sorry for the nearly 24 hour delay. my editor took a while.(I actually had everything finished by 1250am but my dad wasn't going to edit at that time) this has to do with Thursday not Friday, since the highlights coming out at 11pm anyway meaning nothing is getting posted until after the highlights. I will focus mostly on the CBS highlight recording. I watched a little of it at approximately 5:20pm. I admire that, at least, they have the usual announcers, but some of the cuts are a bit strange, in that a good amount of time the camera panned in on a still azalea bush. I think trying to move the cameras around, even if it looks a tad bit sloppier, one may actually see more of the action shots in the long run, including the balls going bouncing on the green. Granted, unlike CBS, this is their first year, and hopefully, overtime they will reconsider showing entire minutes, versus mere seconds, of azalea bushes as broadcasting content. However, I do appreciate the bigger print that they put for the scoreboard on the corner of the screen. Yet, I question why, in a category named “featured group,” we have someone I have never heard of – Gotterup. I stopped watching at approximately 5:30pm and the rest of this post is focused based on the highlight video.
It has occurred to me that between this year and last we should at least keep in mind that production turn-around is a mere 3-5 hours. Thus, the fact viewers even had a chance to see anything on the matter seems miraculous given the extremely quick production for these recaps. While I still review as harshly as I usually do, and note that with such a quick turn-around mistakes will be made in production, I certainly appreciate the massive amount of work put into the production itself to allow views by the public.
There is little fondness, for me, with broadcasters talking about 2022 since that was the first Masters I watched and the one that began this tradition of making these posts annually. Despite my prior posts mostly complaining about, rather than analysing the game – that is done currently - everyone has been talking about how the course is dry, and I'm happy they began by summarising that for the people who purely watch CBS. However, how much the average viewer cares about how the course feels is up for debate.
Starting with Scotty Scheffler is always a great way to start. Yet, I feel that showing only one hit per player is a bit of a disservice particularly for the likes of Justin Rose and Scotty. But, Kurt Kitayama getting a lot of birdies was a highlight worth mentioning. I have been thinking about Justin Day - when I was going to make a “beginners guide” on YouTube, perhaps,(as of Saturday I don't think this is happening, I am much better at talking after the fact that to make stuff for before the fact) talking about each player and why you should care about them. While it may sound harsh, the best I can come up with on Justin Day is he appears a lot but does not do a lot. I understand it takes a lot to even get on that course, but he never breaks that wall of ever being a contender. When I was watching an interview - that listed his top score ever in the Masters - he never appears to have received a score high enough to really be a contender. Thus, I wonder, do we just focus on him to just focus on him? Something to contemplate. I see he is close to the top of the leaderboard, but it will take another day for me to believe he will stay there.
Notably, programmers showed some great shots. Sam Burns seems to get a lot of coverage. I will note he is quite creative in placing sponsor coverage on his clothing, including using the collar. I have never heard of Burns, and it would have been nice to have a better introduction of him. It was, however, nice to see Rory McIlroy be more relaxed after how tense he appeared over the last few years. Based on a recent documentary (which I think is fair game here considering how big it was) it seems like he had trouble recovering ever since his first tournament hitting into the woods so many.
I will add that they are speaking about one of the IBM ads using AI to choose different players to show. I certainly hope that is only for the app and would explain the disheveled style of the broadcast if, indeed, they have been using AI for multiple years in choosing who to show.
When I read someone's review on a different site they said that the par 4 contest was optional and not recommended. Now, I am starting to wish I covered it, but it's too late to record it now. I can see why they do what they do with the dry chip in putt because I wanted to watch that after seeing them talk about it heavily on this review last year, yet, I think they could have at least listed who won each category in a quick montage. The woman's amateur was heavily cut from previous years and that's pretty sad. Hopefully they delve a little more into it tomorrow, but for now I think they could have done a bit better than just mentioning the winner. Interestingly, apparently Sam Burns and Scotty Scheffler usually stay in the same house - who knew – but I suppose even pro-golfers need to bunk together. What did surprise me was that there was no mention of Gary Woodland, considering how hot a topic he is currently. Yet, I realise they are attempting to fit everything within 15 minutes and one of the segments is dedicated towards events not related to the Masters, thus, understand the need to cut some segments.