Author Topic: Hollywood Squares 2025  (Read 4632 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AussieEvil

  • Walking the Golden Road
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
  • Not Hurt By Pain™
Hollywood Squares 2025
« on: January 19, 2025, 10:40:01 PM »
After the NFL games, Hollywood Squares started with a twofer. After watching the first episode, without spoiling too much:

  • It seems to be going for the retro set design (like Password). Lots of wood.
  • It's going for a revival of the Marshall look and feel. Theme song's a rearrangement of the Marshall version.
  • I don't know if it's commercials taking more time or more chat, but it seems like there's not enough game time.
  • Doesn't seem to be a lot of zingers...?
  • Title is bland-looking

Although I'd really like it to be a good show, I'd be surprised if it got renewed for a second season, sadly...
"Fans are clingy complaining dipshits who will never ever be grateful for any concession you make. The moment you shut out their shrill, tremulous voices the happier you will be for it."

Offline htmlcc92

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1266
  • "Mrs. Peacock was a man?!"
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2025, 11:34:19 PM »
I haven't watched it yet, but did hear some clips here and there - did I hear them announce it as from "Television City in Hollywood?" I thought Television City was being revamped? What studio is it taping in, does anyone know?
There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Twilight Zone.

Offline GameShowFan1987

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1824
  • The Bob
    • The New Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2025, 11:57:22 PM »
Allow me to break down my feelings about this one.

Likes:
- The throwback theme song is nice nod to the original Marshall run.
- The set has a nice aesthetic to it. A nice blend of old and new.
- The questions aren't unnecessarily filthy which is something they could have easily done.
- There were some genuinely funny moments that happened in the first two episodes.

Neutral:
- Nate Burleson is okay as host but nothing to write home about. If this show lasts, I think he'll find his groove.
- Having one of the stars serve as announcer at the top of the show is kind of cool but I feel the show needs an actual announcer for reasons I'll get to later.
- The stars ranged from "Oh hey, I know that person!" to "Who dat?" This might just be a 'me' problem though.
- The bonus round is a reworking of the Bergeron version. It ditches the keys in favor of the stars you've correctly answered questions about revealing whether or not they have the prize money one by one. This isn't a terrible update but I feel like it just needs something more.

Dislikes:
- You only get in about 1 and a half rounds per show. I'm not sure if it's a case of too much ad time or if bad pacing is to blame but it definitely leaves me wanting more.
- The stars barely give zingers. There were some good ones, but most of the time they just jump straight to giving an answer making for a pretty bland exchange.
- Drew Barrymore just doesn't work as the center square. I get she's also executive producer, but Whoopi Goldberg she is not. She's just not all that funny.
- I also don't understand why it's her job to reveal the secret square prize. Is she supposed to be something of a co-host or the announcer? The show could really use a proper announcer.

All in all I really don't see this show lasting without making some changes.  That said, please feel free to disagree with me as these are simply my opinions and I'm not trying to sway anybody. If you feel differently about any of the things I mentioned, I can respect that.

The actual retail price is...

Offline illustriousrocket

  • In Contestant's Row
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2025, 08:34:51 PM »
Overall, I liked it. They did a better job of incorporating schtick over quick zingers than the last time a Squares revival tried it (MG/HS) so it doesn't as directionless and meandering. The first half of the hour did go a little *too* slowly but the second half felt more substantial. I think they'll figure out a good balance as they settle in. The schtick doesn't bother me because it meshes well with this environment; I'd contrast that against Jimmy Fallon's antics on Password, which got so bad they drove me to stop watching.

Nate Burleson is an okay host. If the goal of the show is to have the celebrities messing around with the game as a secondary thing, he manages that fairly well. He doesn't come across as obviously overwhelmed as Jon Bauman did - I know that's damning him with faint praise, but he works.

Drew Barrymore's role is indeed a little confusing. They seem to be doing something similar to when the John Davidson version would put Shadoe Stevens in a square, but I don't understand why they have a guest celebrity do the intro only for Drew to do everything else the announcer would typically do.

Audio/visuals are pretty much flawless for me. The return of the classic Marshall theme was an absolute surprise of the best kind.

Overall I think I grade it a solid B. It looks and sounds great, has a capable host, and is enjoyable as a sort of "celebrities hanging out and casually playing a game at a party" type of show. It could stand to figure out exactly how much gameplay it wants to balance with the schtick, and have a clearer idea of what role it wants Drew Barrymore to have.

Offline ooboh

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1065
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2025, 09:45:52 PM »
Overall, I liked it. They did a better job of incorporating schtick over quick zingers than the last time a Squares revival tried it (MG/HS) so it doesn't as directionless and meandering. The first half of the hour did go a little *too* slowly but the second half felt more substantial. I think they'll figure out a good balance as they settle in. The schtick doesn't bother me because it meshes well with this environment; I'd contrast that against Jimmy Fallon's antics on Password, which got so bad they drove me to stop watching.

Re: Password. Keke Palmer is a perfectly fine host, but Jimmy Fallon is such an obnoxious twit that I cannot sit through an episode. It's a shame that he's one of the executive producers.

Regarding Hollywood Squares, it certainly wasn't terrible, but the pace could be just a little faster. I appreciate the fact that they maintained the Secret Square for this version. I'm also not a proponent of an all-or-nothing bonus round. Its underlying structure is fine, but I'd make two changes.

