to a 1” and “down to a 9?”

To that point, has a nine ever been part of the fake price on One Away, which would give choices of “up to a 0” and “down to an 8?”
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on February 21, 2022, 01:12:25 PM
Has a zero ever been part of the fake price on One Away? If so, would the possible choices be “up to a 1” and “down to a 9?”

To that point, has a nine ever been part of the fake price on One Away, which would give choices of “up to a 0” and “down to an 8?”

According to the relevant FAQ section at http://www.golden-road.net/gr_faq/index.php?title=The_Pricing_Games#One_Away -
Quote
For the purposes of this game, 0 and 9 are considered to be “one away” from each other. Those two digits are generally not used in the wrong price, but it has happened on occasion.

The Timeline doesn't appear to identify any particular playings, however.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on February 21, 2022, 02:44:06 PM
Was there a rule in Hit Me that a contestant had to pick at least two items?

I ask because in a recent playing on Pluto, the house had 14 and drew a 10 to bust--meaning the contestant could have picked any two items/cards and still won (and didn't keep drawing eventually busting themselves). But would they have been allowed to stop with just one card or even not picked at all?

As mentioned by 9821, someone settling with zero ain't happening.  While I don't know whether there's an actual rule for or against it, I'd bet that there is.  In the game of Blackjack, guests at a casino typically don't decline a second card.  while it's possible to have a total of 2, you need two cards for a valid hand.  Therefore, in Hit Me, people draw two cards; regardless of the total, they're not ever going to be over 21
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on February 21, 2022, 02:44:23 PM
Was there a rule in Hit Me that a contestant had to pick at least two items?

I ask because in a recent playing on Pluto, the house had 14 and drew a 10 to bust--meaning the contestant could have picked any two items/cards and still won (and didn't keep drawing eventually busting themselves). But would they have been allowed to stop with just one card or even not picked at all?

The contestant plays first, so they have no idea what the house's hidden card is, much less whether they will bust or not. So there's no reason for the contestant to draw fewer than two cards.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on February 22, 2022, 02:54:43 AM
It's been a long time since I've seen Hit Me's official rule sheet, but I would guess that there's no hard rule that the contestant has to draw any cards, partly because that's true in Card Game and partly because Hit Me's rules are such a mess that the official rules for some situations involving aces were literally "Whatever Bob decides to do today."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Guint on February 22, 2022, 12:53:02 PM
And yet the game still somehow lasted over 25 years? Wow.

The more I hear about Hit Me, the more I'm glad it's gone.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on February 22, 2022, 02:12:39 PM
Has a zero ever been part of the fake price on One Away? If so, would the possible choices be “up to a 1” and “down to a 9?”

I'm sure if Pluto goes far enough, we'll see it happen. But the digits allowing the number line to loop still exist in storage.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on February 22, 2022, 02:51:09 PM
I'm sure if Pluto goes far enough, we'll see it happen. But the digits allowing the number line to loop still exist in storage.

Whoa, that looks awesome!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on March 07, 2022, 02:14:50 AM
Half-serious and half-joking question here: has Pathfinder ever been played for a Nissan Pathfinder?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on March 07, 2022, 02:41:34 AM
Based on a search of the recaps, there appear to be few to no instances of the vehicle appearing in Pathfinder. Threads here containing discussions about Pathfinder being played for a namesake SUV as old as 2006 have also appeared in the results, but they only showed what-if scenarios. It would be awesome, though, if we finally got to see that happen, since Pathfinders were around two years before PF's debut.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JhayPrice on March 07, 2022, 03:05:11 AM
Are the pair of coins (courtesy of https://allaboutpins.com/blog/price-is-right-challenge-coins-welcome-drew-carey-as-a-host) seen at the bottom of this image still the actual Drew Dollars used until today in the Balance Game? If so, I think that it's very cool that they just modified the design of the Barker Dollar to be used for Drew's tenure as host and to somewhat retain continuity regarding the design. 

(https://i.postimg.cc/kXLCsbLp/hostdollar.png)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: brosa0 on March 07, 2022, 04:27:57 AM
Has a zero ever been part of the fake price on One Away? If so, would the possible choices be “up to a 1” and “down to a 9?”

To that point, has a nine ever been part of the fake price on One Away, which would give choices of “up to a 0” and “down to an 8?”

Australian TPIR had this bizarre setup once, to give an idea of what it looks like.

(https://i.imgur.com/ORFljTs.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/zwQf4rb.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on March 07, 2022, 05:45:49 PM
Are the pair of coins (courtesy of https://allaboutpins.com/blog/price-is-right-challenge-coins-welcome-drew-carey-as-a-host) seen at the bottom of this image still the actual Drew Dollars used until today in the Balance Game?

I don't remember what the tails side looked like, but that is indeed what the heads side of the Drew Dollar looked like when I was there.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on March 10, 2022, 07:37:01 AM
Is there a reason why the Target Price in Grand Game has become a nice number usually ending in “.00” or “.50”? In the Barker Era, the target prices had a good variety to them, but today, it seems like the target price is always something like “5.50” which makes the game slightly less interesting.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: urbanpreppie0004 on March 10, 2022, 10:30:43 AM
 :roll:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperSweeper on March 10, 2022, 03:19:03 PM
Does anyone happen to know the name/artist of the cue used in the closing of this episode?

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on March 10, 2022, 03:48:48 PM
Is there a reason why the Target Price in Grand Game has become a nice number usually ending in “.00” or “.50”? In the Barker Era, the target prices had a good variety to them, but today, it seems like the target price is always something like “5.50” which makes the game slightly less interesting.

My guess is that there's really no reason not to use a round number, especially since inflation has led to larger prices.

To that point, does anyone know if a Grand Game target price that was larger than $9.99? It looks like the digital display on the current prop only has room for the dollar sign, the decimal point, and three digits.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CJBojangles on March 10, 2022, 04:35:30 PM
They’ve definitely used two digit target prices, but it’s been a few years. There is a separate graphic (https://youtu.be/Ux_7hXsWb_M) with five places when targets $10 and over are used.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on March 10, 2022, 04:52:56 PM
They’ve definitely used two digit target prices, but it’s been a few years. There is a separate graphic (https://youtu.be/Ux_7hXsWb_M) with five places when targets $10 and over are used.

Wow, thanks. Hadn’t seen that before. I’m guessing it’s similar to the One Bid (five-digit) displays in that regard.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on March 10, 2022, 05:13:11 PM
It's easy to forget with the digital displays these days there really is no trouble just squeezing an extra digit onto the readouts. I imagine bidding 6 or 7 digits on a showcase can be done these days with relative ease. Not that I'd recommend doing that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on March 10, 2022, 06:18:38 PM
:roll:

Not sure why the eye roll for a legitimate question, I’ve wondered myself.

I’ve noticed (and this is without any sources, just observing), that when the target price ends in .50, there is almost always (unless it’s a special playing they want won), an item that’s 51 cents less than that. So a $4.99 item for a $5.50 target, for example. Maybe because it may be easier to find items that end in .99, this is why they want x.50 targets?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on March 10, 2022, 06:35:06 PM
Not sure why the eye roll for a legitimate question, I’ve wondered myself.

I’ve noticed (and this is without any sources, just observing), that when the target price ends in .50, there is almost always (unless it’s a special playing they want won), an item that’s 51 cents less than that. So a $4.99 item for a $5.50 target, for example. Maybe because it may be easier to find items that end in .99, this is why they want x.50 targets?
To be totally honest, it really doesn't matter what the target price is...

If you number each grocery item in the game from 1 to 6, with 1 the least expensive, and 6 the most expensive, as long as you have a target price that is higher than 4, but lower than 5, it doesn't matter where that price falls within that range, the game will still play out just the same.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on March 10, 2022, 08:22:54 PM
In the Barker Era, the target prices had a good variety to them, but today, [rounding to the nearest 50 cents] makes the game slightly less interesting.

The eyeroll was to something the Barker era did "better" that is currently "worse" by comparison.

I do think Grand Game is less interesting nowadays because we have several cash games that offer more than $10k, but again, that number doesn't really matter when this game is just a 2-4 Hi-Lo.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on March 10, 2022, 08:32:15 PM
I’m perfectly okay with the cash prize as is - Grand Game’s $10,000 is won considerably more than $25,000 on Punch, $16,000 on Bag, $20,000 on Hot Seat, etc.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GuyWithFace on March 10, 2022, 10:54:36 PM
Perhaps better questions In relation to the target price in Grand Game would be as follows...
-What is the lowest value used? ($1.09, seen on the November 10, 1980 episode, is the lowest I have found thus far.)
-When did it cease ending in numbers other than 5 or 0? (A $1.33 value was utilized on the January 20, 1986 episode, thereby limiting this change to no earlier than the second half of Season 14.)
-When did it switch to solely ending in .00 or .50? (One of $2.10 was utilized on the April 23, 1990 episode, thereby limiting this change to no earlier than the last portion of Season 18.)

