First IUFB: Treadmill (Bowflex: Treadmill with 4 different workout presets); ARP: $1,799 (Matthew)
| NICOLE | JAMES | NEISHA | ANTHONY |
| 999 | 1200 | 1500 | 1501 |
Anthony is playing It's In The Bag for a chance to win up to $16,000.
Grocery items:
Second IUFB: Designer Watches (Brew Watch Co: 2 timepieces); ARP: $845 (Rachel)
| NICOLE | JAMES | NEISHA | ALICE |
| 700 | 1000 | 1 | 755 |
Alice is playing Double Prices for a new home office (desk, bookcase, cabinet, swivel chair; 23.8in touchscreen PC with 12GB RAM, 128GB SSD, 1TB HD, speakers and printer) (Matthew).
As part of Pet Adoption Week, here comes Brandon McMillan with Oogie, a silky terrier mix that's one year old adoptable at the SPCA-LA.
Third IUFB: Car Navigation System (Digital navigation system with parking assist); ARP: $1,200 (Matthew)
| NICOLE | JAMES | NEISHA | VINCENT |
| 450 | 2100 | 451 | 1 |
Neisha is playing Cover Up for a 2019 Kia Rio S (1.6L engine, 6-speed AT, FWD, etch protection) (Rachel).
| 4 | ||||
| 8 | 2 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 8 | ||
| 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| A | D | O | P | T |
| 4 | ||||
| 8 | 2 | |||
| 6 | ||||
| 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | 9 | ||
| 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
WIPEOUT
SCSD #1
| Contestant | Winnings | Spin 1 | Spin 2 | TOTAL | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alice | $845 | 15 | 35 | .50 | |
| Neisha | $1,200 | 25 | 45 | .70 | |
| Anthony | $1,799 | 60 | 10 | .70 | *OVERTIME* |
| Contestant | Winnings | Spin 1 | TOTAL | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neisha | $1,200 | 100 | 1.00 | *$1,000!* |
| Anthony | $1,799 | 100 | 1.00 | *$1,000!* |
| Contestant | Winnings | Spin 1 | TOTAL | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neisha | $2,200 | 75 | .75 | |
| Anthony | $2,799 | 100 | 1.00 | *$25,000!* |
Fourth IUFB: Basketball Arcade Game (Pop-A-Shot: Single shot electronic arcade game); ARP: $699 (Matthew)
| NICOLE | JAMES | DEBORAH | VINCENT |
| 700 | 701 | 550 | 600 |
Vincent is playing One Wrong Price for:
| $1858 | $3300 | $4049 |
| GRILL | TELEVISION | HANDBAGS |
Vincent picks the grill...
| $1858 | $3300 | $4049 |
| $1858 | $3300 | $2510 |
| LOSS |
Fifth IUFB: iPhone (Apple: 256GB iPhone 11 Pro Max with wireless charging pad); ARP: $1,309 (Overhead)
| NICOLE | JAMES | DEBORAH | MARY CHARLES |
| 1 | 1150 | 1151 | 1100 |
Deborah is playing RANGE GAME for a trip to Sydney (RT Coach to Sydney, AUS for a 6n stay in a superior room at the Holiday Inn Darling Harbour + daily breakfast, climb Sydney Harbour Bridge) (Rachel).
Deborah stops the range finder at $10,849–$10,999
ARP: $10,910. WIN
Yay, another double-wide appearance. Nicole and James have been here all show. Will one escape or are both headed for an all-expenses paid limo trip to Shrewsbury Township, New Jersey?
Sixth IUFB: Camera (Nikon: 24.3MP DSLR camera with movie mode, built-in wifi); ARP: $2,800 (Rachel)
| NICOLE | JAMES | ANDREW | MARY CHARLES |
| 1300 | 1301 | 1100 | 1200 |
Nicole departs while James escapes and is playing Switcheroo for a 2019 Ford EcoSport S Crossover (1.0L engine, 6-speed AT, FWD, first aid kit, paint/fabric protection) (Matthew)
Guess 1:
| 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | ✓ | CAR |
| 2 | 2 | ✓ | OIL DIFFUSER | |||
| 5 | 0 | ✓ | WEATHER RADIO | |||
| 4 | 0 | HAND MIXER | ||||
| 3 | 9 | MAKEUP MIRROR |
WIN
ARPs:
| 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | ✓ | $21,615 |
| 2 | 2 | ✓ | $22 | |||
| 5 | 0 | ✓ | $50 | |||
| 4 | 0 | $30 | ||||
| 3 | 9 | $49 |
SCSD #2
| Contestant | Winnings | Spin 1 | Spin 2 | TOTAL | RESULT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent | $699 | 10 | 80 | .90 | *SHOWCASE* |
| Deborah | $12,219 | 85 | 90 | 1.75 | |
| James | $24,587 | 60 | 25 | .85 |
THE FABULOUS SHOWCASES
Anthony has the honors...
