I mean, when someone says "nice win" on a pricing game can that really be classified as "adding something to the discussion"? What about saying "good pick" in Money Game, or saying "should have bailed" in Pay the Rent? Or "that was a short lineup"? Aren't all of those in the same category? There's so many other cliches around the boards that get posted every single recap day in day out that to suddenly single one out seems a bit unfair and more of a personal attack than anything else. He's not detracting anything from anything just because he says "superior showcase", if you don't like those words there's always an ignore feature. It just seems like needlessly picking on someone who did nothing wrong.
I just don't think we should be censoring peoples posts based on a simple harmless opinion, a 2 word opinion at that! Even if it is solely by most expensive showcase (which it is not) then what is wrong with that? Just because someone might not agree with someone else's opinion does not mean it should be removed completely - especially if it is 100% harmless.
You act like this is the first time someone has had a problem with the posting style of someone. It's not. It's not suddenly singling someone else. It's having a problem with someone and saying so. If we're going to sit here and not state that we have a problem with someone then we aren't going to get anywhere. There is going to be no conversation because at that point, we might as well say that everyone is right and no one is wrong for fear of seeming to needlessly pick on someone. Yeah, people can go overboard when they disagree with someone, and that is something that needs to be monitored as well, but it's just as important as agreeing with someone.
Also, just because you don't add to the discussion doesn't mean you're detracting from it. I think there is certainly a middle ground. And what I said could apply to the other cliches you mentioned. Why was it a nice win to you? Why should they have bailed in your eyes? There doesn't need to be an explanation every time, there are 190 or so shows. To say something meaningful about every one of them would be quite a task. I completely understand that, but for me, it'd be nice to get a little insight sometimes. And I'm not saying that no one gives insight ever. People do. That's just my opinion in what I, myself, would like to see.
I agree with not removing the parts of the posts. I don't like censoring all that much depending on the instance. Also, I hate the "ignore" feature as the end all, be all solution to people's problems. I'm sorry if you can't handle what another person is posting, but sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "la la la" doesn't solve anything and potentially deprives you from a wide array of opinions, no matter how disagreeable. I'm not calling you or anyone out, I'm just stating my thoughts on it.
It just seemed like Swingbatta was unjustly judging the showcases. DJTorgo, Prizes and others disagreed with his opinion and that's just within their right as it is for Swingbatta to say "Superior Showcase". That said, I agree, that he shouldn't be stopped from saying it. If you disagree with his opinion say so, don't erase it.