To that point, does anyone know if a Grand Game target price that was larger than $9.99?
Indeed there were, and at least three times it was very very much higher than $9.99 -- the Doug Davidson series, which utilized small prizes rather than grocery products, had target prices which included $60, $120, and $125. In these instances, cents were not included on the target price display nor in the values of the small prizes.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Punchboard91 on March 10, 2022, 11:05:26 PM
Checking the stats site, October 23 and November 4, 2014, had targets of $4.25 and $4.75, respectively. After that, it’s been all x.50 or x.00.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on March 13, 2022, 07:23:04 PM
Are the pair of coins (courtesy of https://allaboutpins.com/blog/price-is-right-challenge-coins-welcome-drew-carey-as-a-host) seen at the bottom of this image still the actual Drew Dollars used until today in the Balance Game? If so, I think that it's very cool that they just modified the design of the Barker Dollar to be used for Drew's tenure as host and to somewhat retain continuity regarding the design.

(https://i.postimg.cc/kXLCsbLp/hostdollar.png)

As someone with an interest in Numismatics (hence my user name), I always wondered what the Barker Dollars looked like.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on March 13, 2022, 08:37:07 PM
Why are “the Big Three” played less today than they’ve ever been played? The show can’t be on “budget mode” for a decade.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on March 13, 2022, 09:20:00 PM
Why are “the Big Three” played less today than they’ve ever been played? The show can’t be on “budget mode” for a decade.
They've probably fallen into a habit of only scheduling them to come up during a sweeps week/gimmick event. Not sure that's what you'd call a "reason", though.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on March 14, 2022, 11:02:00 PM
Half-serious and half-joking question here: has Pathfinder ever been played for a Nissan Pathfinder?

I had also always wondered if Hole in One was played for a Volkswagen Golf! I'm hoping someday it is.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on March 14, 2022, 11:54:55 PM
This may seem random, but I thought of it after seeing one of today's episodes of Classic Concentration on Buzzr... I know that TPIR has had wheelchair-bound contestants before... my question is, if they were to win their way to the Showcases, how would their presence affect the staging? I'm assuming that the podium would obstruct, if not outright block, their view if they sat behind it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on March 15, 2022, 03:07:59 AM
The director/producer would make the call on how to stage it, but a few options:
1) Set the contestant’s wheelchair on two apple boxes (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_box)
2) Have the contestant to the side of the podium rather than behind it
3) Keep both contestants standing on the stage, but move them forward and set both showcase podiums on the step below
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on March 15, 2022, 01:14:20 PM
It's easy to forget with the digital displays these days there really is no trouble just squeezing an extra digit onto the readouts. I imagine bidding 6 or 7 digits on a showcase can be done these days with relative ease. Not that I'd recommend doing that.

To be fair, contestants don’t need to bid six digits. We’ve had plenty of people win their showcase and finish with over $100,000, and the display handled it just fine. I loved the original eggcrate display, but it felt weird for it to only show the difference of “$239” after a DSW led to the biggest win in daytime history.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on March 15, 2022, 11:21:32 PM
I know that TPIR has had wheelchair-bound contestants before... my question is, if they were to win their way to the Showcases, how would their presence affect the staging?

This has happened at least once before (although I can't remember the year). The contestant in a wheelchair was the top winner, so they were positioned to the camera-right side of the display. Presumably, a runner-up would be positioned directly camera-left of their display.

That staging may not have been achievable prior to season 38, but there's enough room up there now to pull it off.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PimpinJC on March 21, 2022, 07:19:08 PM
In 10 Chances, has there ever been a repeated digit as a number choice?  I can’t recall ever seeing a playing myself that had one.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on March 29, 2022, 09:47:42 AM
I was watching a 1989 episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhrYVsnjJrU) and in Squeeze Play's trip presentation, they used 1 Right Price stands to hold some photos that the camera later zoomed in on:

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/560639249511219210/958360764773699654/unknown.png)

(Sorry for the poor quality, it's a rough VHS recording.)

I see now this is noted in this site's Timeline. Was this sort of presentation used often? How often were pricing game props ever used for prize presentations? (The back-side of the Five Price Tags lights notwithstanding.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: johnnymatch on March 31, 2022, 02:33:30 PM
Reinventing the wheel:

Who is the person who designed the Big Wheel, converting from the standard upright casino/carnival structure to what we’ve known for 45+ years?

Who reinvented the wheel?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on May 15, 2022, 07:23:35 PM
Does the platform in front of Door 4 have a name?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: nowhammies11 on June 02, 2022, 10:41:38 AM
Does the platform in front of Door 4 have a name?


The FAQ has it listed as the Plinko Perch, from its original purpose of holding the sign at the back of the house.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 02, 2022, 01:41:47 PM
The FAQ has it listed as the Plinko Perch

It does? :confused:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: nowhammies11 on June 02, 2022, 02:30:16 PM
I'll be damned, I suppose not. I could have sworn...


<goes back to lurk mode>
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CaptainPrice on June 15, 2022, 10:09:45 PM
When the Price is Right switched directors throughout the years, what exactly changed on the show with the new director? I know small bits and pieces of what they did.

I know when Paul Alter became director in 1986, he changed the money win graphics twice: from Marc Breslow's Grand Game style to a generic one that lasted from 1987-1992, then he changed it to the star-shaped ones in late 1992 that remained until Bob retired in 2007. Bart Eskander simplified the camera transitions when he became director and wasn't too popular with fans. I don't know much about the other directors.

It's really interesting what styles the directors have done on the show over the past 50 seasons.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on June 28, 2022, 12:14:25 AM
We've seen contestants get injured after celebrating a pricing game win; in fact, we just had one this season.

My question is: has any contestant gotten injured DURING a pricing game (such as Time Is Money, Race Game, etc.), and if so, how was it handled on air?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: tpiradam on June 28, 2022, 01:02:41 AM
The closest incident I can recall was a woman who was playing Race Game. On her way to the jukebox she slipped on the floor and slid right into the jukebox. Took her a couple seconds to get back up but when she did she pulled the lever and had all 4 right. I feel like if it were anything major or serious they'd stop tape, make sure the contestant was alright and then reset.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Timotheus on June 28, 2022, 09:16:58 AM
My question is: has any contestant gotten injured DURING a pricing game (such as Time Is Money, Race Game, etc.), and if so, how was it handled on air?

This site's FAQ Timeline has a few incidents mentioned, although technically none during the gameplay portion of a pricing game:

February 16, 1998: "Monday show features Scott, the well-known contestant who injured his knee before a playing of Dice Game; in the wake of his injury, Bob spins the Big Wheel for him."

January 14, 2014: "Judy, the winner of the second Showcase Showdown, hurts her ankle during a wheelie and requires crutches (and eventually a chair) for the rest of the show; to accommodate her, the Showcase is conducted in front of the Turntable. Drew assures the audience that she will be sent to the hospital as soon as the taping ends."

May 20, 2021: "On Thursday, while celebrating winning Grocery Game, contestant David trips over the left side of the Turntable's "doorframe," breaks several of its lights, and ends up stumbling down the stairs behind it; fortunately, he is not badly injured, although his right hand is noticeably bandaged for the rest of the show."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Casey on June 28, 2022, 03:57:21 PM
This site's FAQ Timeline has a few incidents mentioned, although technically none during the gameplay portion of a pricing game:

February 16, 1998: "Monday show features Scott, the well-known contestant who injured his knee before a playing of Dice Game; in the wake of his injury, Bob spins the Big Wheel for him."


I don't believe this is correct.  Scott injured his knee after playing Dice Game (jumping up and down after he won).  Bob did spin the wheel for him and I think he was in a director's chair for the Showcases.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperSweeper on June 28, 2022, 04:15:49 PM
I don't believe this is correct.  Scott injured his knee after playing Dice Game (jumping up and down after he won).  Bob did spin the wheel for him and I think he was in a director's chair for the Showcases.

No, he injured his knee originally when the car was revealed. He injured it for a second time when he lost the car at the end of the game.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PimpinJC on July 09, 2022, 03:12:22 PM
After watching the collection of Davidson Price is Right clips on YouTube (about half the full run of the show), I have to wonder why the producers never bothered to reuse the old clips for The Price WAS Right segment.  I mean, the prizes themselves were seen quite frequently repeated, especially all of the small prizes.  Taping only 3 episodes per studio audience seemed like it would have been a no brainer to at least repeat them.  At least then, they could’ve avoided using the Big Wheel for the Showcase Showdown segment during then run.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on July 09, 2022, 09:17:37 PM
Most of the clips were from the 1950s and '60s. They easily could have used more 1970s content, since even by 1994, something in 1979 dollars was still noticeably less, not to mention lots of discontinued items, plus the '70s were starting to be seen as "cool" again. They easily could have delved into Paley Center archives for commercials, followed by researching old newspapers for prices similar to Now... or Then. Better yet, they could have used Cullen-era clips as well. But the biggest flaw for The Price Was Right was that the top winner had a huge advantage, where you'd either bid $1, $1 over the highest opponent, or $1 over the second highest bidder. If they had a rule where the contestants could right down the prices for each prize (a la Final Jeopardy!, with electronic light pens, with a tiebreaker for the same bid determined by who locks in first), it could have been a more interesting way to play. This brings up my next question:

Had The New Price Is Right (1994) used one-bids where four contestants came on down, would you have supported the Final Jeopardy!-style bidding, where each contestant had ten seconds to bid, with the closest/quickest without going over wins and gets to play a pricing game? In addition, what about a Showcase where all three contestants also write their bids for one Showcase only (no bidding/passing, just the closest without going over wins, and a triple overbid meaning that nobody wins the Showcase)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PimpinJC on July 09, 2022, 09:31:12 PM
But the biggest flaw for The Price Was Right was that the top winner had a huge advantage, where you'd either bid $1, $1 over the highest opponent, or $1 over the second highest bidder.
I’ve seen this mentioned in the FAQ here, but after watching all of those episodes on YouTube, I never saw the contestants line up where the top winner bid / spun last or even first.  Every episode I saw, the contestants lined up in the order in which they were called up on-stage.