  • Reduce the time limit from 60 seconds to 45 seconds. It doesn't feel like a speed round when a contestant can deliberate for up to five seconds on a question. The shorter time limit would force contestants to make quicker decisions.
  • I would include "second-place" and "third-place" prizes of $10,000 and $5,000, respectively, with the contestant getting the largest of the three values if any appear. It feels weird for a contestant to lose in the bonus round and only have $3,000 or so to show for all that work, especially for a primetime game show.

Except for Pyramid, I'm generally not a fan of celebrity-driven game shows, so I'd have to give this one a pass, but it's not something that I'd be scrambling to change the channel away from if it showed up on my screen.
"YOU'VE USED THE ONE TWICE, JOY!"

Offline illustriousrocket

  • In Contestant's Row
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2025, 08:02:43 PM »
Quote
Re: Password. Keke Palmer is a perfectly fine host, but Jimmy Fallon is such an obnoxious twit that I cannot sit through an episode. It's a shame that he's one of the executive producers.

I'm in absolute agreement. I didn't even dislike him prior to Password. It's just... he was so out of control that it was unbearable. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more instances of him acting like a sore loser after I finally gave up, either.

Re: the Hollywood Squares bonus money: I see where you're coming from. I was expecting the bonus game to actually be the contestant choosing a square from the ones they won and receiving whatever was in that star's envelope.

Offline AussieEvil

  • Walking the Golden Road
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
  • Not Hurt By Pain™
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2025, 12:59:41 AM »
Re: the Hollywood Squares bonus money: I see where you're coming from. I was expecting the bonus game to actually be the contestant choosing a square from the ones they won and receiving whatever was in that star's envelope.

That's what I was thinking too. The Bergeron show did that bonus format at the end of one of the tournament weeks IIRC?
"Fans are clingy complaining dipshits who will never ever be grateful for any concession you make. The moment you shut out their shrill, tremulous voices the happier you will be for it."

Online gamesurf

  • 4/4/2023
  • Director
  • *******
  • Posts: 1571
  • Everyone has a plan til ya get punched in the face
    • Golden-Gallery.net
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2025, 08:59:58 AM »
  • Reduce the time limit from 60 seconds to 45 seconds. It doesn't feel like a speed round when a contestant can deliberate for up to five seconds on a question. The shorter time limit would force contestants to make quicker decisions.

I assume the longer time limit is because they want to make sure all of the celebs they’re paying for get spotlighted in the bonus round & they no longer have five chances a week to make up for a bad playing.

I still think the bonus round is missing something… it’s over too quickly, it doesn’t matter very much whether a contestant gets 7 right v 8 right so there isn’t much tension building, and it feels cheap for a contestant to fail to win the big prize and walk away with $3,500.

Tris brought up the Hip Hop Squares “pick three stars in a row, win three prizes” bonus round and came up with the idea of putting smaller prizes in each star’s envelope with a grand lump sum in one special envelope. I suggested they rip off GRECO and play for $10,000 per three-in-a-row formed in 60 seconds, with the question order spiraling around the board saving Drew Barrymore for last for maximum effect.
Quote from: Bill Todman
"The sign of a good game, is when you don't have to explain it every day. The key is not simplicity, but apparent simplicity. Password looks like any idiot could have made it up, but we have 14 of our people working on that show. There is a great complexity behind the screen. It requires great work to keep it simple."

https://golden-gallery.net

Offline Reloaden

  • Taking a Bonus Spin
  • *****
  • Posts: 869
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2025, 01:06:54 PM »
The show drags... moves so slowly, Nate doesn't do it for me as host, and everything looks forced.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2025, 10:41:25 PM by Reloaden »

Offline Ccook

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 5158
  • 69 years of The Price Is Right
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2025, 03:17:03 PM »
CBS will air encore eps of Squares next week at 2 PM ET, temporarily interrupting the TPIR repeats.
"Be yourself. Everyone else is taken."
--Oscar Wilde

Offline SeaBreeze341

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 2469
  • Everyone knows the damn thing's not there!
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2025, 11:42:21 PM »
Although I get content due to my settings for what I record, this is nice.  As mentioned elsewhere, not everyone gets the chance to watch the show at night
"Times change; people change" -- Casey Affleck

Offline jhc2010

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2025, 03:23:42 PM »
I haven't watched it yet, but did hear some clips here and there - did I hear them announce it as from "Television City in Hollywood?" I thought Television City was being revamped? What studio is it taping in, does anyone know?
Hollywood Squares is indeed at Television City. Press Your Luck is also back taping at Television City.

Offline Briguy

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 1779
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2025, 10:29:31 AM »
Aside from Rita Moreno, a clip of which has aired on video sharing services, which other original Marshall-era celebrities are confirmed to take their place in one of the squares? I don't think any shows Rita was on were rerun on GSN, JFTR, so that'd likely make her either pre-syndication or the block of syndicated episodes originally aired between very early 1973 and spring 1975.

I could picture Sally Field, who would be the last surviving celebrity from the very first week of the NBC daytime show back in October 1966, perhaps being asked.

Brian

Offline jhc2010

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2025, 09:43:41 PM »
Why does Nate Burleson feel the need to say "here we go" before asking nearly every question. If it was a drinking game to drink every time Nate said those words, most people would be blacked out before the second commercial break.

Offline jhc2010

  • Double Showcase Winner
  • ******
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Hollywood Squares 2025
« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2025, 09:54:29 PM »
The show could really use a proper announcer.
Does the show actually have an announcer? Who provides the secret square trip description when it is won? It doesn't sound like Drew Barrymore.