I know this topic has been banished to another, rather mockingly-titled and/or marginalizing thread, but facts are facts and this needs to be cleared up, IMO, in the same place where the false information appeared. So if these are unfounded and/or borderline-offensive allegations, their original source is none other than Mr. Bob Barker. And that's a fact.
Do we really need to go through the whole allegations-are-not-facts discussion again? Allegations went back and forth like canon shells (remind anyone of any recent threads on a particular gameshow fan site?), and I doubt half of them are true.
pleenko, I appreciate you bringing that information to everyone's attention, that's something I didn't know. The fact that these allegations came from Bob, knowing everything else that happened around that time, makes me ask myself one question: are the allegations true or is this merely a "he's a dirtier old man than me" defense? (I'm being serious, did that go to trial or was it just a onetime press affair?)