But yes, I agree the 3 person TPWR showdown didn’t offer much strategy.  Maybe it gave contestant #3 the best opportunity to win a car?  Out of all the episodes on YouTube, a car game was never played 3rd, whereas the Showcase most often contained one.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 09, 2022, 11:22:14 PM
I’ve seen this mentioned in the FAQ here, but after watching all of those episodes on YouTube, I never saw the contestants line up where the top winner bid / spun last or even first.  Every episode I saw, the contestants lined up in the order in which they were called up on-stage.
Likewise, this reminds me of something I saw in the FAQ... for the very short-lived 1972 game Double Bullseye, the FAQ says "There doesn’t seem to have been a hard and fast rule regarding which contestant started the bidding in Double Bullseye. It began with the first One-Bid winner on its 2nd, 3rd, and 4th playings and with the second One-Bid winner on its 1st playing."

I've seen both the first and third daytime playings, and in both, I observed that Bob started the bidding with whichever player was standing at the yellow podium.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on July 10, 2022, 04:41:35 AM
Had The New Price Is Right (1994) used one-bids where four contestants came on down, would you have supported the Final Jeopardy!-style bidding, where each contestant had ten seconds to bid, with the closest/quickest without going over wins and gets to play a pricing game? In addition, what about a Showcase where all three contestants also write their bids for one Showcase only (no bidding/passing, just the closest without going over wins, and a triple overbid meaning that nobody wins the Showcase)?

Sure, there are plenty of "fairer" ways to do Contestant's Row than down-the-line-one-person-one-bid, but there's a reason it's endured for 66 years.

One Bids are simple, quick, fun to watch, easy to understand, and invite the home viewer to have a quick reaction like "it's way more than that" or "one-up that guy" or "what a dumb bid" or "bid a dollar, these guys are crazy". They set the tone for the pricing games without upstaging them.

If you replace it with ten seconds of think music and secret bids, you lose that immediate viewer reaction. Secret bids might be more fair, but open bids make a better show.

I’ve seen this mentioned in the FAQ here, but after watching all of those episodes on YouTube, I never saw the contestants line up where the top winner bid / spun last or even first.  Every episode I saw, the contestants lined up in the order in which they were called up on-stage.

But yes, I agree the 3 person TPWR showdown didn’t offer much strategy.  Maybe it gave contestant #3 the best opportunity to win a car?  Out of all the episodes on YouTube, a car game was never played 3rd, whereas the Showcase most often contained one.

I've not watched a ton of TNPIR, but after reading I checked out the first five random episodes that popped up on YouTube with TPWR; sure enough, the purple contestant won four out of five times.

My fix: scrap TPWR, have all three contestants bidding on the showcases, but Cullen-style where contestants have multiple chances to either raise their bid or freeze. Require the winning bid to be within a $3,000-$5,000 range if you don't want to give away a $35,000 showcase every night.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on July 10, 2022, 12:19:19 PM
This discussion also begs the question of why they didn't just use the Big Wheel to determine who goes into the Showcase. It's such an iconic part of the show and they did use it for some of the episodes, so why did they feel the need to create a new element to determine who goes into the Showcase? Was it that the powers that be at the daytime show didn't want them to use the wheel, or was it more change just for the sake of change?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 10, 2022, 02:03:30 PM
This discussion also begs the question of why they didn't just use the Big Wheel to determine who goes into the Showcase. It's such an iconic part of the show and they did use it for some of the episodes, so why did they feel the need to create a new element to determine who goes into the Showcase? Was it that the powers that be at the daytime show didn't want them to use the wheel, or was it more change just for the sake of change?
Knowing Jonathan Goodson, it was purely change for the sake of change (as the whole of TNPIR '94 was, if you think about it).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Axl on July 10, 2022, 02:38:49 PM
Was it that the powers that be at the daytime show didn't want them to use the wheel, or was it more change just for the sake of change?

I think it was just one of those things they wanted to shake up. The Big Wheel is iconic, but arguably the weakest iconic element of the show. Has nothing to do with pricing, is mostly chance, takes up a lot of time, and absent a dollar or a spin-off, is often not particularly exciting. The Price Was Right had a solid and pretty fun premise that fit easily into the show (and was temporarily revived in a slightly different form with Back in '72), despite the complications that resulted from only having 3 contestants.

They easily could have delved into Paley Center archives for commercials, followed by researching old newspapers for prices similar to Now... or Then.

Video in the Paley Center archives is not available for commercial use. And even when you can find the video, licensing issues can get very complicated, which apparently is what happened with this game. If you find a commercial you like, who actually owns it? The advertiser, or the ad agency that produced it? You need to know to get permission. Even if it fell into the public domain, there may be music in it that still needs to be cleared. Are the actors in it owed residuals? Was there any litigation connected to the commercial or the product? What if the commercial is for a product that competes with one of your real sponsors. Doing these clearances is a long process.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: PimpinJC on July 10, 2022, 08:35:15 PM
Was it that the powers that be at the daytime show didn't want them to use the wheel, or was it more change just for the sake of change?
Well, outside of the odd use of it being for Clock Game, the sole purpose of the video wall was to show the TPWR clip.  My guess is that the powers that be used this version somewhat as an experiment of what a modern version of Price could look like and what all changes could eventually be incorporated into the daytime show; hence why we saw an episode with a completely different Plinko layout to potentially make it easier to get a full $25,000 win (the triple 0 / double 5000, which lasted 1 episode), elimination of trip skins to just show the trip on the video wall (again, lasting only 1 episode), different prize reveals like in Safe Crackers to eliminate a potential winning edge, eliminating grocery items, etc.

I’d take a guess and say the video wall was conceived first as the turntable in the powers that be eyes probably looked too old fashioned for a modern show, and TPWR segment was born to find a use for it.  After all, I remember it being discussed that there was a push to remove the turntable after Bob retired and bring back the video wall.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FDRfan on July 18, 2022, 05:56:03 PM
When did TPIR start using the  $1000 graphic with the red outline when someone hit a 1.00 during the showcase showdown during the Barker Era?   


Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on July 18, 2022, 08:02:19 PM
When did TPIR start using the  $1000 graphic with the red outline when someone hit a 1.00 during the showcase showdown during the Barker Era?   

Season 21.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CaptainPrice on July 23, 2022, 12:23:06 AM
The star-shaped "money win" graphics were definitely in place by November 30, 1992's episode. It might have been a week earlier, but that's the earliest known instance to my knowledge.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 23, 2022, 01:44:09 AM
The star-shaped "money win" graphics were definitely in place by November 30, 1992's episode. It might have been a week earlier, but that's the earliest known instance to my knowledge.
One way to close the window in the other direction... do we know the latest episode with whatever graphic package was being used before that? (I think it was plain Helvetica numbers, but don't hold me to that).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FDRfan on July 28, 2022, 08:36:30 PM
I have two more questions about the showcase showdown.

1st. When was the latest they used the money win graphics that resembles the grand game dollar amount?  I remember seeing it just once.

2nd.  When did they stop using the orange outlined pennant-shaped isosceles triangle (That resembles a no passing sign) closeup? 

I'm asking these question to date the possibility of the earliest I watched Price.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on July 28, 2022, 09:51:44 PM
The Grand Game marquee was done away with early in 1987, but in Season 15.  The font remained for some time however.  The split screen for the contestants (assuming that's what you were asking) was retired by Season 25
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on July 29, 2022, 01:51:46 AM
The split screen for the contestants (assuming that's what you were asking) was retired by Season 25
I think he's referring to the original Breslow-era split screen, which was much narrower (and, indeed, "pennant-shaped") than the later Alter-era one (which filled the entire height of the screen). Again, that switched in the fall of 1986.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FDRfan on July 31, 2022, 01:39:17 AM
I noticed wasn't cliffhangers played much in season's 18 and 19 after looking at the stats.  I find that to be odd since Cliffhangers is a popular game next to Plinko.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on August 01, 2022, 02:42:17 PM
Since the rats in Rat Race are selected at random, and we've seen that there's no guarantee that any given rat will finish (or even start), isn't it theoretically possible that all five rats fail to finish the race? If so, does anybody know what would happen in that case?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GR_Man_9009 on August 01, 2022, 04:02:23 PM
Since the rats in Rat Race are selected at random, and we've seen that there's no guarantee that any given rat will finish (or even start), isn't it theoretically possible that all five rats fail to finish the race? If so, does anybody know what would happen in that case?
If it were up to me, it would be in terms of distance.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 01, 2022, 06:40:47 PM
Since the rats in Rat Race are selected at random, and we've seen that there's no guarantee that any given rat will finish (or even start), isn't it theoretically possible that all five rats fail to finish the race? If so, does anybody know what would happen in that case?