SC1 - Anthony
SC2 - Vincent
Results: 2 out of 6
Winnings: $93,815
Biggest Winner: Anthony ($27,799)
This Recap is solely intended for the purpose of Golden-Road.net.
Reproduction of this without authorized consent is prohibited.
Recap produced by Roadgeek Adam
Templates by Visualbasicwizard and WhammyPower788
CSS work provided by cu2010.
A contestant should know that the first number is rarely anything other than 1 or 2.
Perhaps today's contestant tried the patented Cover Up strategy to unfortunate results.
Of course it's easier to badmouth the contestants.
It's just common sense that cars that aren't in a rarely played game like 3 strikes or given away during car week begin with a 1 or 2.
And if I were playing Cover Up, I'd intentionally screw up the first number to guarantee 3 shots at the board. However, it's not me on stage and people don't know the strategy. Don't badmouth contestants.
It's a dumb strategy to follow. And it's called criticism. If you can't handle criticism, then please don't troll about it.
It's a dumb strategy to follow. And it's called criticism. If you can't handle criticism, then please don't troll about it.
It's a dumb strategy to follow.
“We should throw out expectations of civility so some guy on a message board with five posts can feel superior to nervous game show contestants”
Also, gamesurf and bigblue999 encapsulated my exact response to that entire post.
This episode had some nastier setups (Extremely overpriced pasta sauce and overpriced utensils, the home office computer easily being deceptive for a pricier Mac, a cheaper-looking grill where you were doomed if you didn't know about the 1-2-3 guideline or that Coach aren't that expensive, the cheapest digit being right in Roo). To be completely honest, it looked like the producers only wanted Range to be won so that we didn't have a 0/6 episode and there was potential for the trip to be forfeited. Good thing we had a well-played Roo to end the episode, and producers meddling couldn't stop the double-double spinoff.
And if I were playing Cover Up, I'd intentionally screw up the first number to guarantee 3 shots at the board. However, it's not me on stage and people don't know the strategy. Don't badmouth contestants.Look, I have some sympathy for contestants, but this was *NOT* a good strategy. There was a 7 and an 8 and unless you know for sure that the options, or lack thereof, have or haven't affected the price, that's a poor way to go about the game this particular playing. The better play would've been to whiff the 2nd digit this time around and that's *if* you know Kia Rio's aren't as cheap as $14K which not everyone would. They simply set this playing up that made using the strategy very risky.
There should be posts slamming them more often for the setups, but I'd get too tired of it if I did it everyday.
Also, gamesurf and bigblue999 encapsulated my exact response to that entire post.
This episode had some nastier setups (Extremely overpriced pasta sauce and overpriced utensils, the home office computer easily being deceptive for a pricier Mac, a cheaper-looking grill where you were doomed if you didn't know about the 1-2-3 guideline or that Coach aren't that expensive, the cheapest digit being right in Roo). To be completely honest, it looked like the producers only wanted Range to be won so that we didn't have a 0/6 episode and there was potential for the trip to be forfeited. Good thing we had a well-played Roo to end the episode, and producers meddling couldn't stop the double-double spinoff.
She might as well have lost the game on purpose.
Leave that guy alone. Let's get back to the episode. No name calling and keep it civil, thanks.
Says the guy who promotes hate speech against me because I noted the contestant's lapse of judgement.
I have not promoted a single thing of hate speech against you. If you wish to tell it to my face, I will give you my address and you can deal with it there.
Otherwise, don't portray me as doing something I'm not. I just said don't badmouth contestants.
You literally told everyone to not reply to me. Don't gatekeep and quit promoting hate speech. Its hiding behind a keyboard and it is an act of cowardice.
Like I said, I can call out about how the contestant performed a dumb action.
I told them to stop replying to you. I never said anything incivil. I've been trying to keep this as civil as possible. That's not hate speech. Under the definition of hate speech - "abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation." That's not's hate speech by definition.
And you're not allowed to insult contestants. I have a right to lock this thread and I will use it if I have to.