I would have to think that if something like that happened, they'd just edit it out and redo the race.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: CaptainPrice on August 01, 2022, 10:54:47 PM
I noticed wasn't cliffhangers played much in season's 18 and 19 after looking at the stats.  I find that to be odd since Cliffhangers is a popular game next to Plinko.

If I had to guess, it's probably the same reason why Magic # was mostly absent in Season 33. Same with Double Prices' record low playings, also in Season 19 - the staff decided it was time for a break. (In Double Price's case, it was probably because of Gallery Game)

This observation I'm making's just speculation, and may not be the reason why both games had abnormally low playings in Season 19.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on August 01, 2022, 11:33:19 PM
I would have to think that if something like that happened, they'd just edit it out and redo the race.

At one point I wondered “what if three of the rats failed to finish, but the contestant picked the two that did? Would the contestant really be happy ‘giving up’ a car and a large prize for a chance at a dinky third prize?”

Scott responded there were “what if” provisions in the Rat Race rules (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,29917.msg466300.html#msg466300) that fairly resolved situations like those, although the specifics were fuzzy.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: FDRfan on August 06, 2022, 04:50:49 AM
This question might be dumb to ask, but I was just wondering when TPIR added those white lights to the colored curtains back in the early 90s.

Personal opinion I thought those  lights didn't mesh well with curtains.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on August 06, 2022, 09:06:54 AM
Actually, TPIR has had several different sets of lights behind the curtains over the years. The first lights were added in January 1985, but were more subtle compared to future iterations. These lights disappeared in late 1987 or early 1988 when the curved curtains (along with an extra ninth green curtain) arrived, but reappeared again in the spring of 1990 with new, brighter white lights. Then came the short-lived silver curtains used for the 25th anniversary, with its own set of lights. Because these extra lights were hot, it was important to turn them off after taping, and when the staff forgot to do so, the curtains got damaged, so the previous curtains returned. As the CBS Eye curtains were being phased out for more curtains (originally red-green-blue-yellow), more lights were added around the audience. When Drew became the host, the curtains/lights were replaced again.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on August 19, 2022, 07:01:00 PM
El Skunko is a colloquial term we use to describe an episode of 'The Price is Right' where none of the pricing games are won and there is a double overbid in the Showcase.

Do partial wins avoid 'El Skunko', even if a partial win is the only pricing game 'win' for an episode? (e.g., someone wins cash instead of the car on Let 'Em Roll, someone takes the prizes instead of going for the car on Temptation, contestant wins the medium prize on Any Number, etc.)



 
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on August 19, 2022, 07:23:27 PM
Do partial wins avoid 'El Skunko', even if a partial win is the only pricing game 'win' for an episode? (e.g., someone wins cash instead of the car on Let 'Em Roll, someone takes the prizes instead of going for the car on Temptation, contestant wins the medium prize on Any Number, etc.)
As far as I'm concerned (and likely in the show's eyes), yes. To whoever's doing the recaps for the Barker Era episodes on the Discord, no.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 19, 2022, 11:04:52 PM
As far as I'm concerned (and likely in the show's eyes), yes.

I don't think the show really pays attention to this -- it's something tracked entirely by the fan community.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on August 20, 2022, 12:50:17 AM
^Maybe not nowadays, but in the Barker Era shows, they did keep a running count of shows where all six games were lost, similar to how they kept track of when all six games were won.

Several episodes have Bob note that there were N number of times a perfect show happened or X number of shows everything was lost going into game six to try to make a win more impactful.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on August 20, 2022, 02:02:10 AM
^Maybe not nowadays, but in the Barker Era shows, they did keep a running count of shows where all six games were lost, similar to how they kept track of when all six games were won.

Several episodes have Bob note that there were N number of times a perfect show happened or X number of shows everything was lost going into game six to try to make a win more impactful.

Do we know how accurate Bob’s declarations were?

If the goal is just to build dramatic tension going into game six, you could accomplish the same thing with either a rough estimate or just pulling a number out of your butt (“we haven’t had six winners from the green podium since 1978”)

It’s not like they expected the fans (pre YouTube, at least) would have detailed enough information about the show to be able to call them out on it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on August 20, 2022, 04:29:12 AM
Do we know how accurate Bob’s declarations were?
Depends on what he was declaring... not sure if I could find it now, but I seem to recall a GSN promo for TPIR that outright called Bob out on a bunkum declaration from him (IIRC it had to do with him claiming that a given episode was the first time he remembered two contestants making the same Showcase bid... with them actually showing a clip from an earlier episode of the same thing happening).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GuyWithFace on August 20, 2022, 10:58:11 AM
I seem to recall a GSN promo for TPIR that outright called Bob out on a bunkum declaration from him (IIRC it had to do with him claiming that a given episode was the first time he remembered two contestants making the same Showcase bid... with them actually showing a clip from an earlier episode of the same thing happening).
This is correct. The clips were from 1982 and 1975 respectively (the recording dates were displayed onscreen), with the latter followed by onscreen text to the effect of "Be careful what you say, Bob... Game Show Network is watching."

I do not know which episode the 1982 clip was from, although I believe the recording date placed it in Season 11. The 1975 clip was from this Season 3 episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7CQN81G0yY&t=19m30s), though contrary to what the promo suggested was itself not the first instance of identical Showcase bids -- and, indeed, GSN would air (or had aired?) earlier instances such as this one from 1972 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvPN5DDKcck&t=19m35s).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on August 20, 2022, 04:05:52 PM

I do not know which episode the 1982 clip was from, although I believe the recording date placed it in Season 11.


Should be from 4631D (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n7dwJj2g2Q). The Barker Era channel has decided to continue to prop up Bob's lie.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 20, 2022, 10:17:02 PM
^Maybe not nowadays, but in the Barker Era shows, they did keep a running count of shows where all six games were lost, similar to how they kept track of when all six games were won.

Yes, but I'm referring specifically to the circumstance of everything on the show being lost except the IUFBs.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GuyWithFace on August 21, 2022, 01:40:18 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I have found the promo. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPgt4nKgGlo&t=17m20s) The recording dates are listed as July 12, 1982 and March 24, 1975, respectively.

Should be from 4631D (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n7dwJj2g2Q).
This is indeed the 1982 episode seen in the promo.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TPIRfan#9821 on August 21, 2022, 03:57:01 PM
Heh, I noted those two exact episodes without ever seeing that bumper in my old drinking game.

(A drink means a sip unless you have to finish it).

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/783063090852921344/787317404153806868/tpirdrinkinggamecombined.png)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SamJ93 on August 22, 2022, 07:20:49 AM
No disrespect intended to your hard work on the meme above, but I never realized how difficult the TPiR logo font is to read in large chunks of text until now...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on August 22, 2022, 09:06:29 AM
No disrespect intended to your hard work on the meme above, but I never realized how difficult the TPiR logo font is to read in large chunks of text until now...
Probably why they changed the closing credits from the logo font to Handel Gothic before the end of September 1972.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on September 13, 2022, 12:16:52 AM
Is there a specific reason why Magic # is always played with a blue carpet in front of the game board?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on September 13, 2022, 07:29:51 PM
I believe it has something to do with the reflectivity of the angled clear acrylic cover (which I think is angled for reasons of the magic floating effect). If there were just a naked floor in the front of the game, the clear acrylic (I don't know whether it's actually Plexiglas®) would reflect white, which would sort of wash out the image inside of the box. The blue carpet is darker, which allows the viewers to see the floating red ring more clearly.

You can see what happens when someone stands in front of the cover in 1446580722009993217[/tweet]]this video (http://[tweet) that the show tweeted (jump to about 2:12).

Magic Number is a more impressive build than it first seems. The floating ring is positioned perfectly so the mirror surrounding the price not only reflects the blue at the top of the box, but if the camera is at enough of an angle, it looks like the seams at the back of the box are visible through the ring (see attached photo). But in practice, the cameras are never positioned in such a way to show off that effect.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Plinkoman on September 13, 2022, 09:39:11 PM
Thank you, Scott! That is awesome! I really hope they don't retire Magic #; and if they update, I hope they keep the floating effect intact. I've always loved the game based on the set alone.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on September 22, 2022, 09:10:17 AM
Not sure if this falls in the category of a "simple" question...but...

Did Kyle Aletter end her relationship with Price on a sour note? I feel as if I read somewhere a long time ago that she was mad she didn't get chosen to be a permanent model and had been always relegated to being a sub only. As much as I liked Gina and Chantel, Kyle would have been a fine choice. She was a great model.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on September 22, 2022, 09:53:48 AM
Kyle was definitely a great model.  While it was great that they added a 4th spot which was clinched by Kathleen, I sorta wished that they had done that in the 1980s.

I can't recall that as being confirmed.  Maybe speculation.

I actually brought this up not to long ago.  Can't remember if I did so on Discord or elsewhere on the boards; I can't blame her for being upset, but I don't think that would've led to a bad breakup.  It's more probable than not that the show is going to go younger over a 35-year old, and even though she wasn't there for long, Chantel, IMO, was the best available & correct hire.  Nikki would follow pretty much immediately to fill the vacancy.  Eventually they trended toward "younger" and from there, it just wasn't happening.  Sure there were issues with Bob and the models, and I don't think Aletter was part of that.  However, as mentioned when I brought this up, she did work with all the past models that did exit on not so good terms.  I guess it was best not to have her on around the beginning of the millennium as part of an audition to fill the void left from Janice & Kathleen.  Not that it's right, but Bob & Roger and whomever else weren't motivated to bringing in someone that was 40 at the time.

At the time, I was thinking they likely weren't going to part with Day One Janice and Kathleen.  It was just a tough break for Kyle that they went back to 3 models.  This after the classic trio stuck together from the late 70s all the way to the early 90s for the most part.

I'm still saddened that she didn't get the job.  Who knows where that would've led to.  I think she definitely would not be on the show today had it worked out, but it would've been awesome to see her as a true permanent Barker Beauty
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on September 22, 2022, 11:02:52 AM
Did Kyle Aletter end her relationship with Price on a sour note? I feel as if I read somewhere a long time ago that she was mad she didn't get chosen to be a permanent model and had been always relegated to being a sub only. As much as I liked Gina and Chantel, Kyle would have been a fine choice. She was a great model.
Kathleen confirms this as true in her book. Apparently on her final run of shows in 1996, Kyle told the staff "if you're not going to make me permanent now, don't call me again when my current deal runs out." (or something to that effect)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: wheelfan1991 on September 22, 2022, 11:19:52 AM
Thank you!! I knew I had read it somewhere; it was indeed Kathleen's book. Which, by the way, is an excellent read if you haven't read it yet.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on September 22, 2022, 11:29:21 AM
Thank you!! I knew I had read it somewhere; it was indeed Kathleen's book. Which, by the way, is an excellent read if you haven't read it yet.

I obviously haven't.  I'm typically not a big fan of autobiographies, but I've heard a ton of great things from Bradley's book.  Too bad about Kyle's run coming to an end due on bad terms but good on her for taking a stand
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on November 10, 2022, 10:49:35 PM
What's the absolute latest a taping has ever had to have been canceled? Have they ever had to cancel a taping day of?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on November 11, 2022, 03:06:36 AM
What's the absolute latest a taping has ever had to have been canceled? Have they ever had to cancel a taping day of?

Throughout the years, tapings have occasionally been cancelled on the day of when the host was sick or otherwise incapacitated.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: actpir on November 26, 2022, 09:29:07 PM
Has TPIR started allowing contestants from outside California to be on the show? If so, have there been any non-California contestants?

I know that the application process is essentially open to everyone, meaning anyone (even those outside California) can apply. Do you think they are willing to let those from outside California come to a taping? 

- actpir
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on November 27, 2022, 12:27:26 PM
Yes. That restriction has been relaxed since Season 50, if not earlier.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: C8 on January 03, 2023, 02:04:39 AM
Sorry if this has been answered here before.

Seeing Rod dressed so sedately and formally on the the ep with him that aired on Pluto last night made me wonder: when did he start wearing the loud colored jackets that became his signature?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on January 05, 2023, 08:06:58 PM
According to the FAQ, it looks like those started in the spring of 1987 (Season 15).  It was only occasional & not permanent
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on April 15, 2023, 02:39:15 AM
Were the million-dollar prizes awarded in the 2008 MDSes lump sums or annuities?

Speaking of the Million Dollar Spectacular, 1/2 Off was one of the million-dollar games. If the contestant won the $25,000, he could risk it to guess which of the 15 remaining boxes contained the $1 million check. My question is, why 15 instead of 16? Drew Carey didn’t really give a substantive explanation on the show as to why.

My guess is that the show didn’t have a second physical copy of Box #12 (the box that contained the $25,000), which is why the million-dollar segment involved only 15 boxes.

EDIT: I think I made an oopsie bumping this thread.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on April 15, 2023, 04:33:49 AM
Not at all, it's designed to be bumped.

Were the million-dollar prizes awarded in the 2008 MDSes lump sums or annuities?

Lump sum. (http://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,5135.msg84831.html#msg84831) I think the source on that was Adam Rose himself.

Speaking of the Million Dollar Spectacular, 1/2 Off was one of the million-dollar games. If the contestant won the $25,000, he could risk it to guess which of the 15 remaining boxes contained the $1 million check. My question is, why 15 instead of 16? Drew Carey didn’t really give a substantive explanation on the show as to why.

My guess is that the show didn’t have a second physical copy of Box #12 (the box that contained the $25,000), which is why the million-dollar segment involved only 15 boxes.

I think you've answered your own question. In order to prevent the $1M check from being revealed during regular gameplay, they had to close the doors and hide the check while the $25K reveal was happening, so they only had 15 boxes to work with.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on April 15, 2023, 03:12:21 PM
Speaking of the Million Dollar Spectacular, 1/2 Off was one of the million-dollar games. If the contestant won the $25,000, he could risk it to guess which of the 15 remaining boxes contained the $1 million check. My question is, why 15 instead of 16?

Because we already knew what was in the 16th box.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GasMoney09721007 on April 20, 2023, 12:36:55 AM
Apologies if this is a dumb question, I've searched the forum and Google and found nothing. Do we have any earthly idea why 5811D never aired? Any prevailing theories?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on April 20, 2023, 01:24:52 AM
Apologies if this is a dumb question, I've searched the forum and Google and found nothing. Do we have any earthly idea why 5811D never aired? Any prevailing theories?

Nope.  It's the only one we have no explanation for.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on April 30, 2023, 02:08:55 AM
I suppose that this question could be applied to literally any game show to ever air since the 1950s, but is there a physical rule book for all of the games on The Price Is Right by which TPTB/Standards & Practices are governed?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SecretChip on May 06, 2023, 06:18:29 AM
Are the $1 bills in Lucky Seven real or props?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on May 06, 2023, 10:32:48 PM
This might be a weird question, but here goes... on the older Showcase podiums (as in, up until they switched to using computer graphics), how would they insert the descriptive nameplates into the podiums? I've never been able to spot a visible seam or slot where they'd slide the card into, so curious.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on May 07, 2023, 02:27:46 AM
Are the $1 bills in Lucky Seven real or props?

Real (at least, they were always real during the time I was there and the years before). During one taping, Roger realized that he didn't have seven one-dollar bills, so he went around asking if anybody had dollar bills he could use for the game. I had two dollars in my wallet that I gave him. Come to think of it, I never got those dollars back...

This might be a weird question, but here goes... on the older Showcase podiums (as in, up until they switched to using computer graphics), how would they insert the descriptive nameplates into the podiums? I've never been able to spot a visible seam or slot where they'd slide the card into, so curious.

When the space for the showcase description was at the top, the slot was along the top of the podium. The cameras usually didn't rise high enough that you could see the tops of the podiums with the slots visible.

When the eggcrate display moved to the top, then the slot was moved to the upstage side of the podium. You couldn't see the slot because the cameras never shot the podiums from the other angle.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: matt mahler on May 08, 2023, 10:30:33 AM
Do they have a recap on 1-5-79 on here? Just curious, because i wanted to see if someone had a perfect show with punch a bunch that they would past 35,000?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: matt mahler on May 08, 2023, 10:32:42 AM
Also, just one more question. Did Monty Hall ever appear? Usually host promoted their shows on Price is right, and I was wondering if he ever promoted the all new beat the clock on there?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on May 08, 2023, 07:28:04 PM
because i wanted to see if someone had a perfect show with punch a bunch that they would past 35,000?

...huh? :confused:
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: mechamind on May 08, 2023, 08:12:37 PM
I actually did a quick run-through about a week ago, and I could not find 1-5-79 in the Barker Era recap section.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: matt mahler on May 09, 2023, 01:41:55 PM
Thank you for at least looking. You see it would have been real coll if the impossible happen. $100 perfect bid, 10,900 on punch a bunch, $11,000 on showdown, and then  the person has a double show case winner.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: matt mahler on May 09, 2023, 01:44:09 PM
Also, what is the earliest price is right episode recap that has the traditional way of playing  punch a bunch?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on May 09, 2023, 02:05:48 PM
Thank you for at least looking. You see it would have been real coll if the impossible happen. $100 perfect bid, 10,900 on punch a bunch, $11,000 on showdown, and then  the person has a double show case winner.

And why would you think that might have happened on that particular episode?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: matt mahler on May 10, 2023, 08:56:08 AM
It's not, obviously. It would be impossible anyhow. I just want to find out, theroritically, what would be the highest amount.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on May 10, 2023, 11:55:28 AM
Well, it's impossible now with no second chance slips.  It was close to impossible, but never a big deal back in the day TBH.

I don't think that longshot needed to happen back in Season 7 to learn the highest amount possible.

To answer the recap question, with the change occurring around the turn of the year from 1978-1979, it would be the first recap that's available after that.  I don't know if the first playing has a recap but the Price Was Right would be your best bet
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SuperMatch93 on May 31, 2023, 10:42:41 AM
What's the smallest non-zero amount someone has won in Time is Money?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on May 31, 2023, 11:26:12 AM
What's the smallest non-zero amount someone has won in Time is Money?

$547
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on May 31, 2023, 03:25:30 PM
Why George "Hi" Mama Mae in every show?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jimmyuTPIR on May 31, 2023, 05:46:13 PM
When does the last episode of the season air?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: TinoStar11 on May 31, 2023, 06:32:50 PM
When does the last episode of the season air?

4th of July is the last new episode of this season
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on May 31, 2023, 07:32:32 PM
Why George "Hi" Mama Mae in every show?

Because she's his mother.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Sotc2022 on May 31, 2023, 07:53:45 PM
Why George "Hi" Mama Mae in every show?

Because he has no other "good lines"?

Seriously.  George was way better on WL as s HOST
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: therealcu2010 on May 31, 2023, 08:19:13 PM
Because he has no other "good lines"?

Seriously.  George was way better on WL as s HOST

Or he just loves his mother and wants to acknowledge her on TV every morning.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Roadgeek Adam on May 31, 2023, 09:14:40 PM
There's no requirement George has to do everything by the book. Fun fact, the show is better when less scripted. Bob's last few years of going through the motions were a stinker. Drew and his background in comedy and improv help enormously on that. George can say hi to his mother if he wants every show.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: alansh42 on June 06, 2023, 10:52:52 AM
Along the lines of the question about real dollar bills in Lucky 7, what about the $500 exact bid bonus? Is it real, and does the contestant get to take it home, versus giving them a check after the show airs?

Inspired by seeing Rachel fanning a bunch of "For Motion Picture Use Only" bills.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on June 06, 2023, 11:56:45 AM
Is it real

Don't know, kinda doubt it, but

does the contestant get to take it home, versus giving them a check after the show airs?

no, all cash prizes are paid by check after the show airs. Even the $100 door prize is payable by check.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on June 06, 2023, 01:56:49 PM
Along the lines of the question about real dollar bills in Lucky 7, what about the $500 exact bid bonus? Is it real, and does the contestant get to take it home, versus giving them a check after the show airs?

I can't speak to recent years, but during all of the Barker seasons (and all of the Carey seasons when I was there), the perfect bid bonus handed to the contestant on camera was real money. As gamesurf said, though, the actual prize was paid by check -- as soon as the pricing game was over, somebody from the staff would collect the money from the contestant so it could be placed back in the host's pocket to be awarded for any subsequent perfect bids.

(Okay, there have been times when a second perfect bid has happened and Bob was caught cashless because no one remembered to get the money back during the commercial. I'm talking about what would usually happen.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on June 06, 2023, 02:07:15 PM
(Okay, there have been times when a second perfect bid has happened and Bob was caught cashless because no one remembered to get the money back during the commercial. I'm talking about what would usually happen.)

Am I imagining things, or did something like this also happen once when there was a perfect bid right before Barker's Marker$?  (Or maybe Shell Game?)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on June 06, 2023, 02:21:58 PM
no, all cash prizes are paid by check after the show airs. Even the $100 door prize is payable by check.

Dang, even the $1-$6 left over from Lucky Seven?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GasMoney09721007 on June 06, 2023, 05:41:54 PM
Am I imagining things, or did something like this also happen once when there was a perfect bid right before Barker's Marker$?  (Or maybe Shell Game?)

I don't know if it ever actually happened but I do remember reading many many years ago, back when Barker's Markers actually existed, that the show only had one set of $500 so if a perfect bid happened right before Barker's Markers, Bob would have to get the money back off-camera before the game started
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: alansh42 on June 06, 2023, 06:30:24 PM
If I got a piggy bank check from Any Number I'd frame it.

Is $1.23 from the piggy the smallest possible on stage win? From the Time Is Money discussion it sounds like it goes down in increments too big for it to stop on $1. (I assume no leading zero.)
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: blozier2006 on June 06, 2023, 07:10:06 PM
Is $1.23 from the piggy the smallest possible on stage win? From the Time Is Money discussion it sounds like it goes down in increments too big for it to stop on $1. (I assume no leading zero.)
AFAIK the smallest possible thing for the piggy bank would be $1.02... though I can't prove that's ever actually happened.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: LiteBulb88 on June 06, 2023, 07:14:59 PM
Have they ever stated the first digit of the piggy bank can't be 0? If not, then the smallest amount possible is $0.12. That'd be awfully mean, but not against the rules to my knowledge.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: COINBOYNYC on June 07, 2023, 08:18:54 PM
Have they ever stated the first digit of the piggy bank can't be 0? If not, then the smallest amount possible is $0.12. That'd be awfully mean, but not against the rules to my knowledge.

Roger was once asked on Facebook if the amount in the piggy bank was ever at minimum ($0.12) or maximum ($9.87).  This was his answer:


"We never had an amount that was less than $1.00...our policy was never to look cheap and any amount low like that would have made us look bad. I do not have the records or the absolute recollection but I am sure we had $9.87 at least once in the piggy bank. Kathy Greco, who used to devise the amounts, usually always kept the amount as high as possible with the numbers she had to work with."
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Renny on June 13, 2023, 02:01:48 AM
Have they ever stated the first digit of the piggy bank can't be 0? If not, then the smallest amount possible is $0.12. That'd be awfully mean, but not against the rules to my knowledge.

Roger was once asked on Facebook if the amount in the piggy bank was ever at minimum ($0.12) or maximum ($9.87).  This was his answer:


"We never had an amount that was less than $1.00...our policy was never to look cheap and any amount low like that would have made us look bad. I do not have the records or the absolute recollection but I am sure we had $9.87 at least once in the piggy bank. Kathy Greco, who used to devise the amounts, usually always kept the amount as high as possible with the numbers she had to work with."

The smallest amount for the piggy bank I can recall is $1.09, from the very first episode.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on July 09, 2023, 12:33:46 AM
Has the production company plug during the credits always been pre-taped? I know (well, I assume since it sounds exactly the same each day) that it’s pre-recorded. I’m imagining they don’t have the announcer show up on the screen during the credits until after the plug happens as an illusion that it’s done live every time.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on July 09, 2023, 01:09:56 AM
Has the production company plug during the credits always been pre-taped?

It was done live during the Barker era. I know it was still being done live at the beginning of Drew's run (I specifically remember being disappointed the first time I heard "FremantleMedia" instead of "Mark Goodson" under the audience applause), but I don't know when the switch to prerecording it occurred. My guess is that it came about when the show stopped trying to shoot live to tape. I don't know whether that happened while Rich was still the announcer or whether the announcer auditions may have prompted prerecording the announcement.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Nick on July 09, 2023, 03:29:32 PM
Four questions:

First, in the nonsense that happened around the turn of season 36 or 37 when the powers-that-were were very keen to disassociate themselves from the good ol' Price, I seem to recall something about the words "A Mark Goodson Production" being cut off the processing numbers worn by those outside in line.  I want to say there was a story reported here about pages walking the line and literally cutting the words off the bottom of the numbers that were already given out one day during audience processing.  Is this a figment of my imagination, or did that really happen?

Second, I also seem to recall it being said years ago that the CBS affiliate in St. Louis, MO, KMOV, was airing a day behind the rest of the network, something that I recall reading was going on for years until they eventually caught up and starting airing the same day's episode as everyone else.  Does anyone know more about this and how long it lasted, and why this was even a thing?  In the years before Innertube, did we have nobody around here who could have easily helped us out for pre-emptions if they were airing a day behind?

Third, what was the true story behind the shtick of Rod billing himself as "the official ambassador of Chaing Mai"?  His profile on the show's website even stated this.  I find it highly unlikely that some radio announcer moved to TV was carrying out official ambassadorial duties for a single city in a foreign country.  It's the use of the word official that's always struck me strange with this.  Anybody know more?

Fourth, Rod's CBS.com profile also used to say he hosted something called "the live $25,000 Game Show" at the Roy Clark Theater in Branson, MO.  I've never seen any details on what this show was, which I am assuming was along the lines of the various game show stage show adaptations that Fremantle, Bob Eubanks and others have done with more recognition since.  Anybody have any details?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on July 10, 2023, 12:45:38 PM
It was done live during the Barker era. I know it was still being done live at the beginning of Drew's run (I specifically remember being disappointed the first time I heard "FremantleMedia" instead of "Mark Goodson" under the audience applause), but I don't know when the switch to prerecording it occurred. My guess is that it came about when the show stopped trying to shoot live to tape. I don't know whether that happened while Rich was still the announcer or whether the announcer auditions may have prompted prerecording the announcement.

During Rod's first several months, his sign-off wasn't as drawn out as it was for most of the run ("This is Rod Roddy speaking" instead of "This... is Rodddddd Roddy (pause) speaking". )

Wheel and Jeopardy! were known to be using pre-taped signoffs much earlier, and of course dropped its signoffs altogether, although Jeopardy!'s "Tomorrow on Jeopardy!..." plugs sort of brings back some semblance, even if it doesn't involve Johnny Gilbert himself signing off or mentioning that the show was created by Merv Griffin. Its still remarkable that TPIR is still even doing such a signoff nowadays, being the last remaining game show to do so, when most others dropped theirs 20+ years ago, with the most recent Goodson/Freemantle show to do so being Family Feud in 2002.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on July 10, 2023, 12:50:55 PM
During Rod's first several months, his sign-off wasn't as drawn out as it was for most of the run ("This is Rod Roddy speaking" instead of "This... is Rodddddd Roddy (pause) speaking". )

Considering he drew out his sign-off on Press Your Luck, I'm surprised that he didn't initially carry it over to Price.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jimmyuTPIR on July 25, 2023, 05:08:46 PM
Season 51 still has two unaired episodes. Is it common for those episodes never to air or will they eventually air?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: GameShowFan1987 on July 25, 2023, 07:34:19 PM
They'll eventually air. Probably near the end of the summer.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on July 25, 2023, 10:20:19 PM
Season 51 still has two unaired episodes. Is it common for those episodes never to air or will they eventually air?

There's a few shows that have been pulled because of especially large screw-ups, but they've always been replaced with new episodes that were done solely to replace them in the air schedule.  The only show that's ever been skipped entirely is a half-hour episode from early in Season 7 -- because the other program that occasionally interfered with Price's timeslot stopped doing so, they basically ended up not needing it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on August 13, 2023, 02:55:26 AM
When was debut the freeze frame moment after the contestant win the Prize Game?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gsn93 on August 13, 2023, 05:04:21 AM
When was debut the freeze frame moment after the contestant win the Prize Game?

It debut shortly after 5661D in March-April 1985. I don't recall the exact episode off hand. Seems like master control over in Television City was upgraded around this time with the ability to do digital effects (transitional wipes, the flipping opening titles, and still store freeze frame, etc).
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: DYC on August 13, 2023, 03:54:58 PM
I’m sure the Plinko Sign was manually operated, but was there a stagehand *inside* of the prop every time? I recall the pictures of it when it was up for auction, and there was one angle with a big hole in the side and I could never figure out what that was

Apologies I don’t know how to imbed photos but here’s the thread I’m referring to (3rd picture)

https://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,34116.0.html
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Nick on August 13, 2023, 04:20:41 PM
What you're looking at is the lever a stagehand would pull to flip the slats in the sign from the name side to the prize-amount side.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: alansh42 on August 14, 2023, 03:16:58 PM
Four questions:

Second, I also seem to recall it being said years ago that the CBS affiliate in St. Louis, MO, KMOV, was airing a day behind the rest of the network, something that I recall reading was going on for years until they eventually caught up and starting airing the same day's episode as everyone else.  Does anyone know more about this and how long it lasted, and why this was even a thing?  In the years before Innertube, did we have nobody around here who could have easily helped us out for pre-emptions if they were airing a day behind?
I wonder if they were airing it in a time slot before the network feed went out. If they did, they would have to tape it and show it the next day.

Here in the mountain time zone we always had weirdness with the network schedules because everything was taped delayed an hour. Live events would mean they didn't get the tape for later, so the later show would be preempted too.

I have no idea how it works now. There may not even be a "feed" for non-live programming. Maybe the affiliates just download TPiR from CBS as a video file.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 14, 2023, 07:06:47 PM
Here in the mountain time zone we always had weirdness with the network schedules because everything was taped delayed an hour. Live events would mean they didn't get the tape for later, so the later show would be preempted too.

I have no idea how it works now. There may not even be a "feed" for non-live programming. Maybe the affiliates just download TPiR from CBS as a video file.

As far as I know, CBS generally sends out one feed for the East Coast (Eastern and Central) and another for the West Coast (Pacific).  Mountain stations generally record the East Coast feed and play it back on an hour delay, but if there's a pre-emption during it, the network will send out an extra feed for them.  The daily feeds also include Let's Make a Deal* twice -- once before The Price Is Right, and again after The Talk.

*God, I still default to invoking Guiding Light for this explanation.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on August 15, 2023, 03:19:47 AM
It debut shortly after 5661D in March-April 1985. I don't recall the exact episode off hand. Seems like master control over in Television City was upgraded around this time with the ability to do digital effects (transitional wipes, the flipping opening titles, and still store freeze frame, etc).

Thanks! There is something note on the FAQ? I don't find nothing...
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: pannoni1 on August 15, 2023, 07:16:32 AM
^

The debut of the "freeze frame" shot commonly used heading into a commercial break was for a playing of On The Nose on April 26, 1985 (5705D). Two other game shows (Wheel of Fortune and $ale of the Century) also introduced some upgraded digital effects in the  early months of 1985. Super Password was the first Mark Goodson show to introduce these early digital graphics, most notably on the Passwords themselves, the Super Password round graphics/timer, and the MGP logo.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Axl on August 16, 2023, 03:55:09 PM
As far as I know, CBS generally sends out one feed for the East Coast (Eastern and Central) and another for the West Coast (Pacific).  Mountain stations generally record the East Coast feed and play it back on an hour delay, but if there's a pre-emption during it, the network will send out an extra feed for them.

This is correct. The one odd quirk is that the West Coast feed schedule for most network shows has them start at the same local time in the Eastern and Pacific Time Zones. But the East Coast feed for Price is at 11am ET, while the West Coast feed is 10am PT. I don't know why it airs at 11:00 in New York and 10:00 in LA, but it's been that way as long as I can remember.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on August 17, 2023, 02:01:49 AM
^

The debut of the "freeze frame" shot commonly used heading into a commercial break was for a playing of On The Nose on April 26, 1985 (5705D). Two other game shows (Wheel of Fortune and $ale of the Century) also introduced some upgraded digital effects in the  early months of 1985. Super Password was the first Mark Goodson show to introduce these early digital graphics, most notably on the Passwords themselves, the Super Password round graphics/timer, and the MGP logo.


Thanks! Do you know the date of last time?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SeaBreeze341 on August 17, 2023, 11:45:46 PM
IIRC, I think those were all but eliminated by the early part of the millennium.  They may have been done away with around Season 30; I really only recall those used during decent moments following a playing of Plinko
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jhc2010 on August 18, 2023, 02:47:02 AM
IIRC, I think those were all but eliminated by the early part of the millennium.  They may have been done away with around Season 30; I really only recall those used during decent moments following a playing of Plinko
The last instance of the freeze frames leading into commercial that I’m aware of was on the season 42 Valentine's Day episode, after Secret "X," as evidenced here (about 3:36):
There was a thread about the still reaction shots a few years ago. There’s some interesting info in this thread including a taping where Roger promised the audience that he’d bring the still shots back, and he followed through. Link: https://www.golden-road.net/index.php/topic,29709.0.html
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Counterpoint on August 26, 2023, 09:28:34 AM
Is there a person on stage behind the scale who manually runs the Balance Game?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on August 26, 2023, 01:58:39 PM
Is there a person on stage behind the scale who manually runs the Balance Game?

Yes.  I'm not sure exactly how they run it, but the game definitely doesn't behave like an actual scale.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on August 26, 2023, 03:34:09 PM
There are a couple of pictures in the gallery that demonstrate how it works. Here (http://www.golden-road.net/gg/displayimage.php?album=1&pid=62#top_display_media)'s the back of the game in its "balanced" position. When the handle is pivoted (http://www.golden-road.net/gg/displayimage.php?album=1&pid=63#top_display_media), the horizontal beam tilts in one direction or the other. The challenge for the stagehand is to pivot the handle back and forth quickly enough to be somewhat realistic and exciting, but not so quickly that the "pans" swing too far and smack into the vertical pillar in the center.

I don't remember whether I've mentioned this before: in the first picture, see that empty rectangle above the handle? The one that looks like it could fit a four-digit display? When the game was built, that's where the price readout was. Then they discovered that when the scale was unbalanced, the beam either partially blocked or was too close to the display, so the display was moved to one of the tables.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on August 30, 2023, 09:57:34 PM
I haven't been able to watch the show on TV for a while, only catching it on Paramount+. Curious how, when they air the episodes in prime time (such as the farewell to studio 33 show) then air it again in daytime, do they deal with the different commercial format of daytime vs. prime time?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on August 30, 2023, 10:25:31 PM
When the daytime farewell to Studio 33 episode aired in primetime a while ago it was the regular episode and the commercial breaks were padded to fill the extra time. I don't think we've seen them take a primetime show and air it in the daytime slot. I imagine since it's a "special" they just won't adjust it and eat the however extra minutes of commercials if possible.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: thatvhstapeguy on September 04, 2023, 03:36:35 PM
How were the set alterations (i.e. the Turntable and Doors) handled for MDSs? That seems to me like a lot of painting to do and undo. Did they replace the panels?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on September 04, 2023, 04:33:16 PM
How were the set alterations (i.e. the Turntable and Doors) handled for MDSs? That seems to me like a lot of painting to do and undo. Did they replace the panels?

I think that's what happened with the Big Doors.  I know it's what they did for the Turntable.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on September 04, 2023, 09:25:32 PM
The National Archives of Game Show History holds the purple Barker MDS door panels in storage. They were replacement panels that could be swapped out at will.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gsn93 on September 05, 2023, 05:38:52 AM
It appears that the actual door panels were different from the normal daytime set. I noticed with the Million Dollar Spectacular doors that the casters at the bottom were missing on some of the panels. It creates a gap between the panel and the floor. It's noticeable here with doors one and two (https://youtu.be/PzbGrDNpCG4?t=319). It's like that on every one of the Barker MDS. The daytime door panels didn't have that problem.

The designs were a cover that attached to the panels. The season 35 doors that popped up for auction a few months back confirms that. So they didn't need to repaint them over and over again. They would only had to replace the individual panels when they had a different theme show to include the banner graphic.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: iluvpir on September 05, 2023, 10:54:21 AM
It makes me wonder; what design is under the 35 years covers on the panels that were auctioned off? Could it be the starburst design from 31-34?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on September 19, 2023, 05:41:11 AM
All Episode in Prime Time of Season 51 was aired at 8pm?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on September 19, 2023, 09:34:52 PM
The 50th anniversary special aired at 9pm, otherwise yes I believe all the At Night episodes in season 51 aired at 8.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on September 19, 2023, 10:24:19 PM
The 50th anniversary special aired at 9pm

Forgive me if I'm forgetting something, but wasn't that in Season 50?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: bonkers77 on September 20, 2023, 04:14:01 AM
The 50th anniversary special aired at 9pm, otherwise yes I believe all the At Night episodes in season 51 aired at 8.

Thank you! In my archive I wrote 8.PM for 50th Special. I Correct it.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: penny_ante on September 21, 2023, 01:28:57 PM
Sorry in advance if this is the wrong place for the question or if it's already been answered.

When do the streaming versions of the show appear online?

I'm not getting good reception on my antenna, so I'm missing over the air broadcasts. Until I fix that, I've been expecting to see streaming versions of the show on Paramount+ and/or CBS.com on the evenings of the days they've aired, but no dice. What's the usual cycle?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: SteveGavazzi on September 21, 2023, 01:52:21 PM
When do the streaming versions of the show appear online?

I'm not getting good reception on my antenna, so I'm missing over the air broadcasts. Until I fix that, I've been expecting to see streaming versions of the show on Paramount+ and/or CBS.com on the evenings of the days they've aired, but no dice. What's the usual cycle?

CBS.com only uploads new episodes.  Once they're there, they stay for the rest of the season, but they always get pulled shortly before the next season premiere, and unfortunately, we hit that point with Season 51 a couple of days ago.

Don't worry -- once the new shows start airing, they'll start getting uploaded again around 6:00 P.M. Eastern the day of broadcast.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: JayC on September 21, 2023, 10:39:56 PM
Forgive me if I'm forgetting something, but wasn't that in Season 50?
My bad, the 50th anniversary special popped in my head as a primetime episode that premiered at a time other than 8, but of course that was 50 not 51.

Thank you! In my archive I wrote 8.PM for 50th Special. I Correct it.
So I did help you at least, even if it wasn't actually what you were really asking for!

Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: iluvpir on September 22, 2023, 07:17:42 PM
How many DSW's were there in Season 51?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: gamesurf on September 22, 2023, 07:38:57 PM
Five.

tpirstats (http://tpirstats.com/Season51/Stats.htm) is a great resource for general stats questions like these.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: penny_ante on September 28, 2023, 01:40:58 PM
CBS.com only uploads new episodes.  Once they're there, they stay for the rest of the season, but they always get pulled shortly before the next season premiere, and unfortunately, we hit that point with Season 51 a couple of days ago.

Don't worry -- once the new shows start airing, they'll start getting uploaded again around 6:00 P.M. Eastern the day of broadcast.

Thanks for your answer, Steve. I was looking at a schedule that suggested the season started on the 19th and worried that I'd missed the premiere. Glad I didn't miss it!
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: jimmyuTPIR on October 01, 2023, 10:22:16 AM
I have a question about the 10 year rule. Does it apply to the contestants who only make it to Bidder’s Row and don’t get to play a pricing game or just to those who play a pricing game?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Thatgameshowguy on October 01, 2023, 11:07:49 AM
The 10 year rule applies if you get called down.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on March 08, 2024, 11:33:41 AM
Apart from the Mighty Sound Effects Lady on One Away, are the sound effects on the show actually controlled by humans, or are they automated (like “programmed” into the games)?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: MSTieScott on March 08, 2024, 02:13:40 PM
Apart from the Mighty Sound Effects Lady on One Away, are the sound effects on the show actually controlled by humans, or are they automated (like “programmed” into the games)?

During the Barker years, the sound effects were always activated by a person trying to play the sound effect at the same moment a number appeared or a flap opened.

Now that the pricing games are controlled by one computer, when sound effects can be built in, they are. For example, when Double Cross is lost, the computer is programmed to play the buzzer at the same time the board turns red. Or play the bells at the same time the winning animation is activated.

But there are a lot of moments on the show that aren't computer controlled. For example, in Temptation, a number appearing in the contestant's bid can be tied to a bell, but the panels that drop to reveal the actual price aren't connected to anything electronic, so those bells/buzzers have to be sounded the old-fashioned way (or rather, in the style of the old-fashioned way by clicking a button in the computer program to simply play a bell or buzzer sound). When somebody reveals a price in Most Expensive or One Wrong Price, the accompanying ding or buzz has to be manually sounded (but I wouldn't be surprised if the multiple bells that sound on a win are tied to the activation of the flashing lights). And games like Money Game and Double Prices don't have any electronic components whatsoever.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: htmlcc92 on March 08, 2024, 02:17:16 PM
I seem to recall a handful of seasons ago a contestant played the Dice Game and automatically won due to correct numbers and 1s or 6s. The dings went off and the theme started playing. After the contestant ran off, Drew pointed at each number to reveal it and with it was accompanied with a ding for each one. Then after the last digit was revealed multiple dings played again. I think that must have been a logic problem when programming it to do automatic sound effects. I haven’t noticed it happen again like that since then, so don’t know if they re-programmed it or changed it to manual sound?
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: C8 on March 12, 2024, 11:52:05 AM
When clothes are offered on the show, does the contestant get to pick the size of said clothing before they receive the prize or are they provided as shown on the show? Always wondered that.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: b_masters8 on March 18, 2024, 06:36:18 AM
Now that the pricing games are controlled by one computer, when sound effects can be built in, they are. For example, when Double Cross is lost, the computer is programmed to play the buzzer at the same time the board turns red. Or play the bells at the same time the winning animation is activated.

The same w/Card Game as it is now-- the foghorn sounds if the screen turns red for a loss, and the bells play (in addition to a Vegas-style winning sound) if the screen is green for a win.

Or on Check Game-- if the total (check and prize) is out of the range, the screens turn red w/the buzzer (and the check is voided), but if the total is in range, the screens flash green and have a snazzy animation.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: Axl on April 09, 2024, 12:41:58 PM
Now that the pricing games are controlled by one computer, when sound effects can be built in, they are. For example, when Double Cross is lost, the computer is programmed to play the buzzer at the same time the board turns red. Or play the bells at the same time the winning animation is activated.

Do you know how the Time Is Money button works now? It appears to be wired and functional in some way. I assume it's initially set up to just buzz, and then when the contestant gets the right arrangement, something is triggered offstage to change its functionality to "win" the next time it's pressed. If so, I've wondered what they would do if a contestant were so fast or slipshod on the placement of the grocery items that the operator did not change the button over before it was pressed.
Title: Re: Simple Questions & Answers Thread
Post by: ooboh on April 09, 2024, 01:50:46 PM
Do you know how the Time Is Money button works now? It appears to be wired and functional in some way. I assume it's initially set up to just buzz, and then when the contestant gets the right arrangement, something is triggered offstage to change its functionality to "win" the next time it's pressed. If so, I've wondered what they would do if a contestant were so fast or slipshod on the placement of the grocery items that the operator did not change the button over before it was pressed.

Funnily enough, I recall the exact opposite scenario happening a few years ago. The contestant initially had the right configuration but changed one of the items at the last moment; however, the clock stopped as if the contestant was correct. If your assumption is correct, then the operator was unable to switch the button from "right" to "wrong," resulting in a win when there wasn't.